OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

More evidence of criminal complicity of Yahoo.com, which publishes an article by a far left prof. challenging eligibility of Cruz, but refusing to report on Obama’s lack of any valid IDs and his use of a stolen Social Security number and all fabricated IDs. One day Yahoo and Google and the rest of the lap dog media will be tried for criminal complicity

Posted on | October 28, 2013 | 5 Comments

Is Ted Cruz a natural-born citizen eligible to serve as president?

Sarah Helene Duggin from the Catholic University of America looks at potential foreign-born presidential candidates like Ted Cruz and a possible emerging

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

5 Responses to “More evidence of criminal complicity of Yahoo.com, which publishes an article by a far left prof. challenging eligibility of Cruz, but refusing to report on Obama’s lack of any valid IDs and his use of a stolen Social Security number and all fabricated IDs. One day Yahoo and Google and the rest of the lap dog media will be tried for criminal complicity”

  1. Rich
    October 28th, 2013 @ 9:12 am

    Cruz is an opportunity for liberals to justify Obama’s illegal candidacy. We have plenty of natural born citizens to choose from. Cruz most likely would be a great president but it is just a bait and switch game by democrats. The democrats are masters of corruption.

  2. Red, White and Blue
    October 28th, 2013 @ 3:54 pm

    It’s too bad that Cruz is not eligible…but I saw someone from US News and World Report on Saturday evening bad mouth Cruz and tell the world that he’s too conservative!

    And this person actually said that he thought Jeb Bush was a more likely candidate for President!! As Jeb is a little more moderate!!
    Too much!!!

  3. Russell Bennett
    October 28th, 2013 @ 4:12 pm

    Both of Ted Cruzs Parents are American Citizens. I dont think his dad was at the time Ted was Born.The purpose of the requirements is to prevent a Person with loyaites to a foreign country from becoming President.The question is do the Parents have to be citizens at the time of Birth or at the time of Election.I think the latter is more important of the two. At the time of Election a parent could have moved back to their former country and had given op their citizenship and the son or daughter would still qualify and possible have loyalties to another country.

  4. Don in Tennessee
    October 28th, 2013 @ 7:11 pm

    Russell Bennett, the parents “must” be citizens at the time of birth and the child “must” be born in the United States of America.

    Cruz was born in Canada, his father was a Cuban and his mother was an American at the time of his birth.

    If being a citizen is all that is required, then why did the Founding Fathers put a grandfather clause in the requirements? They would have been citizens and eligible.

  5. RacerJim
    October 29th, 2013 @ 10:16 am

    The author of the article said that no Court has defined “natural born Citizen” but, as we all know, SCOTUS case Minor v Happersett did in fact define “natural born Citizen” as born in the country to citizen parents of the country.

Leave a Reply