Reader’s view: History proves value of an armed citizenry

7 hours ago

7 Responses to “one of the three main legal research engines, legalnews.findlaw.com is following this site”

1. Trish
   February 26th, 2013 @ 7:42 am

   Must concede that I just recently started to take notice of your campaign via POTUS, while noting the fervor growing across the political divide. For your consideration would like to pose this question, WHY not contact Bob Woodward in Washington, confident of the facts, and surely you know he was “NutCracker via Watergate”. Moreover, the transparent POTUS owns the Scare-ester tactics, and respectfully I attach a link to Woodward’s investigation. OF course, all know that his facts are accurate, the dichotomy is he is respected credible source. The inclination, t if Woodward joined your research perhaps this would facilitate your campaign. Thank you for taking the time to consider the possibility. https://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/right-cheers-bob-woodward-fact-check-88074.html?hp=l7

2. Francisco
   February 26th, 2013 @ 8:03 am

   After a week and half since Dr.Orly Taitz’ case, 12A606, was reviewed in Conference by the full Supreme Court, and with most of the other cases having been denied Certiorari, case 12A606 is still pending for an Order.

3. Ken
   February 26th, 2013 @ 9:57 am

   Yes. And it will be still pending 3 years from now!

4. Ken
   February 26th, 2013 @ 9:57 am

   Yes. And it will be still pending 3 years from now!

5. Conny
   February 26th, 2013 @ 3:59 pm

   Seems like the case was denied on Feb. 19.

   https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

6. Francisco
   February 26th, 2013 @ 5:37 pm

   Conny
   Case 12A606, no Order have been given as of this very moment.
   Go to ‘Search’ in the SCOTUS web, type ‘Order 2/19/2012’, and hit search. In the list that appears, hit at the top where the above date appears, a calendar would appear, hit 19 for February nineteen, go to the left of the screen and hit ‘Order’, and then ‘Order” again
   a list would appear, hit on 2/19/2013 Order List, and look down to 12A606, and you’ll see the Order for Certiorari has not been denied, while 95 % of the other cases, it was denied.

7. Francisco
   February 27th, 2013 @ 9:09 am

   Orly, not being a lawyer, I would not try to venture a guess or read in the tea leaves, what might be the meaning that after the SCOTUS Conference of 2/15/2013, almost two week after it occurred, and with most of the other cases having been denied Certoriari, case No. 12A606, still has not been adjudicated.
   Do you have a positive or negative feeling about this obvious delay on the part of the Supreme Court, in rendering a decision ?

Leave a Reply