there has to be a security check
Posted on | January 1, 2011 | 3 Comments
| bacsi |
Submitted on 2011/01/01 at 10:14am
This is a start but it needs to be taken to another level which requires that all candidates for positions that involve access to classified information must pass a security background check for the highest classification level involved. Either get serious about our political representatives, judges, etc. being honorable individuals or quit wasting your time complaining about corruption; politicians and whoever are only corrupt because We the People allow it. |
Here we go! Act one: 14 states will unveil a bill, which will inerpret 14th amendment, as relating to children of citizens only. No more U.S. citizenship for children of illegal immigrants. Children will follow the status of their parents. Child of a tourist, is a tourist, child of an illegal is an illegal, even if born on U.S. soil. States have to protect themselves or go bankrupt. States are fighting back against the globalist cartel, which is robbing this nation blind |
Probably for the first time I agree with Bacsi. There has to be a a mandatory security check.
So, let’s make it an action item 2
Lobby each state and US Representative and Senator to pass legislation, whereby every candidate for office will have to go through the security check. That will include State and Federal judges. There has to be a security check for all attorneys hired as law clerks for judges. Great idea Bacsi. Are you willing to spear head this project? if you do, call me 949-683-5411
Comments
3 Responses to “there has to be a security check”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

January 1st, 2011 @ 12:33 pm
Such a requirement, of course, would violate the constitution, which already sets out all the terms to qualify a president. Funny how you’re no longer interested in the constitution on this point.
January 2nd, 2011 @ 10:32 am
I guess Joe forgot about the 22nd amendment to the Constitution, that referenced in his remark.
January 2nd, 2011 @ 2:22 pm
I’m not clear what hippybiker’s point is: I said the Constitution is the only source of presidential eligibility rules. The 22nd Amendment is part of the Constitution. Duh.