OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

A note to Obama zombies: a witness cannot remove a case to Federal court. Obama was subpoenaed as a witness, he is not a defendant. He was subpoenaed just to give him notice and an opportunity to testify as a witness. The trial will proceed with or without him. additionally, at isue is not his work as a federal employee, but his candidacy, as a private person running for office

Posted on | October 14, 2012 | 7 Comments

Julia Chiles 0 approved

Word is many forums is that one of the attorneys that received that subpoena from you for President Obama to appear in court is going to have the case removed to Federal court first thing Monday the 22nd since President Obama is considered a Federal employee.

What are you going to do when the case is removed to Federal Court?
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

7 Responses to “A note to Obama zombies: a witness cannot remove a case to Federal court. Obama was subpoenaed as a witness, he is not a defendant. He was subpoenaed just to give him notice and an opportunity to testify as a witness. The trial will proceed with or without him. additionally, at isue is not his work as a federal employee, but his candidacy, as a private person running for office”

  1. Constitutional Crisis
    October 14th, 2012 @ 10:12 am

    Is the subpoena valid?

  2. Don't Touch My Junk
    October 14th, 2012 @ 11:54 am

    Is Obama a federal employee? Or a federal employer? Regardless, an emergency motion in federal court to restrain Obama from filing for removal sounds the way to go. That way, there has to be an emergency hearing before the Indiana trial can be derailed.

  3. Verity
    October 14th, 2012 @ 12:44 pm

    Yes. Enforceable? No.

  4. Karl
    October 14th, 2012 @ 2:23 pm

    “Is the subpoena valid?”

    Why would it not be? And, even if it were not valid, how could that stop the trial?

    Your identification of yourself as “Constitutional crisis” brings to mind the fact that Barack Obama or whoever he is created this constitutional crisis himself by running for a public office for which criminal investigation indicates that he is not eligible, and chooses to perpetuate that crisis by persistently and defiantly refusing to prove his claimed eligibility as required by our state election laws.

  5. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 14th, 2012 @ 3:34 pm

    that is a true obot advice. Trust me, I would not touch your legal advice junk or any other junk with a 6 foot poll

  6. Dr. Conspiracy
    October 15th, 2012 @ 7:22 am

    You’re certainly correct that non-Party Barack Obama cannot remove the Indiana case to a federal court.

    However, there’s no way you can adjudicate the validity of his birth certificate or other documents WITHOUT naming him as a party.

    I’m frankly wondering exactly what this trial on the 22nd is about, since the judge limited it SOLELY to the actions against the Secretary of State and the Elections Commission.

  7. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 15th, 2012 @ 2:29 pm

    we asked to bifurcate and have an expedited trial only on two issues against 2 defendants. Also, look at Fulani v Hogsett. The court did not find that the candidates, who were sought to be removed be part of the case.
    I am going by the book

Leave a Reply