Reuters: U.S. public opposes Syrian intervention as Obama presses Congress
Posted on | September 3, 2013 | 8 Comments
U.S. public opposes Syria intervention as Obama presses Congress
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama has failed so far to convince most Americans that the United States should launch a limited military strike against Syria in response to a suspected chemical weapons attack by the Syrian government, a Reuters/Ipsos poll showed on Tuesday. Some 56…
Comments
8 Responses to “Reuters: U.S. public opposes Syrian intervention as Obama presses Congress”
Leave a Reply













29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

September 3rd, 2013 @ 3:27 pm
Can Hussein arm rebels less evil? Such evil lurks in nation’s capitol. Orly learns now something that is lucid. Looks like Orly’s vision equals some others. Rally liberty yesterday!
September 3rd, 2013 @ 5:05 pm
It’s NOT just the 93% public it’s the servicemen also
https://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/ididntjoin-stunning-photos-of-u-s-service-members-publicly-saying-no-to-war-with-syria
September 3rd, 2013 @ 6:33 pm
The Royal Court at Versailles (the District of Corruption) is wearing out its welcome with the American people.
September 3rd, 2013 @ 7:31 pm
Interesting to hear Juan Williams on O’Reilly state,” the military does not like the commander-in-chief.”
Hmmm Hmmm Hmmm
September 3rd, 2013 @ 7:32 pm
Interesting to hear Juan Williams on O’Reilly state,” the military does not like the commander-in-chief.”
Hmmm Hmmm Hmmm
September 3rd, 2013 @ 10:54 pm
They keep saying they have the votes in the senate…but they don’t have them in the House!
And all left-wing liberal (D)’s need do to figure out whether Obama is good or bad, is to keep track of what he DOES!
If he goes against the Constitution and the will of the people, then, he deserves to be arrested, on the spot!
September 3rd, 2013 @ 11:29 pm
How is jumping into a war between one group that hates the USA, and another group that hates the USA, in a Country that has historically hated the USA, a good idea, or in America’s best interests?
No Boots on the ground, limited engagement, two weeks or more advance notice that we are coming (maybe).
How is that a threat or deterrent? Or responsible leadership?
September 3rd, 2013 @ 11:35 pm
“The Constitution”,
Obama “deserves to be arrested, on the spot!” for what he HAS done, not just what he is planning to do NOW.