3 Responses to “I was asked if I want support and endorsement of members of the Constitution party. My answer: You bet! I am honored to have support and endorsement of every person and organization which supports the US Constitution, everyone, who is not bribed by the ruling “New World Order” Mafia to destroy this country”

1. tina
   February 14th, 2014 @ 11:52 am

   we would be honored to have you as our Attorney General Orly. Your comment about the “NWO Mafia” destroying our Country. Fox news proves more and more with each passing day where they stand. They are running a special on “GHW Bush” aka “Scherff” NWO King and one of thee most corrupt evil beings alive this weekend. Do we hear them standing for the “Constitution” like you do on a daily basis? No. They also announce this morning early,”Neil Kashkari” running for gov of Ca. He belongs to the GHW-obama NWO gang. Corrupt to the core.

2. Man O' War
   February 14th, 2014 @ 3:04 pm

   Here’s a site that will show who switched their vote.

   reagan report dot com

3. Mary I39
   February 14th, 2014 @ 3:40 pm

   Just picked this up from Facebook. I like this Judge and I think you will also.
   The Blaze writes:

   A federal judge Tuesday ordered the disclosure of a government-wide foreign aid directive President Barack Obama signed in 2010 but wanted to keep hidden from the public, Politico reports. The judge called the scope of the government’s argument for “presidential communications privilege” rather “troubling.”

   The Department of Justice has argued that the Presidential Policy Directive on Global Development was covered by executive privilege, even though the information is “non-classified” and sends directives to agencies not to the president of the United States.

   Judge Huvelle didn’t stop there. She went on to absolutely slam the government’s apparent belief that they are above the law and do not have to answer to anyone:

   The government appears to adopt the cavalier attitude that the President should be permitted to convey orders throughout the Executive Branch without public oversight […] — to engage in what is in effect governance by “secret law.” Such a position conflicts with the very purpose of FOIA, for it is “[w]ithout question” that FOIA is “broadly conceived … to permit access to official information long shielded unnecessarily from public view and attempts to create a judicially enforceable public right to secure such information from possibly unwilling official hands.”

   She concludes, “the Court rejects the government’s unwarranted expansion of the presidential communications privilege at the expense of the public’s interest in disclosure.”

   The Blaze notes that it is “unclear why the administration has fought to keep the document hidden from the public.” I suppose we will find out soon thanks to Judge Huvelle’s heroic stand against a secretive government, the Obama Administration is now required to reveal the documents by law.

Leave a Reply