OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

What a Divided Supreme Court Would Mean for the Future of Immigration

Posted on | April 18, 2016 | 1 Comment

What a Divided Supreme Court Would Mean for the Future of Immigration

NBCNews.com  – ‎1 hour ago‎
WASHINGTON – With the Supreme Court appearing deeply divided over the fate of President Obama’s deportation plan, the future of U.S.
US top court appears unlikely to revive Obama immigration plan
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

One Response to “What a Divided Supreme Court Would Mean for the Future of Immigration”

  1. John
    April 18th, 2016 @ 6:13 pm

    House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte on House Resolution 639.

    https://judiciary.house.gov/press-release/goodlatte-congress-writes-laws-president-enforces/

    Today, the Supreme Court will allow the House of Representatives 15 minutes of oral argument as the Court examines whether President Obama’s executive actions on immigration should be held unconstitutional.

Leave a Reply