Press release: While AL Supreme Court denied the appeal in McInnish in a 7-2 decision, Attorney Taitz will submit the argument of 2 dissenting judges: Moore and Parker, to the courts where here cases are still pending
Posted on | March 21, 2014 | 13 Comments
Press release:
Law Offices of Orly Taitz
AL Supreme Court denied the appeal in McInnish in a 7-2 decision, however Attorney Orly Taitz will submit the argument of 2 dissenting judges: Chief Judge Roy Moore and Thomas Parker, to the courts where her cases are still pending, specifically to the 9th circuit, where Chief Judge Kozinsky already expressed his opinion that Secretary of State has a right and a duty to vet the candidates. At an oral argument he stated paraphrasing that without such vetting a party can place a dog on the ballot.
Also, Judge Parker stated that the plaintiffs could forward their decision that Obama is not eligible to their representatives in Congress. In Grinols et al v Electoral College, Congress, Secretary of State and Governor of CA, brought by Attorney Taitz, US Attorneys Benjamin Wagner and Ed Olsen defrauded the court, the U.S. Congress and the Electoral Colleges by lying to the judge and claiming that they are representing the U.S. Congress and US electoral College, while Taitz received statements of members of the electoral College and Congress stating that these US Attorneys, who are supposed to uphold the law, are lying, that they never notified members of Congress and Members of the electoral College. Presiding judge, Hon. Morrison England, received this information and became complicit with these 2 US Attorneys by canceling the hearing on motion by Taitz to recuse these 2 US Attorneys for lying to Congress and the judge subsequently dismissed the case on a motion by the US Congress, which knew nothing about the case, claiming that he does not have jurisdiction, even though he admitted that at least one of the plaintiffs, Candidate for President Keith Judd, who won 40% in the WV primary, has standing to sue. This represents a criminal collusion by the Department of Justice, represented by the US Attorneys Wagner and Olsen and the Judicial branch represented by the presiding Judge, a criminal conspiracy by the Executive and Judicial Branches to defraud and deprive of power the Legislative Branch, the US Congress. If the 9th Circuit will cover this up, the 9th Circuit will become criminally complicit, will become a part of this RICO to defraud the US Congress, Electoral College and American people. Taitz believes that the 9th Circuit and judges in her pending cases in MS, MD and DC will not do that. Judge Wingate in MS in one of her cases already forwarded to the US Attorney for the Southern District of MS some of the evidence in the case and requested criminal investigation.
The Alabama Supreme Court decision is posted at link below
Comments
13 Responses to “Press release: While AL Supreme Court denied the appeal in McInnish in a 7-2 decision, Attorney Taitz will submit the argument of 2 dissenting judges: Moore and Parker, to the courts where here cases are still pending”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

March 21st, 2014 @ 9:52 am
Just amazing. Secretary of States whether at state or federal level just don’t have to do their jobs. How cushy.
March 21st, 2014 @ 11:51 am
Another reason why Alabama’s state motto is “Thank God for Mississippi”
March 21st, 2014 @ 12:08 pm
I’m sorry Justice Bolin. You are basically saying just like the Obamacare quote from Pelosi, ” We have to pass it to know what’s in it”. The old, cart before the horse analogy. Also, Justice Bolin, you are saying, “Politics trumps the U.S. Constitution”. You are wrong, wrong, wrong.
March 21st, 2014 @ 12:20 pm
Why isn’t Judge Moore fast-tracking this case? The arguments should have already been heard, and a judgement handed down, and finally an indictment of the fraud, with subsequent impeachment proceedings.
March 21st, 2014 @ 12:28 pm
Finally two judges that stood up and were counted. They both gave earlier opinions and STOOD BY THEIR EARLIER COMMENTS. Unlike many years ago, Judge Carter said to Orly; “I have the power.” And, then later Carter came into court, a changed Judge and ruled against Orly. A small victory, at least two Judges stood and upheld their sworn duty…….. There still maybe some hope for this country……
March 21st, 2014 @ 1:00 pm
I hope you do sent the opinion of those two judges. I have children who are born in america from american girls. They might be able to be president someday if you kep up this good works.
March 21st, 2014 @ 3:10 pm
well, these judges issued an opinion, when they knew that it did not matter because the ruling went to BO
March 21st, 2014 @ 3:15 pm
what fast tracking? the case was dismissed without any argument, as predicted
March 21st, 2014 @ 3:54 pm
I don’t have words. Just…. Thank you ORLY.
March 21st, 2014 @ 4:04 pm
Dr. Taitz is correct. We all need to understand that the dissenting judges felt free to dissent only because they knew the outcome did not depend upon their participation in the majority decision, that Obama was still going to be protected. People in Congress do this all the time. When will people wise up and not be fooled by such deception?
March 21st, 2014 @ 5:17 pm
The duties of the Secretary of State is defined by each state’s Constitution.
March 21st, 2014 @ 8:35 pm
Disobedience to tyrants is Obedience to God.” -Benjamin Franklin.
That phrase above stated by one of our founding fathers is so appropriate
to what many millions of patriots will be doing in DC starting on May 16,2014.
Benjamin Franklin would be proud. We are going in a peaceful manner ( non-violent )
to wake up the people in power in DC to get rid of all the corrupt leaders in federal government who do not take their oaths of office and the Constitution seriously . Abuses of power is in DC is the norm not the exception . We The People will try to
do our best under the Constitution and the rule of law to make things right.
Many of these leaders’ actions could be even treasonous.
This Operation American Spring , modeled after the Egyptian Spring ( 33 million people converged on Cairo last year and got rid of the Muslim Brotherhood gov. and president ) will not be a cake walk . There will be dangers abound but millions of
compatriots will watch your back. Check out this movement we are embarking on at http://www.patriotsforameria.ning.com and http://www.operationamericanspring.org and then join us. You can obtain templates for OAS flyers and pass the flyers around everywhere you can. Tell your friends and neighbors to pass the word and also show up in DC. If you cannot make the trip which I hope you will be able to, support someone who is able and willing. It is time to make a stand for your country. One person can make a difference. President JFK said, ” ASK NOT WHAT YOUR COUNTRY CAN DO FOR YOU, BUT ASK WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR YOUR COUNTRY. So, enought is enough. We The People are tired of watching our country and Constitution being flushed down the toilet. It is time for action and so, ” LET’S ROLL !!!!
March 22nd, 2014 @ 10:49 am
Hello Orly Regarding those self inducted RICO Act lying Attorneys consider petitioning Congress to hold vote of INHERENT CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS vs Obscama and these attorneys in which Congress who have already impeached Obscama 5/2012 can jail him and his cohorts. Congress can vote this adding to reason they Impeached him in 2012 abuse of executive orders (over 1000) and unilateral declaring war in Syria, Libya and Egypt with Congressional circumvention. http://www.House.gov
March 22nd, 2014 @ 11:20 am
The majority decision is bending over backwards to say that the Sec of State doesn’t have to do anything when she receives evidence of identity fraud in a state election. I’m sure that Alabama has laws against identity fraud and also has laws against misprision of felony which require the Sec of State to report evidence of a felony to the court or the state attorney general who do have the power to investigate or send it to a grand jury to investigate. The Sec has the same obligation to report that all citizens have to follow. The judge writing the majority decision acts as if the Sec of State is working in a vacuum with no assistance at all from any other government agency. It’s judicial tunnel vision.