Is this assessment correct?

Loretta Fuddy’s response comes down to 4 options:

1. Ignore the Subpoena
a) Consequence would be Obama can’t be on the Georgia Presidential Ballot.
b) Possible “Contempt of Court” arrest warrant. However, a Georgia Subpoena may not be effective in Hawaii. Contempt charge dismissed by a federal judge.

2. Appeal to a higher Georgia judge to quash the subpoena (nullify subpoena compliance) if granted, then subpoena is null and void;

3. Appeal to a federal judge to quash the subpoena (nullify subpoena compliance.)
(Then further appeals would commence)

4. Simply comply. (I doubt it will happen.)

Will Ms. Fuddy fight this? Probably.

If Ms. Fuddy refuses, or plays games is it then time to submit a complaint to a federal grand jury? (USC Title 18 sec. 3332.)

How: https://hidden4thbranch.com/?page_id=118

What is the power in USC Title 18 sec. 3332:

https://hidden4thbranch.com/?page_id=113

Kelly Z. Mordecai, Author- “The Hidden 4th Branch”

Response from Orly:

Kelly, if Fuddy would have been in GA, you would be 100% correct.

The problem is that she is in HI. If she decides to avoid the state of GA for the rest of her life, it is hard to really go after her. That is the reason, why I am working so hard in going to HI, to get a judge in HI to sign the subpoena, to extwend the subpoena to HI, to put some teeth in it. I went 5 times already, each time just for 1 day flying red eye and getting enormous abuse from a corrupt deputy attorney general Nagamine, whose husband is a family attorney for Obama’s family.

You can help by reporting, what is transpiring to HI attorneys bar, to the House of Representatives  oversight committee (Chaairman Darrel Issa), Elections Committee (Chairman Gregg Harper)  to the office of the Inspector  general of the Department of Justice. Obstruction of justice, fraud and forgery, that is being perpetrated by the officials in the state of HI is unprecedented in human history. Keep in mind that the whole state is run by an incestuous clique: the governor is a friend of Obama’ds family, the Attorney Genral is a fellow  Occidental college  graduate and the Deputy attorney General specifically assigned to handle complaints against the Health Department is married to a private attorney for Obama’s family.

Their interpretation of this staute 338-18 is corruption bordering on insanity. The statute was created to protect confidential information. What are they protecting, if Obama already released the information and he posted this alleged birth certificate on mugs and T-shirts? The only thing they are protecting, is forgery from prosecution.

She wants the judge to award her costs of protecting this forgery. I am wondering, whether she wants the judge to award the cost of concocting this forgery as well? Should I pay for thetime it took the forger to draw this birth certificate? Should I pay for the computer program he used to produce this computer generated forgery? Just wondering. 

I hope one day there will be criminal prosecution of all the people involved, just as there was prosecution in Watergate.