
One HUGE Mystery About CA Terror Attack Still Unsolved– People Are Demanding Answers
Posted on | December 11, 2015 | 1 Comment
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
One Response to “One HUGE Mystery About CA Terror Attack Still Unsolved– People Are Demanding Answers”
Leave a Reply
-
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — Indiana Trial of Obama, 2nd Copy
Evidence on Barack Obama
Obama File with Exhibits
Affidavit of Paul Irey
Obama file Exhibits 1 - 7
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 1
Obama file Exhibit 8 - Part 2
Obama file Exhibits 9-13
Obama file Exhibits 14-21
Request for Docs under FOIA and Emergency Motion for Reconsideration
Exhibits sent to Inspector Generals and CongressPetition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
URGENT! PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO CONGRESS
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Subscribe today to stay in touch with our progress. Send this channel out to your email lists. Thank you for your support. CHANNEL (Google Plus) SUBSCRIBE TO YOUTUBE

Official Facebook
Recent Posts
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687

--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------

Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------

--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
Pages
- #409755 (no title)
- …Defendant Obama defaulted in Grinols et al v Obama et al
- …Grinols Subpoenas
- ..Grinols Order, Summons, TRO, Complaint
- .Affidavit of Mike Zullo
- 1. Judd v Obama
- 2. Farrar v Obama
- 3. Taitz v Sebelius
- 4. Taitz v Indiana, IN Judge Orders Trial
- 5. Taitz v Astrue
- 6. Mississippi Filed Complaint Update
- 7. Taitz Walters v Sec of State Kansas
- Videos
- Video: Orly before NH Election Committee










December 11th, 2015 @ 10:56 am
https://www.westernjournalism.com/one-huge-mystery-about-ca-terror-attack-still-unsolved-people-are-demanding-answers/
One HUGE Mystery About CA Terror Attack Still Unsolved– People Are Demanding Answers
“What gives, America? ”
Words like “coverup” are being bandied about across the Internet as the law enforcement narrative that only two shooters participated in last week’s San Bernardino remains contradicted by eyewitnesses. A fast closure to the shooting itself has further raised questions.
“Something smells rotten in San Bernardino,” wrote Breitbart commentator Pamela Geller, who noted that all initial reports from the scene talked of three shooters.
“We saw three men dressed in all black, military attire, with vests on. They were holding assault rifles. As soon as they opened up the doors to building three one of them started to shoot into the room,” witness Sara Abdelmageed said at the time. “I just saw three dressed exactly the same.”
When asked if she was certain she saw three men, she replied, “Yes. It looked like their skin color was white. They look like they were athletic build and they appeared to be tall.”
Another eyewitness, Juan Hernandez, reported seeing “three white men in military fatigues.”
Mark Stutte relayed the words of his daughter, who was at the scene that “three gunmen came in and they started shooting people.”
Then, suddenly, the number went from three to two after police killed Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik. No further attempt was made to find the third person.
Suspicions were heightened when the suspects’ home was opened to journalists.
“I was shocked…when the unthinkable happened after the murders: a mob of reporters were let into the jihad killers’ home in large numbers, contaminating evidence left and right and obstructing an investigation that was ongoing,” Geller wrote.
Into this mix of questions came a report from witness Chris Nwadike, who told reporters he received a phone call from an unknown person on the night of the shooting, telling him to say that Farook was the gunman. “No it’s not him [Farook]. I told them about it. He’s quiet. He doesn’t make any trouble. He was just spraying bullets everywhere. But the gunman was not Syed, or his wife,” Nwadike said.
“Something stinks here,” wrote Arnold Ahlert at The American Spectator. “Given the track record of Islamic terror denialism embraced by the Obama administration – along with innumerable examples of media malfeasance protecting that approach – the unmistakable odor of a coverup, or an orchestrated disinformation campaign, hangs heavy in the air.”
Radio host Rush Limbaugh has also pondered the question.
Third shooter? Who, what, when, where, why? Is there one? Was there one? Two witnesses said they saw one. The media reported third shooter. But nobody’s had any interest in tracking a shooter down,” Limbaugh said Wednesday.
“So, what gives, America? Did that third suspect drop off the edge of the earth?” wrote Stu Tarlowe at WND.
“Did he or she disappear in the same way that our ability and willingness to recognize and identify a terrorist act when we see it seems to have disappeared? Or have we collectively forgotten how to count? Have we now become a nation of the arithmetically challenged, the journalistically challenged and the cognitively challenged?” he wrote.
Geller summed up the lingering questions.
“Where is the third man? Is he still at large? Are people at risk? And why was the apartment opened up and the fingerprint evidence destroyed? Why was evidence strewn about?” she wrote.
“Something is rotten in the state of California,” she concluded.