More explanation
Posted on | June 5, 2013 | 6 Comments
One can bring a 60B motion for reconsideration any time he gets new information. For example, suddenly one finds a DNA of a person who committed a crime, when a new witness comes forward. For this reason there is a 60 B motion.
I got new information, the name of the person who was the rightful owner of the SSN in question.
With this information I filed on May 23, 2013 a new motion for reconsideration. Previously Lamberth refused to release the SS-5, application for SSN 042-68-4425, because he claimed privacy rights, even though he had in front of him a SSNVS and E-Verify reports showing that the number did not belong to Obama, even though it was used by Obama.
Now I showed him the evidence: this SSN was issued to Harrison J. Bounel, he was born in 1890. According to a 120 year rule of SSA he is obligated to grant my motion. So Lamberth is trying to get out of it by hiding the motion and the evidence and by allowing a criminal with a flagrantly stolen Social Security number to continue usurping the position of the U.S. President and destroying this country. This makes Judge Lamberth complicit in the cover up of forgery, identity theft, IRS fraud, Social Security fraud and a host of other crimes committed by Obama.
Please, keep calling Goodlatte, Issa and the rest of the US Congress. They all know what is going on. I do not know what are they waiting for. It is time for them to act and start Congressional hearings on this issue .
Comments
6 Responses to “More explanation”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

June 5th, 2013 @ 6:03 pm
thanks for explaining that.
GO go go Orly
June 6th, 2013 @ 3:16 am
Dear Orly: Sen Rubio seems to want to see evidence of Birth Certificate Fraud.
Sharon Rondeau is reporting (THE POST EMAIL) that Rubio was skyping with THE VILLAGES TEA PARTY:
————-
Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida told a Tea Party town hall meeting on Monday that … he had not heard of any “evidence” being produced to show that Obama’s documents are fraudulent
—
The Article then goes on to report:
He then began speaking very quickly, saying, “If that birth certificate was fraudulent,…someone would have turned up that evidence by now.”
June 6th, 2013 @ 3:18 am
PS: even though Rubio makes a good impression, his nose must be growing as it is impossible that he has “not heard” about B/C fraud. The RNC hears it every day from members who are REFUSING to donate any money until the elected officials get off their tuchus to do something.
June 6th, 2013 @ 4:01 am
Did Huffington Post ever do what you demanded of them? It has been over 10 days.
https://orlytaitzesq.com/?p=422221
This Lamberth is not doing what you demand. Can you sue him?
June 6th, 2013 @ 5:56 am
“I got new infomation”. Does this mean you have physical evidence that connects bounel to obamas ss#?