OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

In 2014 Switzerland had a referendum, where it limited immigration, however it did not effect its’ relation with EU, it still sells it’s products all over EU. We will close our borders and will still sell our products all over the world

Posted on | July 2, 2016 | No Comments

Swiss immigration referendum, February 2014

The federal popular initiative “against mass immigration” (German: Eidgenössische Volksinitiative “Gegen Masseneinwanderung”, French: Initiative populaire « Contre l’immigration de masse », Italian: Iniziativa popolare “Contro l’immigrazione di massa”) is a Swiss federal popular initiative. It aims to limit immigration through quotas,[3] as it had been before the bilateral treaties between Switzerland and the European Union.

The proposal was launched by the national conservative Swiss People’s Party and was accepted by a majority of the electorate (50.3%, a difference of 19,526 votes) and a majority of the cantons (14.5 out of 23; 12 of 20 full cantons plus five of six half cantons) on 9 February 2014. This initiative was mostly backed by rural (57.6% approvals), suburban (51.2% approvals), and isolated cities (51.3% approvals) of Switzerland as well as by a strong majority (69.2% approvals) in the Italian-speaking canton ofTicino, while metropolitan centers (58.5% rejection) and the French-speaking part (58.5% rejection) of Switzerland rejected it.[1]

European Union reactions[edit]

The European Commission issued a statement saying that it was “disappointed” in the Swiss referendum on immigration restriction result but would wait to study how exactly the outcome of the referendum affects the relations between Switzerland and the European Union.[21] European Commission vice-president Viviane Reding stated that the result of the referendum could jeopardise Switzerland’s access to the European single market, saying “The single market is not Swiss cheese.”[22]

Consequences[edit]

Ambox current red.svg
 This section is outdated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (June 2016)

Within the first week after the vote, the consequences were unclear. There were warnings in the hours after the initiative passed that multiple new treaties still under discussion and new and existing collaborations between Switzerland and the European Union might be endangered:[23]

Discussions are ongoing as to how policy and practices can be designed in accordance with both Swiss and EU law. Representations have been made that the free movement of persons is not sacrosanct. Liechtenstein, over 30% of whose residents and over 50% of whose employed are foreigners, has a legal provision that it can restrict immigration. When the EU started the negotiations with Turkey, it explicitly did not include the free movement of people.[24]

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

Leave a Reply