Very important. I got a testimony stating that the Dem party further altered the BC that they submitted to Judge Wingate, I need confirmation
Posted on | October 10, 2012 | 9 Comments
I got a letter from an individual, who analysed the BC as it was first posted by Obama on WH.gov and the one that the Dem Party of MS submitted to judge Wingate. (I redacted this experts’s name for now) According to him there was further falsification of the record. It was not just a better copy, somebody made it look more as a genuine doc, less as a piece of garbage that it is,it was actually redacted
I did notice myslf, that indeed, when Obama first posted his BC on line, it had a huge halo effect and kerning. With time halo effect became less and less visible an kerning is less visible as well.
I believe the forgers saw that they released a piece of garbage, so they continued working on it. I need people, who usually work with docs and Adobe Illustrator and other programs, to analyse what was produce by Obama on April 27, 2012 and what was submitted to court to Judge Wingate and provide an opinion in a form of a sworn affidavit.
MS BCs as they were submitted by the Dem Party in MS,
I am …………….name redactedPhD
BS Mechanical Engineering, MS & PhD in Engineering Mechanics
I have over 50 years experience with a variety of computers including: Personal Computers, Work Stations, Mainframes and Super Computers
I have examined the two image copies of the purported Obama LFCOLB which exist as electronic documents
92436040-212-05-04-MDEC-Motion-for-JOP-with-Exhibits.pdf (page 8)
96200621-2012-06-06-MDEC-Motion-to-Supplement-Response-to-Motion-for-Sanctions-S-D-Miss.pdf (page 11)
which were filed in your court by the Mississippi Democrat Executive Committee (MDEC) as well as the original PDF image of President Obama’s Long-Form-Birth-Certificate posted on the White House web site
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
and have found significant alterations were made to the original PDF image. The alterations to the (page 8) document are incidental. However the alterations to the (page 11) image are extensive as follows.
1. The (page 8) image is identical to the white House image except for the “Case Label” and the “The Friends of TheFogBow.com” Logo.
2. The (page 8) document was altered to make the (page 11) document.
3. These alterations to (page 8) to make (page 11) have been detected:
a. The (page 8) image was flattened, rasterized and green color was added
b. The color of all text was changed from near-black to black-green
c. Numerous form lines were repaired
d. Specific words were made selectable by mouse and cursor
e. The basket-weave background was touched up
e. Hidden editing was applied:
(I) Ten Line Objects were added
(ii) Two Green Color objects were added
(iii) Strikeout was applied to the words “Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological” and “August”
(iiv) Seven Black Redaction Box Objects were added.
4. Remaining words left unstruck or redacted (on hidden image):
(I) “State of Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth Department of Health”
(II) “61 10641″ (file number 151 is redacted)
(III) “Barack Hussein Obama, II”
(IV) “Honolulu”
(V) “6085 Kalaianaole Highway”
5. Words which can be selected on (page 11) by mouse and cursor in Adobe Reader
(aa) “State of Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth Department of Health”
(bb) “61 10641″ (File number 151 is non-selectable)
(dd) “Barack Hussein Obama, II”
(ee) “Honolulu”
(ff) “Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital
(gg) “6085 Kalanianaole”
(hh) “Hussein Obama”
(gg) “University”
6. Only the “Case label” is selectable by mouse and cursor on (page 8)
I attest to this under penalty of perjury.
Comments
9 Responses to “Very important. I got a testimony stating that the Dem party further altered the BC that they submitted to Judge Wingate, I need confirmation”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

October 10th, 2012 @ 2:07 pm
This is a very important point, Orly. Obama’s lawyers are talking only about the information on the forms, but they conveniently leave out the fact that nowhere does the verification letter vouch for the authenticity of the document itself.
October 10th, 2012 @ 2:34 pm
we need to empty gitmo as soon as possible… it will be needed for all the crooks and cheats of the obama admin and the judges who are trying to decieve the pubblic… every judge who screwed us needs to be sent there.. every sec of state.. every election commissioners… a few thousand to say the least..
and to make it cheap feed them one meal a day of hot dogs cause it would resemble what they are… a bunch of garbage put together to take away our country
SERIOUSLY if our justice system wont do whats right and follow the written law, what other recourse do we have?
be carefull because ideas could get you thrown in jail
will
October 10th, 2012 @ 2:42 pm
I think that Corsi is familiar with the different versions of the birth certificate-
October 10th, 2012 @ 3:48 pm
Aren’t there any honest Democrats that have the MORAL FIBER to step-in and stop all this corrupt and dishonest behavior coming from the WHITE HOUSE.
Is the Democratic PARTY LOYALTY so strong that it destroys their MORALS.
Why AREN’T any Democratic SPEAKING-OUT out about Barrack Hussein Obama’s FRAUDULENT Birth Certificate.
Why are the Democrats just shying away from the fact the Social security’s own “E-Verify” on more than ONE OCCASION have comfirmed the fact that they never, ever issued Barrack Hussein Obama the Social security Number he is CURRENTLY USING?
I’ve never, ever seen so many people let their Moral Character go down the cesspool like is happening right now in America. Why? There really AIN’T no good answer for that happening. So for what ever reason that, that is happening is for a BAD REASON.
October 10th, 2012 @ 5:50 pm
checkmate!
October 10th, 2012 @ 6:28 pm
Nice story about the BC document alterations, and IF the analysis is in FACT TRUE… then whoopee… however one has to be extremely cautious about DEVIOUS attempts at misleading people to another path off of their original pursuits.
October 11th, 2012 @ 4:47 am
What is a “testimony”?
October 11th, 2012 @ 5:16 am
Has this “expert” ever been recognized as such by a US court?
October 11th, 2012 @ 5:19 am
a guy by name “Flynnstone” wants his questions to be taken seriously?