Is anyone appealing Oregon ranchers case? Their sentence can be overturned or at least reduced on appeal. Can someone get in touch with them?
Posted on | January 3, 2016 | 9 Comments
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
9 Responses to “Is anyone appealing Oregon ranchers case? Their sentence can be overturned or at least reduced on appeal. Can someone get in touch with them?”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

January 3rd, 2016 @ 8:38 pm
https://abcnews.go.com/US/militia-family-cliven-bundy-federal-land-national-wildlife/story?id=36064909
The Hammond brothers left eastern Oregon early Sunday to report to Terminal Island in San Pedro, California, to serve their prison sentences.
FCI Terminal Island
1299 SEASIDE AVENUE
SAN PEDRO, CA 90731
Email: TRM/ExecAssistant@bop.gov
Phone: 310-831-8961
https://www.bop.gov/locations/institutions/trm/
January 3rd, 2016 @ 9:40 pm
https://www.intellihub.com/breaking-fbi-en-route-oregon-federal-building-occupation/
January 4th, 2016 @ 5:00 am
This kinda sounds like “Double Jeopardy”…
They were Sentenced Once, The States Attorney must have agreed to the Original Sentence.
January 4th, 2016 @ 6:53 am
it appears that the government attorneys appealed the sentence alleging that it was too short per federal statute
January 4th, 2016 @ 2:51 pm
National Liberty Alliance has taken the case I believe
January 4th, 2016 @ 7:39 pm
ihv… mccloud i totally agree…. and you can bet your home obastard had something to do with it
will
January 5th, 2016 @ 9:37 am
Orly…the first judge (now retired) believed that it was a very weak case because almost ALL the ranchers and BLM set fires to do the same as what the fire in question was set to do .That is the reason for such a light sentence( 1 year and 1 day…3 months for the older)…BUT the AG of Oregon (appointed by Obama, now retired for stalking a fellow assistant) waited till the LAST day (before the statute of limitations ran out)to file for the increase of prison time.
January 5th, 2016 @ 11:38 am
that is true, a charge of terrorism was an overreach and the judge should have dismissed it. They could sue for damages due to accidental fire, but there were no damages really, as Hammonds owed grazing rights for that grass that burned, additionally, grass in the wilderness grows anew next spring, what was the damage?
January 5th, 2016 @ 3:09 pm
Orly….maybe you can understand this was sent on the 31 day of December 2015….
https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/sites/default/files/15_12_31_hammond_hc_file.pdf