18 Responses to “Return receipt cards showing a signature of the employee of the Dep of Justice who signed for the certified mail package with Taitz v Donahoe complaint. It is hard for me to read the name. Can someone figure the name and check with the Dep of Justice, who this mail clerk is?”

1. Elizabeth
   October 11th, 2013 @ 11:46 am

   Zooming in on the signatures,

   both of the ones on the right look
   foreign, to me.

   Arabs?? Muslims? Could be.
   That would explain the
   vanishing documents.

   If someone in the Justice Dept.
   is in on this, they will cover for
   the rascals.

2. AnotherKay
   October 11th, 2013 @ 12:08 pm

   Lakesha Murphy

3. steve
   October 11th, 2013 @ 12:14 pm

   I have’nt seen any coverage of the Trucker Rally on Fox News today. Who’s side is Fox on? It makes you wonder.

4. Linda Starr
   October 11th, 2013 @ 12:57 pm

   One of these people has to be the one you’re looking for (for the second signature anyway):

   https://www.whitepages.com/name/Lakeisha-Murphy/Maryland

5. Amir Harouni
   October 11th, 2013 @ 1:23 pm

   The first one is a stamped signature. I read it as “Edy Ar**” .

   The second one is “Lakesha Murphy”

   The third one is undecipherable!

6. Scott
   October 11th, 2013 @ 1:46 pm

   It’s proof that the Dept. Of Justice received the information. The responsibility to handle it properly rests with them. Are we to believe, that of all the certified mail they receive, they just happen to lose the one from Orly ?

   The odds of that are like having the immigration flight records missing for only the week of Obama’s birth.

   Does anyone believe that Orly could sign for receipt of a legal response, then turn around and get an extension because she misplaced it ?

7. JAK
   October 11th, 2013 @ 3:30 pm

   I’m sure that Obama has a/his Muslim filter active in the numerous ones that have been recently out. From experience Muslims are not the most sincere people in up front dealings. Obama comes from that culture.

8. Stephen Huffman
   October 11th, 2013 @ 4:56 pm

   Yes, it is received by Lakesha Murphy.

9. Stephen Huffman
   October 11th, 2013 @ 5:04 pm

   And for those wondering, I have seen the name Lakesha numerous times in the South, of people of good character, and not Muslim in any of those circumstances, so I would not make assumptions.

10. Rosemary
    October 11th, 2013 @ 5:30 pm

    Looks like Lakesha Murphy as the receiver. the agent or mailperson delivering is not discernable.

11. Birdy
    October 11th, 2013 @ 5:53 pm

    How does the post office allow them to not write their printed name and date? That seems kind of sloppy. Lakesha Murphy is the easy one. The first one looks kind of like Ely Sere.

12. will
    October 11th, 2013 @ 6:03 pm

    ihv.. no need to check for them at their present job.. most likely they got a promottion..
    will

13. Ellen
    October 11th, 2013 @ 6:43 pm

    The third name maybe Alec?

14. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 11th, 2013 @ 7:03 pm

    Important is the one that signed at the US attorneys office, looks like the nae of the guy who usually signs for them: Eddy Hase

15. Ed.O
    October 11th, 2013 @ 8:16 pm

    Have you gone back to the post office and explained to them that you are not able to read the name of the signature. Isn’t it their problem or responsibility to make sure it’s readable? That’s why it requires a print also.

16. dr_taitz@yahoo.com
    October 12th, 2013 @ 4:05 am

    no need to go to the post office, the feds admitted that they got the pleadings and someone misplaced them

17. Torrance
    October 12th, 2013 @ 4:39 am

    Looks like a rubber-stamped signature:

    Evelyn Suarez

18. David Jamieson
    October 12th, 2013 @ 1:10 pm

    The last name of the 2nd signature looks to me like “Utz”. I used to work with a man with the same last name.

Leave a Reply