OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

This precedent talks only about a proceeding of quashing a subpoena or compelling appearance. Obama has no standing to remove to Federal court IN trial. He could only fight an order to compel his appearance. I didn’t even ask for such an order, no such order was issued. If Obama does not show up and does not testify as a witness, the trial will go on

Posted on | October 14, 2012 | 4 Comments

Magpie 0 approved magpie@aol.com 216.12.194.4

Hmmmm. This here says a Federal witness CAN remove to Federal court.

https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/FD6F68CFB112A5B285257800004FE3BF/$file/07-5358-1113569.pdf

magpie@aol.com
Magpie
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

4 Responses to “This precedent talks only about a proceeding of quashing a subpoena or compelling appearance. Obama has no standing to remove to Federal court IN trial. He could only fight an order to compel his appearance. I didn’t even ask for such an order, no such order was issued. If Obama does not show up and does not testify as a witness, the trial will go on”

  1. Harry
    October 14th, 2012 @ 11:29 am

    Orly- you are fighting the GOOD fight for TRUTH- these devious political schemes that are concocted in the backrooms of the DEMOCRATIC party will eventually be uncovered because we true Americans will never rest until this evil is exposed- most DEMOCRATs know that Obama is a FRAUD but dont care because party loyalty trumps all-

  2. Magpie
    October 14th, 2012 @ 12:33 pm

    Hope you have that RICO statement done so it can be filed with the court tomorrow.

    It should be an entertaining read since what you have posted so far on your website here is nothing even close to what is required.

  3. Factual Truth
    October 14th, 2012 @ 2:55 pm

    That sound GREAT!

    That the trial can go on even without Barrack Hussein Obama making a court appearance, because we all know that Barrack Hussein Obama AIN’T going to show up in any courtroom and come face to face with Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.

  4. Factual Truth
    October 14th, 2012 @ 2:57 pm

    That SOUNDS GREAT!!!

    That the trial can go on even without Barrack Hussein Obama making a court appearance.

    We all know that Barrack Hussein Obama AIN’T going to show up in any courtroom and come face to face with Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., NO HOW, NO WAY.

Leave a Reply