OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

The Law of Nations is quoted in the Constitution

Posted on | August 8, 2009 | 3 Comments

This was posted on Citizen Wells and and Natural Born Citizen.

You Article II s.1′er guys are just going to love this………THE CONSTITUTION DOES INDEED DEFINE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN AS BORN OF 2 US CITIZEN PARENTS AND ‘IN COUNTRY’, further it defines allegiance by patrilineage!!!
Greg Goss wrote:
The Constitution and de Vattel’s Law of Nations has the answer to any questions regarding citizenship abroad and any laws crossing national boundaries:
EXCERPT 1. U.S. Constitution, Article II, §1:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, OR a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;
EXCERPT 2: de Vattel’s Law of Nations circa 1758 Book 1, Chapter XIX, § 212:
The natives, or NATURAL-BORN CITIZENS, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens…The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.
Finally, the main item in the Constitution that ties both together:
EXCERPT 3: U.S. Constitution, Article I, §8:
The Congress shall have Power…To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations
Yes, Law of Nations is CAPITALIZED, meaning our framers were citing a proper name. There was only one Law of Nations in 1787 officially declared. And yes, Congress has the power to create and enforce ANY LAW mentioned in the Law of Nations written by Emmerich de Vattel! It was sitting right under our noses the entire time.
https://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel_01.htm
————
US Citizen is defined by the 14th amendment.
Natural Born Citizen is defined by The Law Of Nations, which is cited in the Constitution as its very basis
Not only does the Law of Nations state that a natural born citizen is born in country of two citizen parents, it ALSO says that the patrilineage determines allegiance, meaning Barack’s father who was British/Kenyan determined Obama’s citizenship.

“In God We Trust” (and ONLY God!)

Go to Previous
message |

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

3 Responses to “The Law of Nations is quoted in the Constitution”

  1. NavyMom
    August 8th, 2009 @ 1:17 pm

    Then it would appear that you do not need proof of Obama’s birth certificate, right? You can go to court with the evidence you already possess, can’t you? 🙂

    Stay safe and focussed Orly, and get some rest too if possible. I’ve been worried. It’s a really dangerous world. 🙁

    Can someone tell me what I need to do to become a member? All of my posts just sit there for days waiting moderation. What am I doing wrong? I even made a donation through snail mail because I don’t give my credit card info online. Ok, I’m knocking on the door, will someone let me in please? 🙂

  2. JOHN
    August 8th, 2009 @ 2:27 pm

    ONE OF ABOUT 100 I RECEIVED FROM THE BLOW HARD (ALL THE SAME)…..

    Subj: From Senator Christopher J. Dodd
    Date: 8/7/2009 1:32:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time
    From: Correspondence_reply@dodd.senate.gov
    To:
    Sent from the Internet (Details)

    August 7, 2009

    Dr.
    Street
    Connecticut

    Dear Dr.:

    Thank you for contacting me regarding President Barack Obama’s status as a U.S. citizen and his constitutional eligibility to serve as President of the United States.

    As you may know, Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution outlines several qualifications that an individual must possess in order to be considered eligible for the office of President. Specifically, the President must be a natural born U.S. citizen, have resided in the United States for at least 14 years, and be at least 35 years old. In addition, the 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which was ratified in 1868, states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.”

    According to official records, President Obama was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Hawaii. Given that Hawaii attained statehood in August 1959, President Obama does meet the constitutional requirement of being a natural born citizen of the United States. He is therefore eligible, under the United States Constitution, to serve as President of the United States.

    Thank you again for contacting me. If you would like to stay in touch with me on this and other issues of importance, please visit my web site at https://dodd.senate.gov and subscribe to receive my regular e-mail issue alerts. Please do not hesitate to contact me again if I may be of assistance to you in any way.

    Sincerely,
    CHRISTOPHER J. DODD
    United States Senator

  3. Jim Buzzell
    August 8th, 2009 @ 3:01 pm

    Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874; check it out this is in the SCOTUS decision of 1874; about 9 paragraphs into the decision Chief Justice Waite weighs in on NBC.