Is this the solution to the mystery of the missing plane?
Posted on | March 17, 2014 | 12 Comments
Is this the solution to the mystery of the missing plane?
By Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Here is the conundrum: we know that MH 370 flew West and North-West, we know that it was detected by Malaysian military radar over Andaman islands, which are a territory of India, so with a 100% certainty the plane had to show on Indian commercial and military radars, or at least military radars, just as it appeared on Malaysian military radars. India claims that it did not appear on it’s radars.
Some are stating that the plane dropped to 5,000 ft to evade radar, however 5,000 feet will not be sufficient to evade radars, you need to drop to 100 feet or so to evade radars, and there is no indication of this happening and it would be extremely dangerous for a commercial airliner, which is not equipped for such evasion maneuvers, as the military planes.
Some are saying that the plane was going North -West and later turned sharply South-West, which explains it’s absence from radars of other countries, but that does not explain the fact that it was over Andaman islands, had to show on Indian radar and allegedly did not show.
Next conundrum. The plane had fuel only for 2,200 miles to fly after the pilot switched off the transponder. We know that it flew for about an hour, 500 miles to Andaman islands. From there it flew for 6 more hours and therefore covered 3,000-3,600 miles, but it had fuel only for 1,700 miles (2,200-5000=1,700). So, how did the plane fly 3 extra hours and some 1300-1,900 extra miles without fuel?
So, how do you solve these two conundrums?
Here is one possible solution that I thought of. We know that there is a way to take over the plane’s electronics so the plane will change course. It was demonstrated with planes, yachts and automobiles.
So, why can’t one have a device to either reprogram the plane’s transponder or simulate a transponder to transmit to towers a different identification?
If this happened, the plane could fly over any number of countries and transmit identification of another plane, which would look legitimate. This would explain, why no nation had any reports of a suspicious plane with switched off transponder flying over its’ territory, it would show a plane with a transponder, but transmitting a different identification. As a matter of fact, the plane could even land and refuel and fly further West.
Here is another point. I believe that the air traffic controllers expect certain planes of certain airlines flying certain routes at certain times, at certain hours of the day. So, the question is, whether there was a flight, which was supposed to fly in that general direction, at approximately the same time, but the flight was canceled the last moment, but air traffic controllers believed that this hijacked plane was a different plane?
So, the next thing to do, is look at any canceled flights. Next, it would be prudent for the countries in the possible flight corridor to search for planes that flew on March 8 between 1:30 am to 8:00 am (Malaysia time zone UTC +08.00), which had identification that was unusual, not what was expected or an identification of a flight which was canceled the last moment.
Further, I believe that the passengers are still alive. It was said that the pilot climbed to 45,000 feet and it could incapacitate the passengers, however the cabin in 777 is pressurized. Even if the plane were to climb to 45,000 feet, the cabin would be pressurized, as if it was at 8,000 feet and the passengers were not affected. Also, it was a red eye flight. I believe that most passengers were asleep. Also, when the plane turned around and flew West, it flew into the night, meaning it flew into the time zones, where it was still night, so the whole flight, 7 and a half hours they flew in darkness, they did not see dawn, so the passengers likely were asleep the whole time and did not know what was happening. Also, even if the plane had to refuel, the passengers could have been told that this is a necessary maintenance stop. Also, there was a difference in the length of the flight. Normally the flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing is 5:53, give or take 6 hours. They flew for 7 and a half hours. Most passengers, who were asleep, probably did not notice that they flew longer, the ones who noticed, were probably told that the flight took longer due to weather conditions or some technical problems.
What do you think?
Comments
12 Responses to “Is this the solution to the mystery of the missing plane?”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
March 17th, 2014 @ 6:31 am
‘Aviation safety expert Sidney Dekker, of the Safety Science Innovation Lab at Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia, noted: “Particularly over oceanic areas, radar coverage is extremely unreliable and partial.”‘
‘He dismissed the idea that flying at 5,000ft would put extensive strain on the airframe, as some have suggested: “The only really relevant effect is a dramatic increase in fuel use – its range would be very much shortened by that,” he said.'” “Radar goes in a straight line. If you are in the shadow of a mountain or even the curve of the Earth – if you are under the radar beam – you can’t be seen.””Military radar systems can also be limited in their coverage and may not always be in use. Malaysia’s briefings have made it clear that its own military did not initially take heed of MH370 when it appeared on radar screens heading westwards after diverting. A senior Indian official also told Reuters this weekend that the Boeing 777 might not have been detected by installations on the Andaman and Nicobar islands because the radars might have been switched off, adding: “We operate on an ‘as required’ basis.” FROM ANOTHER ARTICLE — “”It’s possible that the aircraft had hugged the terrain in some areas, that are mountainous to avoid radar detection.”
“This technique is called terrain masking and is used by military pilots to fly to their targets stealthily, using the topography to mask their approach from prying microwaves.”The officials said this type of flying is considered very dangerous, especially in low-light conditions and spatial disorientation, and airsickness could easily set in.
“While the ongoing search is divided into two massive areas, the data that the investigating team is collating is leading us more towards the north,” sources said. https://www.firstpost.com/world/did-missing-malaysia-aircraft-fly-low-to-avoid-radar-detection-1437713.html – – – FROM A PILOT – – I fly in that part of the world a lot and you are out of radar contact quite frequently. To be able to totally shut off the transponder and ACARS units (one sends signals to ATC and the other to the company) requires an in depth knowledge of the systems and how to disable them. I am not sure if Malaysian uses a system called CPDLC (Controller Pilot Data Link Communications) but if they do and they were in fact logged on then they know exactly where the airplane is at all times. In this day and age it is hard to not be “seen” unless your in some areas of Russia, the Indian Ocean etc. but then you might be told “Radar Contact Lost” but get off course and the fighters will find you very quickly. I deviated around an area of thunderstorms going from Hawaii to Sydney once and didn’t tell them we were deviating via the CPDLC and about ten miles off the track we received a message that basically asked “Where in the world are you going?” OOPS! Don’t update a flight plan change from Australian ATC and they will tell you quickly to update your boxes. Can’t run and can’t hide. That is what makes this one so strange. https://gl1800riders.com/forums/showthread.php?449410-Missing-777
March 17th, 2014 @ 8:07 am
I agree. I think they flew under the radar. But, and maybe you could tell me, I think these guys were smart and knew about the signal from the engines. So, I think they landed the plane and just left the motors running until it ran out of fuel. That way we are left thinking they could have flown another 2000 miles and the search area ends up being much larger. They would have landed 5 minutes later and left the engines run for 6 hours.
March 17th, 2014 @ 8:13 am
Interesting speculation, the validity of which depends on the ability to reprogram a transponder in flight.
New information recorded by a satellite over the Indian Ocean determined the plane’s last communication came from two possible widely divergent paths: a northern corridor starting in central Laos and ending in Kazakhstan or a southern corridor starting offshore eastern Indonesia and arcing south toward Antarctica.
Which one would you think more likely?
March 17th, 2014 @ 8:33 am
hands down, Kazakhstan
March 17th, 2014 @ 8:35 am
no, I believe they could record the altitude, but not direction
March 17th, 2014 @ 8:39 am
I’ll bet at least half the passengers have cell phones. When cell phones are turned on, they constantly ping the closest relay tower, unless they’re under water. They can trace individual cell phones to an exact location, but can’t find an airliner?
March 17th, 2014 @ 10:06 am
Dr. Taitz, we can speculate all day on the method used to deviate from the flight plan and escape radar detection, etc. What do you think the motive was?
March 17th, 2014 @ 10:30 am
I can’t make heads-nor-tails of your hypotheses but you’ve always been right about everything else including THE USURPER IN OUR WHITE HOUSE.
March 17th, 2014 @ 11:18 am
My guess that the plain disappears is hiding (cover up) for deploy US milatary into South East Asia in preparation for for war with russia and china over ukrain.
I hope i am wrong.
Bless you Orly for all your work!!
You are a maverik. It is a very difficult job to be a maverik
I am a maverik by my nature, and i am hated by my american family and russian
PS All, pleas, be careaful about Brother Natail site ‘The real jewish news”. My suspiose that he has worked for kgb and corrupted chirch lider farther kirill. just be carefful!!
March 17th, 2014 @ 11:35 am
Excellent Analysis, logical deductions.
March 17th, 2014 @ 11:54 am
I think your analysis is pretty accurate Orly.
I used to work for an airlines and I don’t think it would be that difficult to pay off a fuel employee to falsify their fueling records. I don’t know what capacity of jet fuel the 777 has but you wouldn’t have to involve more than 2 or 3 people to make that happen. 2 pilots and a fuel employee. Just thinking out loud.
March 18th, 2014 @ 3:31 pm
Orly: could poster #7 be right?
If so, then, he has connections to the CIA??
Or is that post of his just fantasy?
How would he know??