Supreme Court published granted orders from yesterday’s conference, Keyes v Bowen is not among granted orders, which means that it was denied and denial will be posted later on today or tomorrow
Posted on | September 27, 2011 | 9 Comments
| 09/27/11 | Miscellaneous Order |
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
9 Responses to “Supreme Court published granted orders from yesterday’s conference, Keyes v Bowen is not among granted orders, which means that it was denied and denial will be posted later on today or tomorrow”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

September 27th, 2011 @ 6:13 am
ok, I’m really gett’n pissed off, Mr. Moran do you have room in your car???
September 27th, 2011 @ 6:24 am
What do you expect? That was Gary Kreep’s failure.
We have Lady Liberty to rely on.
September 27th, 2011 @ 6:41 am
And the winning streak continues.
September 27th, 2011 @ 7:39 am
A quick question for anyone that knows the answer:
A question that I never see being asked, based on questions of Mr. obama’s background is; what is his legal name and is that the name he is signing the bills with? What happens if, after he is gone (replaced or fired) it is discovered that he signed the bills into law using a fake name??
September 27th, 2011 @ 9:43 am
I have alway felt that a civil suit against Polosie for fraud re certification of Obama might be a easier road to travel. Has this been considered? Comments
September 27th, 2011 @ 10:39 am
Don – This is a great question.
The Usurper’s real name is Bary Soetoro. His adopted father named him that and enrolled him in school in Indonesia under that name. It’s never been changed.
And the usurper does NOT have a birth certificate. (Nor a social security nor selective service numbers.) So, it’s Barry Soetoro.
And, because he has been using a false name, everything he’d done id null and void.
September 27th, 2011 @ 11:40 am
So why is WND reporting that the case is before the Supremes Keyes v Bowen and Kreep’s the one whose case it is??
September 27th, 2011 @ 12:13 pm
it was submitted for the conference on September 26, asking for an ok to submit an actual appeal, but it is not on the list of the cases which got an ok from the Supreme court to submit an appealthe list in the link), which means that it will be on the list of denied requests which will be published later on today or tomorrow (99% of requests for a hearing with the Supreme court never get an ok to be even heard)
September 27th, 2011 @ 7:53 pm
Thanks for the clarification, Orly. Do you think the Kreep knows he’s lost?