More clarifications
Posted on | December 6, 2011 | 6 Comments
Somebody wrote to me that he saw a clip on channel 8 and he thought that the judge had the amended complaint
Here is the explanation
no, she said that she had the reply to the opposition to the amended motion, but she did not have the amended motion. By the way, there was tampering with reply as well. I sent it by Fed Ex, Fed Ex called me on the day before the hearing and told me, that the clerk of the court refused to accept it, because one letter somewhere looked different. I wasted $78 on FedEx. So, I simply went to FedEX store, printed out new copies and hand delivered them to the court and the clerk of the judge the day before the hearing. Sorry, this is sabotaqge, worse than in the Soviet Union. This should not be hapening
Comments
6 Responses to “More clarifications”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

December 6th, 2011 @ 11:05 am
you are right this shouldnt be happening but with a corrupt legal system and all the way up to the DOJ protecting this usurping idiot, something has to be done..
its time for people to take back their legal systemm by whatever means …. let the govt know in uncertain terms we are fed up with this crap…
especially the DOJ we see the news how the “just us” system is working.. those idiots ar supposed to PROTECT US not protect themselves and the unconstitutional idiot who has taken over our country
December 24th, 2011 @ 11:43 am
… [Trackback]…
[…] Read More: orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28684 […]…
December 30th, 2011 @ 11:30 am
… [Trackback]…
[…] Find More Informations here: orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28684 […]…
January 26th, 2012 @ 1:35 pm
… [Trackback]…
[…] Find More Informations here: orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28684 […]…
February 2nd, 2012 @ 4:59 pm
… [Trackback]…
[…] Read More here: orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28684 […]…
February 22nd, 2012 @ 3:35 am
… [Trackback]…
[…] Read More: orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28684 […]…