Questions re prior cases
Posted on | August 22, 2010 | No Comments
Orly,
Can you enlighten me on this?
“One issue, never clear, which I wish Major La Rocque had addressed, was a verbal promise made to Dr. Taitz to hold discovery hearings when the defense failed to respond within the required time to the original complaint? Taitz’ web site was being savaged by Internet assassins, and it was not easy to follow, or to ask questions, which was probably the intent of the web attacks.
The issue, which I know someone can clarify, has to do with the response by the court to a failure to respond to a legal challenge. Government attorneys had some weeks, possibly in April of 2009, to respond toTaitz’original suit. My recollection is that Taitz had the legal right to force discovery immediately –the defense had forfit the case. Judge Carter agreed, but pleaded with Taitz, on his honor, to give the government attorneys time to get their response together, and promised, whatever happened in the first hearing, to allow discovery –to provide the prosecution and defense the legal authority to supeana documents. Why else would Taitz forgo the right to represent her military plaintiffs, Alan Keyes, and others in April? It appears that she trusted the honor of a Marine. Her plaintiffs might have a reason to question her judgement, and she will probably not make that mistake again, but since the delay was requested by Judge Carter based upon a promise of discovery, there is apparently no honor or justice for the moment. Some say a verbal agreement is a contract?”
David LaRocque
Answer:
|
you can read the pleadings and transcripts.
Judge Carter threatened that he will dismiss the case, if I don’t agree to serve the gov yet again. He told me that if I agree to serve Obama “the way the government wants” the case will be heard on the merits, If I don’t agree to serve them, than he will dismiss and it will dwell for a year in the 9th circuit. after wards he turned around and dismissed on technicality-standing and jurisdiction: he defrauded me and the plaintiffs and the whole country. Read my appeal in the 9th circuit: it is all there.
Judge Land showed no honor and simply used his courtroom for a hit job on me. He said that it was frivolous to question Obama, but refused to give me discovery or a hearing to prove that it was not frivolous. Higher courts simply rubber stamped the hit job by Land. (that is provided the pleadings were even seen by any judges and not 100 percent handled by the clerks)
What do you do, when the courts themselves are the tools to defraud, assault, denigrate and defame people?
In this situation you no longer have a system of justice. You have some type of Chicago mafia running the country with no recourse for the citizens, but to revolt.
I used to believe in the system of justice in the US. I no longer believe in it.
|
Comments
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 
