Update from an investigator. I need help in ascertaining: who concocted the story about 6 feet waves even though the video showed no waves at all??? Can someone trace the timing of the story of 6 feet waves and Fuddy’s body left in fuselage, where did it come from?
Posted on | January 16, 2014 | 6 Comments
Good morning Orly,
Here is another observation. In my interviews with Richard Schuman, he indicated waves of 6 feet and rough conditions. In my conversation with Jim Struhsaker of the NTSB he indicated waves of 6 feet and high currents. The conversation with Lewis Fuddy was the same, waves of 6 feet and rough seas. It seems strange that all would have the same false story. Who is spreading the lie.
If there was a prefabricated story then the report of Fuddy being left in the plane would make sense. We know from the video the pilot knew Fuddy was out of the plane. Where did that false information start? From my notes: *Schuman blamed the pilot for speaking from the hip and reporting one passenger in the fuselage. Schuman claimed everyone survived the crash landing and made it safely to the water as reported by his pilot friend and the coast guard.
Here is a possible explanation. There was a plan to poison Fuddy and then ditch the plane. The plan called for her to die in the plane and then ditch it. Somehow the timing was off and the plane ditched early. Those close to the plan gave out the wrong information. 6 foot waves and fuddy was left in the fuselage.
Just trying to connect the dots.

Comments
6 Responses to “Update from an investigator. I need help in ascertaining: who concocted the story about 6 feet waves even though the video showed no waves at all??? Can someone trace the timing of the story of 6 feet waves and Fuddy’s body left in fuselage, where did it come from?”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

January 16th, 2014 @ 12:57 pm
If the premise of the person who spoke in the above category is true, then, the one person that does know what’s going on was the person who is part of the NTSB…and maybe even the owner of the plane?
And I noticed that the plane they show in te water is not HUNDREDS of yards off shore. It’s very close to shore. So someone got the logistics incorrect, as well.
January 16th, 2014 @ 1:44 pm
This thing is becoming deja vu (all over again.) The similarity to this and the murder of Ron Brown has to be more than coincidental.
As Brown had too much baggage and had to be eliminated, so too Fuddy. So what if many innocent people had to die also? This country is run by pschopaths.
January 16th, 2014 @ 5:24 pm
Dear Orly,
Here is a report attributing the “6-ft waves” to:
Excerpt:
“Hollstein, 70, said he swam about a half-mile in 6-foot waves to Molokai’s rugged shoreline, thinking the others aboard the plane were fine bobbing in their life vests, awaiting rescue.”
https://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/01/14/top-hawaii-health-official-died-irregular-heartbeat-triggered-by-plane-crash/
Hawaii health official died of irregular heartbeat triggered by plane crash, autopsy finds
Published January 14, 2014 / Associated Press
In later reports Schuman is cited as saying “catastrophic engine failure”, but in this report he is quoted saying:
Excerpt:
“Makani Kai Air owner Richard Schuman said he has no idea why the engine failed. The plane had no previous problems, he said.”
————–
Another “6-ft waves” source:
https://bigstory.ap.org/article/last-moments-recounted-official-killed-crash
Hawaii survivor: Plane lost power, then glided
By JENNIFER SINCO KELLEHER
— Dec. 13, 2013 9:18 PM EST
Excerpt:
“C. Phillip Hollstein Jr., a 70-year-old Kailua man, swam a half-mile in 6-foot waves to a rugged shoreline after the crash, which killed state health Director Loretta Fuddy.”
—————-
Paula Hoehn
January 16th, 2014 @ 5:42 pm
Orly,
Seems the the Airline owner and recipient of $2 mil of Obama bucks would be the guy to establish the narative…6 foot waves, etc., bein’ he has the most to lose.
January 16th, 2014 @ 10:00 pm
It’s something along the lines of what your thinking. I think the guy that swam to shore was left out of the concocted story and let the cat out of the bag as to the truth. After they had to resort to plan B while in the water the story became convoluted and it caused the differing stories of reality and propaganda.
January 17th, 2014 @ 10:53 am
Just a thought:
Is it possible that Schuman cited the “catastrophic engine failure” AFTER he originally stated that he did not know why the engine failed and it had no previous problems?
As the investigation proceeded, he felt that his first statement was incorrect????
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In later reports Schuman is cited as saying “catastrophic engine failure”, but in this report he is quoted saying:
Excerpt:
“Makani Kai Air owner Richard Schuman said he has no idea why the engine failed. The plane had no previous problems, he said.”