---

From: Rwgemail@aol.com
To: rwgemail@aol.com
Sent: 1/2/2011 5:05:37 P.M. Pacific Standard Time
Subj: John Roberts #4

 

With the utmost respect for you, Chief Justice Roberts, I am compelled to contact you and comment on The Wall Street Journal Article in which you allegedly ‘decry’ what you describe as  ‘brawling’ over Judicial nominees.

This ‘brawling’ description of the Constitutionally mandated responsibility of the United States Senate to advise and consent, on Presidential nominations to the courts of our country, reflects a frankly appalling lack of understanding, ON YOUR PART, of the state of our country, and the perils we face in the immediate and far reaching future.

Judicial activism is at the core of the problems we are facing in this country and we, the people are fighting to restore the judicial system to its proper place within the Constitution.  The only way we, the people, can achieve this laudable goal is to ‘brawl’ in the halls of the U. S. Senate and fight tooth and nail to see that judicial activists are not confirmed to lifetime positions from which they can destroy the country with impunity.

We are inundated throughout the country, and at every judicial level, with blatantly activist judges, already appointed and confirmed to lifetime positions on the courts of the nation, who are inventing and creating  implausible rationales to justify inflicting and mandating their own personal agendas on all citizens, of what the future of the United States should be — AS INDISPUTABLE LAW. 

The Founding Fathers miraculously granted us a system wherein the sole mandate of the judicial system was to uphold the U.S. Constitution; not to rewrite it based on personal objectives. Our system was designed to adjudicate, based solely on Constitutionality, what Congress in its collective wisdom created as law on behalf of the citizenry.

And, most importantly, the judicial system was NOT created to thumb its nose at the will of the majority of citizens and especially NOT to obliterate the mandated will of the people of the United States with the flourish of a pen — based on personal vendettas.  

Perhaps you missed the awakening of the American people to the destruction of  the Constitution being perpetrated upon us by judicial activism?  It was shouted loud and clear on November 2, 2010, after the behavior of the judicial system and of Congress relative to Congress’ passive acquiescence in confirming and granting known activist judges a lifetime opportunity to insidiously advance incremental Constitutional reconstruction.

As just one example leading to the 2010 revolution, I cite the judicial activism in Iowa in which judges decided that the people of Iowa were not allowed to amend their own state Constitution to define the sanctity of marriage to be restricted to that unique relationship between one man and one woman. — AFTER THE PEOPLE OF IOWA VOTED OVERWHELMINGLY TO DO SO.  The people then decisively voted out all three of those judges who were up for retention and who were responsible for that abhorrent and unconstitutional decision. YET THAT DECISION RENDERED AGAINST THE MAJORITY  WILL OF THE PEOPLE REMAINS THE LAW OF IOWA — WITH NO RECOURSE BY THE MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE.

The core of the responsibility of the judicial system lies with those who are appointed to the courts.  It is NOT the Constitutional responsibility of the U. S. Senate to maintain an artificial balance on any court in the land between judges who uphold the Constitution and those who don’t, as is routinely used as justification today to confirm known liberal nominees; as witnessed by the two most recent nominees and confirmations to the U. S. Supreme Court — not to uphold the Constitution rather, TO MAINTAIN AN ARTIFICIAL BALANCE AND THE ‘STATUS QUO.’

Advise and Consent in no way can be construed to mean a responsibility to confirm judges, at the sole discretion of the president, if the president nominates anyone that will clearly strive, with an obvious agenda,  to reconstruct the Constitution rather than uphold its core tenets and principles.  The responsibility of the Senate is to confirm only those appointees who will uphold the existing Constitution; AND TO DECISIVELY REJECT THOSE WHO CLEARLY WON’T.

We, the people, in our awakening have sent an enormous number of new people to Washington to answer to the will of the people; replacing those who did not hear and accept our will.  And, we are making it clear that if the newcomers don’t stand up for the Constitution they, too, will quickly be replaced.  Answering to the will of the people means confirming judges that will uphold the Constitution.

There is a cadre in Washington and especially in the higher echelons of the current government, that is determined to rewrite the Constitution by any means possible.  When we, the people, and the existing Congress collectively refuse to submit legislatively to those who wish to refashion the Constitution, the standard procedure is to resort to the judicial system —  where judicial activists are glad to oblige with impunity.  Therefore, to protect the sanctity of the Constitution, the judicial system must be revamped to  stop this unconstitutional takeover of the country by judicial fiat!!!

The only method available to we, the people, to restore the judiciary to its proper place in the Constitution, and to counteract the agenda of those who specifically wish to reconstruct the Constitution, is to engage in any degree of  ‘brawling’ that is necessary to confirm only those judges that will uphold the Constitution.

I strongly suggest you rethink ‘brawling’ and understand that we, the people, are in a ‘war-to-the-death,’ metaphorically speaking, for the heart, soul and future of the United States of America that our Founding Fathers granted us; and if ‘brawling’ achieves a Constitutional future for the country, then may the Lord bless the United States of America in its ‘brawling’ to save the country!! 

It is so much more important to have judges that will  uphold the Constitution than it is to have every judicial slot filled!!!!  At least if the slots are vacant, the Constitution isn’t destroyed as quickly.  SO, STAY OUT OF THIS CRITICAL FRAY while we, the people, fight this out to a conclusion — that is our proper roll under the Constitution NOT YOURS.