OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Q and A: why is it an abuse of power for federal judges to throw away state laws defining marriage as a union between a one man and one woman

Posted on | June 7, 2014 | 7 Comments

Larry smith
0 approved
Submitted on 2014/06/06 at 9:28 pm

Actually, all those so-called corrupt judges struck down the various states’ gay marriage bans on the grounds the bans violated the US Constitution’s Equal Protection clause. So the judges were in fact following constitutional law.
USA: New Poll Says 50% Think Marriage Equality is a Constitutional Right
0View Post

Answer from Orly Taitz

No, federal judges are not following the US Constitution, they are following the fad of political correctness. There is nothing in US constitution saying that a man has a right to marry another man or a woman has a right to marry another woman. Marriage is a social issue, which is reserved for the states. Definition of marriage is a state issue, not a federal issue. Supreme court has already ruled that DOMA should not be applied not because it is unconstitutional, but because it is a state issue. As such federal judges violated the Constitution and the holding of the Supreme Court by butting into the state issues and redefining marriage in the way these overbearing and despotic federal judges want to redefine it. Citizens of every state have a right to define marriage. NY or Vermont could vote and define marriage as a union between a man and a woman or a man and a man, or a woman and a woman, but CA and most states in the Union defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman.  For example, a 17 year old does not have a constitutional right to get married under the US constitution. In Alabama he can get married at 17, in CA it is “not so fast, buddy”. In all the states a marriage is defined as a union between one man and one woman. If some states voted to allow one man to marry one woman or one man, so be it. However this is not a constitutional right according to the US constitution. For Federal judges to throw away the will of majority of the state population as they did in CA in throwing away the will of 40 million people who voted that marriage is a union between one man and one woman, is a flagrant abuse of power, it is federal judiciary infringing upon the rights clearly reserved for the people, it is judicial tyranny. US Constitution gave federal government very limited powers, it never gave the federal government the power to rule in the domain of the social issues.  This issue has not been settled as the Supreme Court has never decided that gay and lesbian marriage is a constitutional right. CA proposition 8 was not heard at the Supreme Court on the merits, Supreme Court refused to hear the issue because our corrupt Attorney General Kamela Harris was derelict in her duties and refused to protect the state law, she is owned by the special interests  and the Supreme Court of the US refused to allow the proponents of prop 8 to defend the law in the Supreme Court stating that only the state has standing to defend the state law in the Supreme Court. You will see different challenges rising to the Supreme Court and demanding adjudication of whether it is a state right to define marriage. I am convinced that ultimately the Supreme Court will rule this to be a state right. I also predict that the states will start revolting and seeking secession from the US due to an unprecedented abuse of the federal government and federal judiciary, just as people are rising in Great Britain, France, Catalonia, Wales, Holland and seeking secession from the EU, just as 14 former Soviet Republics seceded from the Soviet Union. You cannot abuse majority of population and spit in their faces till no end. Sooner or later people revolt.

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

7 Responses to “Q and A: why is it an abuse of power for federal judges to throw away state laws defining marriage as a union between a one man and one woman”

  1. Muff Divers Incorporated
    June 7th, 2014 @ 6:30 am

    What Dr Taitz Esq is saying is that judges need to be activist judges and never consider the constitution or laws when making decisions.

  2. Thomas
    June 7th, 2014 @ 7:27 am

    It is The Will of THE PEOPLE To Determine Their Futures/Fate… It is NOT Up To an Appointed Judge!!! OF, BY, & FOR The People,
    Marriage IS A Sacred Bond, Between 1 Man and 1 Woman For The COMMON SENSE PURPOSE Of Having Children, To Continue The HUMAN RACE!!!

  3. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    June 7th, 2014 @ 9:27 am

    no, I am saying the opposite

  4. kERRY
    June 7th, 2014 @ 9:46 am

    PLEASE ADVERTISE AND PUSH THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. IT MAY BE THE ONLY HOPE IN RESTORING OUR NATION.

    https://tinyurl.com/VetoTheFed

  5. Starlight
    June 7th, 2014 @ 9:53 am

    Muffy, please drive away and get lost.
    You are a troublesome gnat and we
    don’t need ignorant remarks from
    anyone who has evidently not
    done his/her research on what
    is happening in this country.

    It is a sad commentary on our
    educational system when some
    personage does not understand
    corruption when it is in
    our judicial system.

  6. Lefties Suck
    June 7th, 2014 @ 11:32 am

    Hey, Miss Muffy: it’s time for your meds! LOL!

  7. Denise
    June 8th, 2014 @ 6:44 am

    Nicely worded response, Dr. Taitz. if anyone claims that they cannot understand you, they are purposefully ignorant.

Leave a Reply