NY Times tries to rebuild its’ reputation after turning Benghazi report into regime propaganda piece. Does anyone still believe that there is any journalistic integrity in NY Times, LA times, Wash Post, Huff Post., Yahoo, Wikipedia, Alphabet TV channels, Clear channel communications stations? They are all dying as the public is fed up with their pathological lying
Posted on | January 2, 2014 | 8 Comments
Considering the enormous value of the information he has revealed, and the abuses he has exposed, Mr. Snowden deserves better than a life of permanent exile, fear and flight.
|
Comments
8 Responses to “NY Times tries to rebuild its’ reputation after turning Benghazi report into regime propaganda piece. Does anyone still believe that there is any journalistic integrity in NY Times, LA times, Wash Post, Huff Post., Yahoo, Wikipedia, Alphabet TV channels, Clear channel communications stations? They are all dying as the public is fed up with their pathological lying”
Leave a Reply


.jpg)










29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

January 2nd, 2014 @ 7:50 am
YES ALL THE DEAD FROM CEMETERY ,THEY VOTE FOR O CA CA
January 2nd, 2014 @ 7:57 am
They would just betray him when he returned anyway.
January 2nd, 2014 @ 8:48 am
of course, it is a trick to get him back and execute him
January 2nd, 2014 @ 9:59 am
I do not trust any msm news source anymore; not even Fox. I too believe it’s a trap and I feel pretty sure that Snowden does too.
January 2nd, 2014 @ 11:33 am
Yeah…if I were him, I’d find a nice secluded location somewhere tropical and drink mint julips for the rest of his life!
The establishment can-NOT be trusted-EVER!
January 2nd, 2014 @ 2:36 pm
There are a few who are making an attempt. For instance, Greta Van Susteren did a piece last night on “The Knockout Game.” I feel like there are journalists out there with journalistic integrity who feel it is their obligation to get the truth out to the American people but once it reaches the editors desk it gets quashed. Either that or they are assassinated altogether which creates fear in reporting fact.
January 2nd, 2014 @ 7:26 pm
Because Fox claims to be “fair and balanced” and is still trusted by many conservatives, they are biggest disappointment of all.
Fox and their talking heads spend an endless amount of time on various “issues” with the Obama regime, while steadfastly ignoring the one issue that matters; Obama is an ineligible, identity fraud con-artist who, with the assistance of both political parties, has usurped the presidency of the United States of America.
Fox legitimizes Obama by treating him as if he is a legitimate president, and they either ignore, or mock and ridicule, those like Orly who are fighting to fully expose and force action on the biggest fraud in history.
Fox is not a friend of the truth on the one issue that could make moot many of the other atrocities of the Obama regime, his ineligibility and identity fraud.
January 3rd, 2014 @ 6:15 am
Bob, A MAJOR portion of”FOX” was purchased by a Saudi Prince, shortly AFTER Obama/Soetoro was Elected. They were FORCED to Stop being “Fair & Balanced”.
My personal Opinion… Polygraph Tests for ALL Media Members AND Politicians… If They FAIL :
Capital Punishment, NO APPEALS!!!