10 Responses to “Obama regime is figting back and blocking the truth. I need help of computer experts to clean my site, so people can continue to fight the disinformation and lies of Obama regime”

1. Starla
   May 20th, 2011 @ 10:44 am

   “STATES OF REBELLION – HOW LEGISLATORS AND GOVERNORS NATIONWIDE ARE CHALLENGING A ROGUE PRESIDENT”

   © 2011 WND
   April 5, 2011

   Excerpt:

   “While millions of outraged Americans protest what they see as a lawless and power-mad Obama administration, many wonder how much clout individuals can really have in reining in a wildly out-of-control government.

   But suppose, in addition to citizens with little power beyond their vote, those standing up to the federal government were named Virginia, Texas, Arizona, Utah, Wyoming, New Hampshire, Tennessee, Montana, Maine, South Dakota – and many more?

   Incredibly, though under-reported by the establishment press, that’s exactly what is happening right now, as the April issue of Whistleblower documents in-depth, in “STATES OF REBELLION: How legislators and governors nationwide are openly challenging a rogue president.”

   Read more: STATES OF REBELLION
   http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=283237#ixzz1Mv4RjGPh

2. Starla
   May 20th, 2011 @ 10:57 am

   “WAR? WE DON’T NEED NO STEENKING
   DECLARATION!”

   The Market Ticker ® – Commentary on The Capital Markets

   By Karl Denninger

   Posted 2011-05-20

   “Barack….

   U.S. operations in Libya hit the 60-day mark Friday, but Congress has grown largely silent on the administration’s unilateral intervention into the war-torn North African nation.

   The 1973 War Powers Act (WPA) — the statute President Obama invoked when he launched forces in March — requires presidents to secure congressional approval for military operations within 60 days, or withdraw forces within the next 30.

   Mo-Barack doesn’t care. His entire administration does not care, and neither does Congress.

   Look folks, let’s sum up the entire primary question: Do we have a sitting President who is ineligible?

   • Is the “birth certificate” authentic? There are plenty of questions, even now. They could be resolved in 30 minutes by a handful of forensic examiners who, if allowed, could go look at the original Hawaiian records (paper, microfilm and electronic) and see what’s there. A 50 year old piece of paper will be able to be validated as actually 50 years old. If it’s not….

   • Did Obama take an affirmative act after his 18th birthday in furtherance of foreign citizenship? We know, by his own written admission in his books and speeches along with his “birth certificate” that he had dual citizenship at birth, as his father was a British subject. His adoption clouds the issue further, especially if he was ever traveling on a foreign passport. Among them, all of which have been sealed by executive order (why?):

   • School records: Was any claim made for foreign student aid? Who paid the bills? What’s on the admissions paperwork? What social security number was given to the colleges?

   • Foreign and US Passport records: Was he traveling on a foreign passport after the age of 18? More to the point, did he renew a foreign passport at or after the age of 18? The latter, in a nation that did not at the time recognize dual citizenship, would be an act of renunciation from the US perspective and would instantly and permanently render him ineligible. Since Obama has stated he was traveling in foreign lands after his 18th birthday, why is this not a legitimate area of inquiry? Expired US passports are returned when you renew; I have my old, expired one that was sent back with my renewal. Show us a US Passport that was valid on your 18th birthday Barack – or were you traveling on a foreign one in your young adulthood?

   • Social Security number and property tax number questions: There are too many here to list. In fact this guy’s record in those areas looks like someone trying to hide something. In the case of the Chicago property records it’s ridiculously convoluted. Remember, this guy was a nobody until he ran for the Senate. Or was he? Maybe there’s an innocent explanation and maybe there’s not. Let’s have the facts and vet ’em.

   In short there’s more than enough here to raise eyebrows. Then there’s the ever-changing story on Bin Laden. Yeah, I believe we got him, just like I believe Obama was born in the US. That “birth certificate” is too poor of a fake to be convincing to anyone who has a decent understanding of digital imaging – so either the Administration is interminably stupid and cannot manage basic document tasks or it was intentionally assembled and disseminated as a fraud (raising the question as to whether that’s illegal) to “draw fire” from the real issues (intentional acts taken after his 18th birthday that might have renounced his US ties) and perhaps something else that was simming out there with his Chicago time and ties (the entire Rezco/Blago thing, none of which is clear to anyone at this point.)

   Who knows what the truth is; what we do know for a fact, however, is that the press failed to do its job of vetting and publicly exposing and disposing of these issues before the election in 2008.

   The point, however, is that having successfully managed to threaten the press with “loss of pool access” repeatedly and beginning with a “Messiah presumption” – literally any disagree with him or his policies get you instantly labeled a racist – the “minor little detail” called The Constitution, when it comes to war, doesn’t even rank as an annoyance.

   This is what happens when you allow the camel to stick his nose under the tent, just as we did with the so-called “War on Drugs” where we allow seizure of property without any evidence that a crime was committed, “warrantless wiretaps” and similar nonsense.

   Now we have an Administration that has arrogated to itself the power to declare War – a power that is explicitly delegated to Congress in the Constitution.

   But heh, after shredding the 2nd, 4th, 5th and 10th Amendments, never mind successfully preventing a robust inquiry into eligibility for the Presidency in the first place, what’s just one more little thing, right?

   The destruction of our Constitutional form of government is nearly complete.”

   * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

   We The People ARE THE POWER of the USA government. The destruction of the USA government is not complete, NOT BY A LONG-SHOT!!!!! We The People MUST fight the good fight and have the lawless criminals arrested in the USA.

3. Starla
   May 20th, 2011 @ 11:56 am

   MUST SEE EXCELLENT VIDEO!!

   “DR. STEVE PIECZENIK & ALEX JONES – FULL INTERVIEW (5-3-11)”

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjtNiTm99e8&feature=related

4. Kevin S, DVM
   May 20th, 2011 @ 12:14 pm

   Congressman Allen West Response to President Barack Obama’s Call for a Two State Solution in Israel

   (WASHINGTON) — Congressman Allen West (FL-22) released this statement today:

   “Today’s endorsement by President Barack Obama of the creation of a Hamas-led Palestinian state based on the pre-1967 borders, signals the most egregious foreign policy decision his administration has made to date, and could be the beginning of the end as we know it for the Jewish state.

   From the moment the modern day state of Israel declared statehood in 1948, to the end of the 1967 Six Day War, Jews were forbidden access to their holiest site, the Western Wall in Jerusalem’s Old City, controlled by Jordan’s Arab army.

   The pre-1967 borders endorsed by President Obama would deny millions of the world’s Jews access to their holiest site and force Israel to return the strategically important Golan Heights to Syria, a known state-sponsor of terrorism.

   Resorting to the pre-1967 borders would mean a full withdrawal by the Israelis from the West Bank and the Jewish neighborhoods of East Jerusalem. Make no mistake, there has always been a Nation of Israel and Jerusalem has been and must always be recognized as its rightful capital.

   In short, the Hamas-run Palestinian state envisioned by President Obama would be devastating to Israel and the world’s 13.3 million Jews. It would be a Pavlovian style reward to a declared Islamic terrorist organization, and an unacceptable policy initiative.

   America should never negotiate with the Palestinian Authority- which has aligned itself with Hamas. Palestine is a region, not a people or a modern state. Based upon Roman Emperor Hadrian’s declaration in 73 AD, the original Palestinian people are the Jewish people.

   It’s time for the American people to stand by our strongest ally, the Jewish State of Israel, and reject this foreign policy blunder of epic proportions.

   While the winds of democracy may blow strong in the Middle East, history has demonstrated that gaps in leadership can lead to despotic regimes. I have questions for President Obama: ‘Who will now lead in Egypt?’ and ‘Why should American taxpayers provide foreign aid to a nation where the next chapter in their history may be the emergence of another radical Islamic state?’

   President Obama has not stood for Israel or the Jewish people and has made it clear where the United States will stand when Palestine attempts to gain recognition of statehood by the United Nations. The President should focus on the real obstacle to security- the Palestinian leadership and its ultimate goal to eliminate Israel and the Jewish people.”

   https://west.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4216:congressman-allen-west-response-to-president-barack-obamas-call-for-a-two-state-solution-in-israel&catid=73:press-releases&Itemid=2

5. Starla
   May 20th, 2011 @ 1:33 pm

   An Excellent Comment From: https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/obama-2012-made-in-the-usa-made-definition-fictitious-invented-obama-attorneys-paid-in-the-usa-with-taxpayer-dollars/#comments

   “Jonah | May 19, 2011 at 5:37 pm |

   Congressman Allen West’s Response to President Barack Obama’s Call for a Two State Solution in Israel

   (WASHINGTON) — Congressman Allen West (FL-22) released this statement today:

   “Today’s endorsement by President Barack Obama of the creation of a Hamas-led Palestinian state based on the pre-1967 borders, signals the most egregious foreign policy decision his administration has made to date, and could be the beginning of the end as we know it for the Jewish state.

   From the moment the modern day state of Israel declared statehood in 1948, to the end of the 1967 Six Day War, Jews were forbidden access to their holiest site, the Western Wall in Jerusalem’s Old City, controlled by Jordan’s Arab army.

   The pre-1967 borders endorsed by President Obama would deny millions of the world’s Jews access to their holiest site and force Israel to return the strategically important Golan Heights to Syria, a known state-sponsor of terrorism.

   Resorting to the pre-1967 borders would mean a full withdrawal by the Israelis from the West Bank and the Jewish neighborhoods of East Jerusalem. Make no mistake, there has always been a Nation of Israel and Jerusalem has been and must always be recognized as its rightful capital.

   In short, the Hamas-run Palestinian state envisioned by President Obama would be devastating to Israel and the world’s 13.3 million Jews. It would be a Pavlovian style reward to a declared Islamic terrorist organization, and an unacceptable policy initiative.

   America should never negotiate with the Palestinian Authority- which has aligned itself with Hamas. Palestine is a region, not a people or a modern state. Based upon Roman Emperor Hadrian’s declaration in 73 AD, the original Palestinian people are the Jewish people.

   It’s time for the American people to stand by our strongest ally, the Jewish State of Israel, and reject this foreign policy blunder of epic proportions.

   While the winds of democracy may blow strong in the Middle East, history has demonstrated that gaps in leadership can lead to despotic regimes. I have questions for President Obama: ‘Who will now lead in Egypt?’ and ‘Why should American taxpayers provide foreign aid to a nation where the next chapter in their history may be the emergence of another radical Islamic state?’

   President Obama has not stood for Israel or the Jewish people and has made it clear where the United States will stand when Palestine attempts to gain recognition of statehood by the United Nations. The President should focus on the real obstacle to security- the Palestinian leadership and its ultimate goal to eliminate Israel and the Jewish people.”

   https://west.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4216:congressman-allen-west-response-to-president-barack-obamas-call-for-a-two-state-solution-in-israel&catid=73:press-releases&Itemid=2

6. Florence Stone
   May 20th, 2011 @ 10:30 pm

   Link works for me, with no problems.

7. Braulio
   May 20th, 2011 @ 10:57 pm

   Thank you Dr Taitz for holding on, we really fear for you, the enemy is attacking. God bless you and protect you. You are writing history.

8. Brian
   May 21st, 2011 @ 5:22 am

   I’m sorry. Didn’t mean to say this wasn’t happening to your site. I’d go a step further and say I feel my email and phone calls (services which I PAY for as PRIVATE connections) are electronically snooped at all times. I was saying, however, there are incidental virus infections as well. Can’t give the g.a.’s credit for everything gone wrong.

Leave a Reply