Transcript in Lindsey case, where the Chief Justice and other judges make minced meat out of the political question doctrine in relation to the presidential candidate
Posted on | February 17, 2014 | 5 Comments
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
5 Responses to “Transcript in Lindsey case, where the Chief Justice and other judges make minced meat out of the political question doctrine in relation to the presidential candidate”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

February 17th, 2014 @ 3:22 pm
they argue opposite to what they argued in my case. In my case they argued that SOS has no right to remove a candidate, only the Congress can do it
February 17th, 2014 @ 3:50 pm
We do not have a drug free government. This is the result. Orly does the law require a drug test to hold a security clearance? How about federal judges?
February 17th, 2014 @ 4:15 pm
no, not to my knowledge
February 19th, 2014 @ 12:19 pm
Correct me if my interpretation is wrong.
Basically a candidate can be put on a ballot at the state level regardless if they meet the constitutional requirements or not. Because its not the states job to make sure they qualify nor their job to investigate qualifications but State says it congress’s job. So once a candidate passes the ballot test,gains office and has NOT been properly vetted by congress it takes an act of Congress to get the usurper out BUT then the issue fails because to save face on the party in control of the Senate where impeachment process has to start they will simply put it back on the State. So therefore NOTHING will be done & NOTHING will change. Does that sum it up?