While I generally support Trump, I personally would handle differently the interview with Hugh Hewitt
Posted on | September 4, 2015 | 9 Comments
While I generally support Trump, I personally would handle differently the interview with Hugh Hewitt
By Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Yesterday a conservative commentator, Hugh Hewitt, asked Trump several tough questions in regards to foreign policy and the Middle East. Trump did not know the answers and lashed out at Hewitt calling him a third rate commentator. I generally support Trump and feel that he is the best candidate to turn this country around, however I believe he needs to change his policy and modus operandi in not lashing out at reporters. He could state: Hugh, I am still studying this issue and will get back with you within a few days. Nobody would have faulted Trump for that. This way he would not burn bridges with a very influential commentator and would look more presidential.
Now to the questions.
The first question was about General Sulemani, commander of al Kutz forces of Iranian National Guard. Hewitt asked if his behavior will change with the Iran deal.
My answer is: it will change, he will get more bald and his recent visit to Russia is a testiment to that.
Further, Hewitt asked about several radical Muslim leaders: Nasralla, Zawahiri, Al Bagdadi, Al Julani.
My answers:
1. Nasralla. He is a leader of the Islamic Jihad in Lebanon
2. Zawahiri. He is a leader of Al Qaeda
3. Al Baghdadi. He is the leader of ISIS
4. Al Julani. He is the leader of Al Nusra.
So, these would be my answers. Trump is not expected to know all of these leaders, we still have 16 months before the 2016 election, but at this point he needs to act presidential, stop lashing out on every reporter, who asks him a question, and needs to start giving diplomatic answers, such as : let me get back with you on this matter.
-
Trump rips into Hugh Hewitt after foreign policy gaffePolitico – 4 hours ago
Donald Trump tore into radio host Hugh Hewitt as a “third-rate radio announcer” on Friday …
- Hugh Hewitt Stumps Donald Trump With Question On Iran’s Quds Force (AUDIO)
Talking Points Memo – 3 hours ago
Comments
9 Responses to “While I generally support Trump, I personally would handle differently the interview with Hugh Hewitt”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

September 4th, 2015 @ 10:05 am
Hugh Hewitt’s an amnesty guy and, as expected, attempted to ambush President Wall Builder. Trump called him on it like no other candidate would have dared. This is why we love Trump. He’s too smart for them and won’t play their game.
As for Hewitt and his pro-illegal alien fellow-travelers, this article gives the fuller picture https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/09/03/transparently-predictable-political-maneuverings-within-msm-and-salem-communications/
September 4th, 2015 @ 10:23 am
I support Trump and I am not a fan of Hewitt, however it is time for Trump to start acting presidential
September 4th, 2015 @ 11:19 am
So does anyone like his comment about Kim Davis?
lst: The Supreme Court isn’t suppose to make laws, they are only suppose to interpret the Constitution. So issuing licenses to gays it isn’t the law of the land. Only the Constitution is.
2nd: The Constitution grants us religious liberty. Any law that violates this in any form is unconstitutional and still isn’t the law of the land.
Kim Davis’ case is just as wrong as telling a couple to either get out the marriage business or pay a fine and go to jail for not marrying gays.
There can be both, where both sides’ religious beliefs are protected. If one person refuses to license or marry the gays, then the gays can go to someone else and get one of their friends to do it. This type of law would give everyone their freedom without violating anyone’s beliefs.
Conclusion: Trump isn’t a strong supporter for religious liberty.
September 4th, 2015 @ 12:47 pm
They tried to take Trump out similar to bimbo kelly! Trump fired back…this is WAR!
September 4th, 2015 @ 12:50 pm
Given the Iran deal perhaps Obama can be #5.
Louie Gohmert (R-TX) on for Hannity today explaining that the Iran “deal” is really a “treaty” and changes elements of earlier treaties.
The Corker Deal, he says, is NOT applicable.
He will enter a bill Monday stating that now that the Iran agreement has been read , it is CLEAR it is a treaty and must follow the 2/3 rule to be valid.
He also states that Boehner greets him (Gohmert) with “Good Morning, SH*THEAD” when he sees him in the halls of Congress.
(He politely paraphrased it to “Poop-head” for the radio audience.
That type of behavior and the Republicans’ wanton disregard for the Constitution are beginning to rival Obama’s.
Trump is a diamond being polished, and the American people, knowing the real deal, will abandon the wannabe “Moissanites” in the Republican Party with their fake sparkle and little value.
September 4th, 2015 @ 12:58 pm
#1 Dustin has posted a MUST READ article!!!!!
September 4th, 2015 @ 2:01 pm
Orly’s right!
And it’s possible that a non-politician would not fully and clearly understand some of the lingo the seasoned politician would, L.J.
September 4th, 2015 @ 3:58 pm
club for growth to spend millions to take down trump and peeps want trump to be Mr. nice guy…
https://www.wnd.com/2015/09/club-for-growth-declares-war-on-trump/
September 4th, 2015 @ 4:42 pm
Thanks Judy for the tip to read that article in Number 1.
Gracias 😉