I believe there is a precedent of Judge Harlan voting in a case before his death and decision published after his death. I need your help in finding those decisions
Posted on | February 17, 2016 | 5 Comments
This is very important. Supreme Court might have already voted on several cases pending before the court and decisions are being drafted. I believe there is a precedent of Judge Harlan voting in a case before his death and decision published after his death. ( I believe it related to the second Justice Harlan, not his grandfather who had the same name and also served on the Supreme Court).
Several months after Harlan died the decisions with his name were made public and it was announced by the Supreme Court that he voted before his death. We need to find those decisions and seek the US Congress to conduct a hearing and have the Justices of the Supreme Court reveal in which cases pending before the court Justice Scalia already voted.
This is extremely important!
Comments
5 Responses to “I believe there is a precedent of Judge Harlan voting in a case before his death and decision published after his death. I need your help in finding those decisions”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

February 17th, 2016 @ 5:15 pm
Nice try but Justice Garlan retired in September 1971 and died in December of that year. He didn’t die in office. That was reported extent last week. Only Scalia and Renchburg died in office in the last 60+ years.
February 18th, 2016 @ 12:26 am
Obama will attempt to erase all decisions Scalia already made that have not yet been published
February 18th, 2016 @ 12:39 am
I did not say that he died in office, I said that his prior vote in some cases was announced after his death
February 18th, 2016 @ 5:09 am
You are also wrong about that. He had granted bail, while still on the bench, to a defendant pending the decision.
In Santobello v. New York (argued and decided in 1971 after Harlan’s retirement), Harlan (II) had granted petitioner’s motion for bail pending disposition. But there’s no indication that Harlan granted the motion after retiring, and a single judge granting such a motion while still on the bench is not unusual.
Harlan (II)’s final opinion was a dissent in the “Pentagon Papers” case, which was filed while Harlan was still on the bench
February 18th, 2016 @ 8:59 am
I still say abolish the SCOTUS. It has been proven to be the death of our basic freedoms not the protector of it. People have voted for special rights to the demise of losing all their rights.