Washington Times writes about eligibility for presidency of Ted Cruz, but does not write about Obama’s usurpation of the US presidency with a stolen SSN and fabricated IDs. Washington Times is a part of our controlled media
Posted on | March 4, 2015 | 4 Comments
CRUZ-CANADA HUBBUB BEGINS ANEW
“Is Ted Cruz constitutionally barred from the presidency?” asks Doyle McManus, a syndicated Los Angeles Times columnist, who points out that the senator was born in Canada to an American mother and a Cuban father.
“Thanks to his mother, Cruz was a U.S. citizen at birth. But that doesn’t clear up a legal muddle that’s as old as the Constitution: Is a U.S. citizen born abroad qualified to serve as president? Cruz hasn’t simply renounced Canadian moderation; last year, he formally renounced the Canadian half of his dual citizenship,” Mr. McManus writes.
He continues, “But even that doesn’t settle the constitutional issue — at least not to the satisfaction of some of the ‘birthers’ who asserted that President Obama was born outside the United States. ‘Clearly there is an issue of eligibility,’ chief birther Orly Taitz told U.S. News a while ago. ‘It’s basically the same issue as Obama.’ Except that in Cruz’s case, he really was born in a foreign country.”
Mr. McManus adds, “It won’t be easy to get a once-and-for-all decision. Somebody has to get the question into the courts through a lawsuit. But as the birthers discovered in 2008, most judges don’t think voters have legal standing to sue over a candidate’s qualifications. One of Cruz’s competitors in the race could sue, but that might not play well as a campaign issue. That leaves the matter in Cruz’s hands. As an ‘originalist’ who believes in the literal meaning of the Constitution, he ought to be the first to want that murky phrase in Article II cleared up.”
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Comments
4 Responses to “Washington Times writes about eligibility for presidency of Ted Cruz, but does not write about Obama’s usurpation of the US presidency with a stolen SSN and fabricated IDs. Washington Times is a part of our controlled media”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

March 4th, 2015 @ 4:48 pm
obama in contempt
https://therightscoop.com/texas-gov-abbott-says-obama-misled-fed-judge-pushes-for-contempt/
March 4th, 2015 @ 5:55 pm
Cruz had a Cuban father at birth. Soetoro had a British/colonial father at birth.The SCOTUS settled this in a case in 1875 which set a precedent for the meaning of natural born citizen as one born on US soil to two U.S. citizen parents as required by the constitution for presidential eligibility. Rubio and Jindal also not eligible for parental reasons. Old Marine Phil Stone
March 4th, 2015 @ 6:28 pm
Obama tells judge he wants decision by monday
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-05/obama-sets-monday-deadline-for-appealing-immigration-order?cmpid=yhoo
March 4th, 2015 @ 8:11 pm
John McCain was born in a foreign country; he was born off-base in a civilian facility.
He qualifies as a cititzen at birth via:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401
and more specifically via:
https://corpuslegalis.com/us/code/title8/persons-born-in-the-canal-zone-or-republic-of-panama-on-or-after-february-26-1904
Note that neither of these man-made laws state that he is a natural born citizen.
If a person needs a statute to declare themself a citizen, they are not a natural born citizen.