I am very angry…
Posted on | October 30, 2009 | 54 Comments
|
Submitted on 2009/10/30 at 8:15pm
Then you mean to tell me that Judge Carter does not care that he is eligible. We have had presidents ousted before and lived through it. It is going to be much harder to live through the kings reign than to elect another president. I think that if a judge is not going to uphold the law of the land and the constitution he should be impeached. I would think more kindly of him if he would just resign. I am very angry over this dismissal. We have a right to know the truth. ju.bailey@comcast.net Judith Bailey
Answer
I think that being defrauded by a judge is the most hurtful part of it . I could’ve appealed his refusal to grant me default judgement, this case could’ve been in the 9th circuit court of Appeals on July 13. We wasted three and a half months, Obama has caused so much damage to the Nation during that time. I relied on Carter’s promise to hear the case on the merits. Please see the transcript. I stated that I am not obligated to serve US attorney, as I sued Obama as an individual for fraud that he committed as an individual. I said that I am concerned that if I serve US attorney, they will play games and will try to have the case dismissed on a technicality, on jurisdiction. In Court Carter assured me that it will not happen, that there is jurisdiction here and the case will be heard on the merits. He ended up shamelessly lying to me, to 50 people present in court, to all the military plaintiffs, to the whole country, as he ended up dismissing it 3 and a half months later specifically on the lack of jurisdiction and attacked me. You really expect some integrity from a judge, particularly a district court judge. I have no words to describe my anger, my disgust, my outrage. What is the point of going to court? Keep in mind, appeals can last years. Circuit court of appeals has no requirement to provide a resolution within any specific period of time. If this regime wants to kill the case, they can simply sit on it indefinitely in the court of appeals, Obama can finish 2 terms before they move and do anything. So, what do you do, when your government, your congress and your judiciary defraud you and, to add insult to injury, they assassinate your good character and threaten you as Land did? What do you do when the country does not have free press, when the country does not have a system of Justice? What do you do? Where do you go from there?
|
Can someone get in touch with this reporter from Wall Street Journal? |
Comments
54 Responses to “I am very angry…”
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
October 30th, 2009 @ 8:54 pm
Where do you go from there when the
courts are corrupt?
The people who have signed petitions
and raised their voices, who have
emailed you their anger and desire
to get this person out of office,
they are the ones now who have the
say and who will commit themselves
to impeaching this sitting duck.
“We the People” still have the rights
granted to us by the founding fathers,
and so far, and it must be done
quickly, Obama has not gotten the
idea of negating the laws of the land
.. just buying out judges and media.
However, Obama is not going to sit
with his hands folded quietly while
the people begin their protests ..
and over 400,000 ‘pink slips’ were
sent to Congress, via World Net Daily,
so he has an inkling that something
is afoot and it doesn’t bode well for
him.
Therefore, he will muster his forces
and he will do what he can to prevent
the people of this nation the ability
legally to oust him.
The word REVOLUTION is strong but it
worked with France and it would work
here. The White House would not
be able to withstand the marches
and the letters to the senators
and representatatives. They
don’t have the backbone.
Someone wrote about ‘cleaning house’
and that is exactly what must be
done… not only Obama but all his
czars and his minions and the
list of representatives that I saw
listed on another web site. It was
a LONG list of both Republicans
and of Democrats, that should never
ever be re-elected.
I could post it if I can find it again.
People need to know their enemies.
As far as Court of Appeals and months
and months down the line.. that is like
having a doctor’s app’t for 8 months
from now when you have terminal cancer
and need a morphine injection.
It will hurt a lot.
October 30th, 2009 @ 9:06 pm
I think the Judaical system is clouding to obstruct justice. They have used what ever reason to not hear this case on the merits. They are cowards and fools. I share your disgust.
October 30th, 2009 @ 9:07 pm
Since the courts are not interested in pursuing a case against Obama, why not lay the merits of the case out on video, (including the evidence), and blast it across the blogisphere? The more people who see the evidence, the better chance that there will be a public demand for resolution.
October 30th, 2009 @ 9:13 pm
I read somewhere that the sheriffs in the US are not answerable to the Federal government. Aren’t there some sheriffs who are members of The Oath Keepers and who could use some kind of legal action against Nancy Pelosi, Dick Cheney and others responsible for failing to follow procedure properly when the electoral votes were counted? Or maybe even present Obama himself with some kind of legal document because of his failure to present proof of his eligibility. There must be some type of action that is mentioned in those great big fat law books that would cover this situation on a civilian. If I committed fraud, wouldn’t the sheriff come after me? Obama is no different. After all, the man is not a member of the royal family, nor is he God. He is not above the freaking law! This is absurd!
October 30th, 2009 @ 9:41 pm
I think that some got to the Judge Carter thru threats, bribes or blackmail. The people behind the people that put Obama in office simply don’t want the truth to get out. They are very serious about protecting their investment and will do anything to that end.
October 30th, 2009 @ 9:42 pm
Thank you, Orly, for explaining David Carter’s treachery. He set you up and then issued an unconvincing, deplorable, lying dismissal. Many, many people share your anger, and I assume you will appeal. Keep on keeping on.
Despite Carter’s copout, the judiciary does have responsibility for interpreting the Constitution–that’s what the courts are for, for pete’s sake, and lower courts must permit discovery regarding Obuma’s eligibility so that when the case reaches the Supreme Court, which it should and must, there will be facts and reasoning to adjudicate.
All of Judge Carter’s prissy dancing around questions of “standing” and jurisdiction is infantile nonsense. The question is whether we have a legitimate government or not, and it is a matter of the gravest import that deserves to be given a fair trial of truth before the bar of justice ASAP.
While we citizen-patriots impatiently await justice, may I suggest that we stage a recurring, ongoing peaceful march around the White House, with Obuma in it; let’s build a tent-and-camper city in D.C. and occupy it 24-7 year-round; let’s film a quality mock trial and spread DVDs of the trial around the world; let’s petition the Joint Chiefs of Staff to fulfill their duty to challenge unconstitutional authority (cite Nuremberg Trials); let’s give Orly a chance to pursue her Quo Warranto in D.C.; let’s have sit-ins in the Capitol and Supreme Court, etc.
There is still much to do before darkness falls, though the hour is late and shadows of the evening steal across the sky.
October 30th, 2009 @ 9:59 pm
You know orly I called this–ask Joan Swirsky the journalist.
You are dealing with an obstinate breed of judicial duck here Orly, and yes an appeal is a waste of time.
You might read my comment to a recent long posting.
I think the route now is to insist and persue invocation of the Independent Counsel Act. Insist- DEMAND an Independent Prosecutor be appointed to investigate among other things felonious perjury and obstruction of justice. US Presidents are NOT immune to civil suit despite all this legal balony and obfuscation about standing and jurisdiction. Clinton was the first american president to be Criminally indicted by a federal grand jury and his crimes were far less than this pretender/usurper swine in office right now.
We need someone with broad investigative powers similar to ken starr ( the man who lost his gonads along the way and deferred to the farce of impeachment rather than arrest. They just simply lose their nerve orly as did carter–whoe nose, like Land– you once again tweaked–i don’t know what is wrong with you sometimes. You are so brilliant and steady and forceful and yet make major errors. Pathian shot at Land, and prepublicity pressure on carter–I knew he would notlike it. these are side issues but it seems these Judges can’t wait to boot you in the behind when all is said and done and orders are in.
read all of oct 5 2009. He tips his hand early with his “way out”–focusing on standing and such. Thought kreep did well–he used the word SCHMUCK–I smiled. They are schmucks Orly.
I think you should back off the legal gambit for a spell and re charge those russian batteries and then come back swinging by strring the pot again insisting on invoking th4e Independent Counsel ACT, because there is probable cause here for action on his or her part. problem is that other schmuck the rascist piss ant Holder. Can he be pressured to to appoint and independent prosecutor who could then after an thorough investigation goi before a federal criminal grand jury–just like clinton situation– to have them hand down an indictment–thats the road to take orly.
because soon Obama’s henchman suck asses will begin the attack against you and others and your law licenses. the son of a bitches have a steel huinged door called standing and jurisdiction and the judges won’t open it to discovery– they are afraid–it is no longer a matter of law, it is a matter of conformity and fear at the highest levels.
You are dealing with arcane expressions like Sovereign Immunity–its a good ole boy club. The leadership of this country is rotten right now in my opinion if a special proscutor cannot be put in place to give this a fair hearing and examination with an eye to criminal indictment then the country has to march on washington and throw this bum out no matter what the cost or method–this cannot go on too much longer and every sensible person knows that. There is a terrible rumbling from coast to coast and a massive reaction will occur in response to the first ruby ridge type situation– that will be the fuse lit on a great big societal bomb of uncontrollable discontent with the way things are going and when people get like this tear gas means nothing—you are talking civil war– many are speaking these words and the Obama administration is deathly afriad of those words– he has a special divison trained for riot control. Ifhe dares bring in foreign troops as in UN troops they will be shot on sight– there are limits and the deadlyplague of discontent is growing and spreading steadily– if diverse elements happen to coalesce then you will have a unified rebellion preceding a bloody civil war. This is what i see and from time to time I see and sense things as if devastation to be is a blow back from the future in terms of cumulative effect independent of sequential space time.
The effects of Obamaitis–and it did not start with him but will finish with him and finish him- are pervasive at all levels of american society. The evil complacent corruption is three dimensional top to bottom, left to right, front to back– they entire barrel of government is rotting out to in and in to out. The rotten barrel is falling apart and rotten apples are leaking out- the stench of corruption is a hell of fetid odors. Decent governmnet is being seduced by pimps and whores in a society telling us perversion is the norm and that GOD, family, love pof country and honoring our military is folly.
It isn’t just Jesus Christ/Julius Caesar OBAMA that is among the primary rot, it is our society at war with traditional and cherished values–that too has to be changed. This civil war will not have a lee forgiven by lincoln rather than hung with his renegade generals,. This civil war will be a reckoning.
This president is opening the doors to the icy chill of the winds of war. And as the bible says: He that troubleth his own house will inherit the wind.
If you want peace then parabellum. If you want traditional values restored and preserved, parabellum.
We have the Bible, the Constitution, the guide to righteous rebellion: the declaration of independence,”, the bill of rights and we know that noble words must be secured by the second amendment. Without a side arm, how does a policeman enforce the law, woith importuning and palliative words? Won’t work, never has worked–not with predators like the chicago Obama crowd.
Cry the beloved country for surely now she is crying for you to help save her–SOON from these predator bastards bleeding her to death.
Grito de Delores
MP
Grito de Delores
too tired to check for typos, maybe tomorrow
October 30th, 2009 @ 10:05 pm
QUO WARRANTO
————
Orly,
First I feel sick about the dismissal — and I cannot imagine how you feel all your work!
How about filing Quo Warranto in DC District Court? You have already taken the preliminary step of requesting and being refused by the DOJ, and the DOJ has a crystal clear conflict of interest.
You have the PERFECT plaintiffs as “interested parties” and lots of support. I would gratefully contribute more money (I have been able to send $400 so far).
I think you should read these questions and comments about your case and Quo Warranto on Leo Donofrio’s blog:
——————————————–
“Sheikh yer Bu’Tay Says:
October 29, 2009 at 9:20 PM
“Leo, I am glad you are satisfied with Judge Carter’s ruling (that I have not read yet). As for myself, I am frustrated as hell. Quo Warranto has already been filed by Orly Taitz TWICE
“[ed. It’s never been filed. You are mistaken. She sent a letter to AG Holder requesting that he file Quo Warranto. He did not. She then failed to avail herself and her clients of 3503 which allows her to petition the DC Distirct Court for leave to file for the quo warranto without DOJ permission. No such quo warranto has been filed. Hasn’t been done.]”
——————————————–
Denny Says:
October 30, 2009 at 12:36 AM
A Quo Warranto was submitted by Dr. Taitz in D.C. Hard to make it work when the person you submit it to suddenly retires or just plain refuses to let it be heard. Who is she to complain to?
[ed. you appear to be too emotionally involved to see the plain legal truth. So calm down and hear me out – the federal quo warranto statute in section 3502 requires that any “third person” go to the DOJ to request the AG bring a quo warranto. Orly did that and no such quo warranto was brought. Hence, her request was refused.
She was then entitled to proceed to section 3503 of the quo warranto statute and approach the court by verified (sworn under oath) petition requesting leave to issue a writ of quo warranto to the President on behalf of her clients. Such a complaint however cannot be based upon unproved allegations, but rather each fact complained of must be sworn to under oath. Under 3503, an “interested person” does not need the permission of the DOJ and such a person can go straight to the DC District Court.
3503 WAS NOT USED. IT WAS IGNORED.
There’s no reason why it can’t be used right now. Got it?
——————————————–
da verg Says:
October 30, 2009 at 8:56 AM
so why doesn’t Orly appeal her case directly to the DC court?
[ed. an “appeal” is not proper. she may institute a proceeding under 3503 but that would entail a verified petition with facts sworn under oath and penalty of perjury.]
and as well ask for a special prosecutor be assigned due to conflict of intetest in DOJ
Carter does correctly mention that Congress has lacked to due their duty in NBC definition, but Carter should mention that the COURTS have made significant case rulings in others with commentary. So he falls —
[ed. snip. He has no obligation to point out what other courts say. Those courts do not bind him in any way. Drop the emotional nonsense. Try to stay on point.]
——————————————–
“JUDGE CARTER DID NOT HOLD THAT QUO WARRANTO WAS IMPROPER TO CHALLENGE THE ELIGIBILITY OF A SITTING PRESIDENT.
“This was the most extraordinary part of today’s ruling. It opens the door wide for a proper eligibility challenge in the DC District Court where the hurdle for standing is different from ordinary federal cases.
“Please take note that the Department of Justice attorneys argued before Judge Carter that quo warranto – even if brought properly in the DC District Court – could not be used to challenge the eligibility of a sitting President. Judge Carter’s ruling did not support the Department of Justice position.
“The ruling today affirms that the proper venue for challenging the eligibility of a sitting President is the DC District Court.
“This is a very encouraging ruling for those contemplating a quo warranto challenge to President Obama’s eligibility in the DC District Court.”
——————————————–
Best Wishes! -Terence Brennan- brennan@mail.triconia.com
October 30th, 2009 @ 10:12 pm
Holder didn’t even respond to my Quo Warranto for 8 months. Do you seriously believe he will appoint a special prosecutor?
October 30th, 2009 @ 10:23 pm
I propose that a RECALL JUDGE CARTER MOVEMENT BEGIN NOW!!!
October 30th, 2009 @ 10:28 pm
First of all I am not licenced in DC and they do not allow regular pro hac vice (out of state counsel), they have a special rule on that.
Second: If Donofrio believes DC is the best place, why doesn’t he file there himself? I’ll work with him. Keep in mind, I have to do 3 appeals: two in GA and one in CA. Donofrio has no cases going. Why doesn’t he help me?
lastly I am concerned about DC. I was told time and again that DC judges are very tight with the government and will not rule against the government. Do you remember that crazy DC judge, who wanted to sanction John Hemenwy for bringing Obama law suit, because Obama’s eligibility was already twittered and massaged on the blogs.
When GITMO judge decided to try this Muslim terrorist Nashiri over Obama’s demands to release him, a DC judge has overturned the decision of this JAG colonel and sided with Obama. Would we ever get any justice in DC court? I have extremely grave concerns about the DC court, as well as most Federal courts.
October 30th, 2009 @ 10:28 pm
we did it time and again
October 30th, 2009 @ 10:33 pm
I have just finished reading dr.katesview
on Word/Press..won’t give the web site
as I understand the links don’t go through..
but she is your ally and has written
a letter to D.C. supporting the Cause.
She also feels that she can access a tape
between Alan Keyes and Obama in a debate
in which Obama states he is not
a natural born citizen but it doesn’t matter
because he isn’t running for president of
the U.S. but rather for Illinois Senator.
She also has a witness to the tape who
will swear he has seen the tape
and the dialogue.
I hope you can go to her site and
read the comments and her letter.
She has an advocate who will send
out copies of dr.kate’s letter
to all sorts of officials.
dr.kate has not finished the letter
and as of Oct.29 was holding off
for more input.
I am in agreement with Martin Pinsky
in just about all of his observations.
If this person, Holder, cannot
be of help, there must be another
route to take.
The last resort will be a march to
end all marches by all of the millions
of people who are not going to stand
idly by and let thugs and crooks
take over America.
Your supporters are in many of the
states, as witnessed by the petition
for impeachment and the one put
out by Glenn Beck, due to a letter-writer
from Arizona.
Over 152,000 (I think)have signed that one
and almost 5,000 on Impeach Obama.
The numbers are not higher because
not enough people know about them.
In other words, you are not alone
on this road less travelled.
October 30th, 2009 @ 10:59 pm
Why not file Freedom of Information Act requests that would inundate the various entities? Obama can’t hide his records forever, can he? Break one of the institutions, such as Occidental College or the State of Hawaii, and it would release the floodgates. Also, has anyone done any work in Kenya or Indonesia? Barry Soetero, or whatever his name was, should be of interest…particularly when he had to relinquish American citizenship, which he didn’t have and needed to be reinstated when he returned to Hawaii, which he wasn’t…Where did he go to school in Hawaii, how did he get into college, etc? We know nothing about this guy…a private detective could figure it out…obviously, the FBI isn’t going to do it, as he not a defense contractor, only the CinC.
October 30th, 2009 @ 11:07 pm
Another thought….with the anticipated deployment of many more troops to Afghanistan, I feel the best avenue if for a mass refusal by the military, under the UCMJ, not to obey the order, as exemplified by several of your clients. Under the UCMJ, they could be court martialed for obeying an illegal order, as you well know..It is not mutiny, desertion or anything like that…this will force the courts to act quicker that trying to determine standing, jurisdiction, or whatever other out they might have. Plus, the DOJ was used as an abuse of power…Obama has lawyers and they should have represented him. The DOJ should be on your side. As should Judge Carter, who caved to the DOJ…surprise, with Eric Holder as AG? They set you up and will continue to do so…we need information which even the Liberal media can’t ignore….
October 30th, 2009 @ 11:12 pm
Have you read this article in the Canada Free Press? Maybe it would be easier to file suit against Nancy Pelosi and the DNC. It’s just a thought.
Print friendly | E-mail a friend | Contact Us
The Mistake, The Evidence, Obama is NOT a constitutional president
The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don’t Lie
By J.B. Williams September 10, 2009 See: The Theory is Now a ConspiracyÑI
See: The Theory is Now a Conspiracy — III
-Please read update at bottom of article
Though we live in an era when all undesirable facts are often blindly labeled “conspiracy theories” by political operatives with an agenda at risk, a very real conspiracy unfolds every now and then.
While it is indeed true that not all theories are actual conspiracies, like when Hillary Clinton developed an imaginary “right-wing conspiracy” out to get her husband, when in fact, the semen stained dress provided all the necessary (but unfriendly) facts and a perfectly logical explanation for all of those nasty rumors Ð it is also true that some conspiracies are much more than just crackpot theory.
To be a bonafide conspiracy, two or more individuals must knowingly conspire, plot or plan an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious act. In politics or law, an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act, is a “conspiracy.” Not in theory, but in reality.
Such is the case today!
A political national committee, the Chair of the Party convention, the Secretary of the Party, Party offices in each of fifty states, and maybe many Ð many more, have knowingly and wantonly defrauded the American election system and more than 300 million American citizens.
They plotted and planned an act of evil, unlawful, treacherous fraud in a blind quest for unbridled political power, and they hoped that you would never catch it. They almost got away with it too…
They snuck it past fifty state election commissions, congress, the US Supreme Court and Justice Department, the Federal Elections Commission and countless members of the Electoral College nationwide. Not a single member of the, as Limbaugh says, “drive-by media” caught it either, or if they did, they decided to become complicit for their own political reasons.
But as is always the case with liars, cheats and thieves, they slip up Ð make a silly mistake Ð overplay their hand Ð leave evidence lying around that they had forgotten about. And as with all chronic liars, they eventually get caught in their own web of lies.
Then, one day, someone stumbles into that evidence, and the house of cards comes crashing down around them. It’s almost poetic…
The Mistake
Aware of the fact that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II Ð Section I constitutional requirements for the office of President, what well-seasoned professional politician would be stupid enough to sign their name and stake their personal career upon certifying Obama as eligible?
Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates are nominated at their respective Party Conventions.
Believe it or not, each Party is assigned the duty of vetting and certifying the legal eligibility of their own candidates. I know, like asking the fox to guard the henhouse, right. But hey, we are talking about a country which still thinks there is a separation of powers between the High Court and the Executive branch, which seats that court by way of political appointment, confirmed by congress, which wants a piece of the judge and expects a few political favors too.
The Evidence
In this case, the Democrat Party was responsible for vetting and certifying Barack Hussein Obama as legally eligible to seek the Oval Office. The U.S. Constitution has only three very specific requirements for the job. The proper legal text used on the DNC Party “Official Certification of Nomination” document reads as follows, and I quote;
“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”
Click to enlarge
Yes, I know…. there is a typo in there. Not my typo, it belongs to whoever prepared the official document at the DNC. Did you catch it?
The document is signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Colorado Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson. It is dated August 28, 2008.
However, this document was never delivered to a single state DNC Office for state certification, and it was therefore, never presented to any state Election Commission as certification of these candidates, although I do have a copy of this notarized document myself.
Instead, a very similar document was delivered to fifty state DNC offices, which those offices certified to each of fifty state Election Commissions, who then date-stamped the document and stuck it in a file cabinet, and proceeded to place these “certified” candidates on the ballot.
The “Official Certification of Nomination” that was presented by the DNC in all fifty states for the 2008 Presidential election, in which Barack Hussein Obama became the new President of the United States, was almost identical, and it too was signed by Chair of the DNC Convention and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, DNC Secretary Alice Travis Germond and Notary of Public Shalifa A. Williamson, dated August 28, 2008.
But this version of the document was missing the following text, and I quote;
“- and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution.”
The legal certification text on the DNC certified nomination document used for the DNC ticket was limited to, and I quote;
“THIS IS TO CERTIFY that at the National Convention of the Democrat Party of the United States of America, held in Denver, Colorado on August 25 though 28, 2008, the following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:
Click to enlarge
Oops, another typo? The reference to Obama’s constitutional eligibility was missing… An accidental omission?
The text certifying that Barack Hussein Obama was “legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution” had been removed from the document sent to the states. And yes, I have a copy of this version of the DNC Official Certification of Nomination letter too!
In fact, this version is in Election Commission files of all fifty state Election Commission offices, state DNC headquarters, complete with date stamps, matching signatures, even the same Notary of Public authentication, and absent the constitutional text.
Just in case you are wondering, the answer is yes. This version also includes the same typo present in the version not submitted by the DNC, but including the constitutional text, which means both documents have the same place of origin.
The individual at DNC headquarters who prepared this very important document was not only a poor typist… they were sloppy enough to leave both versions of the signed documents lying around.
Now this is the stuff real conspiracies are made of!
The Implications
Please, allow me to connect the dots here…
The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different versions of their Official Certification of Nomination documents, not one.
One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of them was missing the text concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama.
The version which is absent any certification of constitutional standing for the office of President is the version that was filed with every state in the country, and the one used by the DNC to elect Barack Obama President.
Oh, there is one more important document in this story.
The RNC “Official Certification of Nomination” for John McCain and Sarah Palin reads, and I quote:
“We do hereby certify that a national convention of Delegates representing the Republican Party of the United States, duly held and convened in the city of Saint Paul, State of Minnesota, on September 4, 2008, the following person, meeting the constitutional requirements for the Office of President of the United States, and the following person, meeting the constitutional requirements for the Office of Vice President of the Unites States, were nominated for such offices to be filled at the ensuing general election, November 4, 2008, viz;”
Click to enlarge
The certification of constitutional eligibility is there in the RNC Certification of Nomination presented to the state Election Commissions. It’s there in the document which the DNC had prepared, signed and notarized, but did NOT deliver to the states.
But it is NOT there in the DNC Certification of Nomination that the DNC used to certify and elect Barack Hussein Obama President and Joseph Biden Vice President of the United States of America.
Last, the fact that TWO DNC Certifications exist, both signed, dated and notarized by the same individuals on the same day, means that a very real conspiracy to commit election fraud was underway, and since it took until six months after the election to uncover it, the conspiracy was indeed successful.
Are you still wondering why Barack Obama has spent nearly $1.5 million in taxpayer’s funds to race Department of Justice lawyers around the country to stop all cases questioning Obama’s eligibility before discovery can force Obama to open up his top secret life?
Now I realize that leftists, I mean liberals, no “progressives” Ð don’t like getting all bogged down in minutia and nit-picky details like the Constitution, but this is actually very serious business here. We are talking about the top-down leadership of the ruling political Party knowingly and wantonly defrauding voters by way of playing monkey business with fraudulent election documents.
As Al Gore once said, the debate is OVER!
There is no honest debate on the matter anymore. Obama is NOT a constitutional president, which is to say, we do NOT have a constitutional federal administration at present and every anti-American policy of the last six months is also, BINGO! Ð Unconstitutional!
What is still in question however Ð does any court in America have the backbone to do what must be done? Ð And what do the American people do, if not one court in the nation has that kind of constitutional backbone today?
Obama’s DOJ has thus far been successful in blocking the people’s access to the courts by claiming that no American citizen, including another presidential candidate, has “proper standing” to demand proof of Obama’s constitutional eligibility for the office he fraudulently holds.
To be very clear, the RNC nomination form filed with the states certifies that John McCain met all constitutional requirements for the Office of President. But the DNC nomination form filed with the states is absent any such language.
I know what I conclude from these facts, but what do you conclude from these facts?
More importantly, what will a court of law conclude? Will they ever even agree to hear the evidence?
The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don’t Lie
Ð Update 09-11-09
First, thank you all for your comments. It is vital to the future of our beloved nation, that every American patriot awaken from apathy and engage in the defense of freedom, liberty and justice. The comments on this story demonstrate that this is happening, none too soon.
I want to respond to several comments regarding this story.
I was first made aware of these two documents when an anonymous reader sent them to me. The documents were posted here Ñ Document #1 and here Ñ Document #2 and I provided these proper links in my September 9, 2009 column Tennessee Grand Jury Joins DOJ in Obstructing Justice.
A poster has taken issue with a couple typos in this column. They make a good point, but more importantly, prove a very important point about this story in that process. Typos are more common than not, and that’s why it is significant that the same typo appears in both versions of the DNC Certification document. Like my column typos, which spellchecker missed in both cases, they are a way of identifying the authenticity and place of origin of a document. I usually take great pains to cross all t’s and dot all i’s just to eliminate any opening to discredit a story strictly on the basis of a typo. In this case, the story is of such magnitude, that it was more important to get the word out than to wait for the normal editing process. My apologies for the typos, but they change nothing.
Upon seeing the two DNC documents posted, I contacted several state election offices and requested copies of the DNC and RNC Certifications filed and in all cases, received the DNC version absent the constitutional eligibility reference. Since the RNC document included the constitutional reference in all cases, and the DNC document did not in all cases, I made the assumption that the same documents were fax-blasted to all states. Some states date-stamp and some don’t. I have NOT viewed all 50 state filings. I recommend that each of you contact your state Election Commission office and obtain a copy of the document filed in your state.
It has been posted here that Hawaii received a version of the DNC Certification that included the constitutional text. I have not verified this claim due to time constraints. However, assuming that the “constitutional” version of the document was filed in Hawaii or other states, this only further raises the question – “why two different documents?” Contrary to the assumption made by the Hawaii Cert poster, whether a state requires Article II Ð Section I text in its certification process or not, the U.S. Constitution requires that all candidates meet those requirements. Further, asserting that only some states require the language in the Certification document explains why the DNC included that text in those certs. But it does NOT explain why the DNC omitted that text from all others. Why two certs?
The good news is Ð the Hawaii Certification proves that BOTH documents are authentic and official, that all matching signatures on BOTH documents are authentic and that the DNC used BOTH when only the one with constitutional text was necessary. It adds complete credibility to the story as both documents appear to have been not only drafted, signed and notarized by the DNC, but filed differently in different locations. Why not just file one version including the constitutional text?
Last, this story confirms that some form of a conspiracy to mislead and ultimately defraud voters took place at the top of the Democrat Party. No story in recent history is of greater gravity. Yet, some prefer to focus their attention upon John McCain, who was not only a well known war hero from a well known US Military family of distinction, but a Senate confirmed Natural Born Citizen who was NOT elected President. Others prefer to focus attention on a typo missed by spellchecker, and still others hope to derail the story by asserting that Hawaii’s doc changes the only question raised by this report Ð Why TWO documents? Why eliminate constitutional text from any of them?
This is a very typical strategy of the left, and its purpose is to deflect attention away from the real crisis at hand, and focus attention upon typos, other candidates not elected, and technicalities that change absolutely nothing about the story or the only question of concern, why two different certificates and why omit the reference to constitutional eligibility regarding a candidate who clearly does not meet those requirements?
I reported what I found in a clear factual manner, and even the comments seeking to discredit, further confirm the basis for the story. So, in the end, I must ask, what do you make of all evidence presented?
If I missed any typos here, I apologize!
October 30th, 2009 @ 11:12 pm
A public citizens grand jury at the National Press Club, film it for You Tube, then travel to each state capital and do the same, or have the grand juries which have been held, stage it at their capitals and film on You Tube. The growing public awareness is their enemy. Corner them. They use the media to manipulate the public. An informed citizenry can make better choices. The next biggest goal is secure the vote. Maybe make a list on your web site of who you approve to vote for in each state, as things come around to that again, hopefully. The Orly Good Patriot Seal of Approval!!
October 30th, 2009 @ 11:36 pm
Regarding the DC courts, you are right in your pessimism. The stakes are so high, and the authorities and press are all frightened or corrupt.
Donofrio says he hasn’t filed Quo Warranto because he does not qualify as an “interested party”. But he encourages a Quo Warranto filing in DC, and sounds like he really believes it would have to proceed. A special prosecutor would be needed.
I have no idea what Donofrio can or would do to help. Perhaps you may want to directly contact him.
All I see is a deathly fear by all authorities to do anything critical of the usurper, much less removing him from the fraudulently obtained office.
Removing Obama couldn’t possible make the country worse off — for he is dismantling it as fast as he can! There would be no disruption of government as he would instantly be replaced by the Vice President, and the nation would go forward – under the Constitution — LEGALLY.
With the “president” a usurper under the Constitution we have the highest officer of the land making a mockery of the highest law of the land.
This is a bad dream. Unless it is resolved it will be a blot on the history of the US, or maybe even the end of the US as we have known it.
Please know that there are so many that admire you so much you for your work and dedication!
——————————————
Terence Brennan brennan@mail.triconia.com
October 30th, 2009 @ 11:56 pm
Orly:
By continuing your fight in the courts you maintain the pressure by keeping this in the news and in front of the public.
Victory in the courts is not to be expected since they are controlled by the criminal cabal.
But We the People need a standard bearer who can take the pressure and who we can trust – I think that lets out the Glenn Becks and other media personality types.
Continue doing what you do so well, and ignore the damning with faint praise – regarding a victory in the courts you are in an impossible position. We the People don’t expect it, and it’s up to We the People to fight this out in the streets while you continue flying the flag and fighting the good fight in the courts. It will be won, but it will be nice to have someone to rally around when times get rough so get some rest, buck up, Trust in God, and get back in the fray.
De Oppresso Liber
October 31st, 2009 @ 12:15 am
Dr. Orly, Whatever you decide to do we are with you. You need to take a rest and regroup. I know how you feel about BO and I can assure you that you are not alone. I wake up at night just thinking about what he has done to this country and to my childrens future. Sometimes you just have to turn it over to the Lord and let him take care of the situation. Not that you should just sit down and do nothing, but trust in him that things will be alright. I get on your website every day so I will keep checking if or when you decide you will appeal. Whatever you decide the American people know that you have done your very best to see justice done.
October 31st, 2009 @ 12:40 am
CARTER DECISION FATAL FLAW: When all is said and done, ONE CLAIM MOST DEFINITELY SURVIVES, and that is Keyes’ claim for fraud committed by Candidate Obama before becoming President, which Judge Carter pretends away on the sole basis of Orly having filed same on 1/20/09 at an hour after Obama took the Oath. That’s a “red herring” because Obama took the valid Oath on 1/21/09, no Presidential immunity exists for tort fraud by Candidate Obama before becoming President, and “before-or-after” Oath filing by Orly is irrelevant for such case which does NOT seek Presdential removal, albeit Judge Carter pretends that IS the sole relief sought by Keyes.
October 31st, 2009 @ 1:42 am
Dear Dr. Taitz,
What you do … once you catch your breath … is realize that all your work so far has brought you to a uniquely strong position. Success is achievable, but only with full clarity about Constitutional separation of powers, and precise focus on the method specified by Congress for resolution of this issue.
Donofrio is right to focus on what the DOJ’s defense and Judge Carter’s decision said about the Quo Warranto statute in D.C. As harsh as it may seem, the rest does not matter at this time.
The essential fact now is Obama’s stipulated foreign allegiance at birth. The essential question is whether foreign allegiance at birth precludes natural born citizenship.
There IS a level of public pressure that WOULD prompt the D.C. District Court to act. But first, the Quo Warranto statute must be fully pursued. Then we need to create that public pressure.
Once this legal question is answered, there will be time to deal with the criminal matters. Until then, everything else is distraction.
I understand your frustration, but I don’t think Donofrio has withheld anything. I know you’ve been extremely busy, but I believe him that he has published all the guidance needed. I think you also have something most of us don’t – the ability to communicate with him privately.
Whatever your choices, I wish you the best and thank you for all your efforts.
October 31st, 2009 @ 2:07 am
THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES, AND THE CORAGEUS FEW WHO DARE TO TELL ARE RIDICULED.
This is not the America I gave my life and the future of my family to.
October 31st, 2009 @ 2:27 am
Against all odds, overwhelming odds, incredible odds, Orly got onto mainstream media despite their determination to ignore her. If you can do that, and continue to wear them down with your captivating style and persistence, you will shame them into proper behavior like a good Mother of Liberty, scolding her rascal commies into respecting the rights of their fellow citizens. You may end up having your own commentary show, Orly. Please, keep on Trucking.
Your relentlessness is having as much or more impact outside the court as in, and showing us what buffoons we have as judges. They are livid when they are exposed to the world and cannot tolerate transparency, blaming you for shining the light on them.
Do not apologize for thousands of citizens contacting them, but tell them that this is freedom at work….freedom of speech, freedom to contact the courts your tax dollars are paying for, freedom to know why the so-called president used other people’s social security numbers, freedom to know why the judge hires clerks who work privately for the president, freedom to call the court and leave messages on the machines our tax dollars have paid for….this is the freedom the judge has sworn to defend. Turn it back on them when they start attacking you for exercising your own freedoms. Since when does a lawyer not have a right to represent citizens across the country. I think we should start calling Judge Carter every day of his tenure until he decides to quit…jam his phone lines all day every day. What a trip. “Tell my taxpayer bosses to stop calling.” A Marine? I do not believe that either. Show us your papers. Marines do not whine.
October 31st, 2009 @ 2:44 am
I fear time is running short for America unless we do something that will cause the traitors in D.C. to stand up and take notice. These games must end. These endless dismissals, spitting on the Constitution by corrupt judges has gone on long enough. We are a nation of tolerance, but citizens are near the end of their ropes. Who is bigger: several hundred members of Congress OR three hundred million U.S. citizens? Any questions, Congress?
October 31st, 2009 @ 3:05 am
Orly, Judge Carter says the court has no jurisdiction to set aside the votes of 68 million people and has no jurisdiction to remove a POTUS. So…can’t you file with only the request that the court review the evidence and declare whether it is authentic? And not request the court to take the next step of removing Obama?
October 31st, 2009 @ 7:14 am
The people behind the scenes pulling the strings, do not play by “our” rules, and we will not win anything unless we start playing by their rules. It’s obvious that the courts, no matter who the judge, will never let this suit happen. We have to be smarter and more inventive in our approach. Anything that is suggested is read on this blog for all to see and thereby giving “them” a headstart on cutting us off. I’m sure there are plenty of military folks out there that could come up with some strategies.
October 31st, 2009 @ 8:41 am
Orly, could you PLEASE POST the mailing address of Judge David Carter’s Courtroom in California – so it can be posted on the internet & his office can then be DELUGED with REAL LETTERS – which unlike e-mail – cannot simply be deleted ?
October 31st, 2009 @ 10:49 am
I believe that this was set up from the get go. Carter lied to Orly on purpose to WASTE 3.5 months.
October 31st, 2009 @ 10:51 am
QUESTION:
So, what do you do, when your government, your congress and your judiciary defraud you and, to add insult to injury, they assassinate your good character and threaten you as Land did? What do you do when the country does not have free press, when the country does not have a system of Justice? What do you do? Where do you go from there?
ANSWER: REVOLUTION!!!!
October 31st, 2009 @ 11:28 am
It is time to go to the Mattresses!
October 31st, 2009 @ 11:32 am
I think it is time to start the sit-ins in these judges courtrooms until the case is heard. These judges don’t seem to care about the constitution and justice. WHAT CONSTITUTION? This will put this case over the tipping point, in front of the American People.
October 31st, 2009 @ 11:55 am
I’m with Roni, why not put it all on video. Include ss# issues, everything. Post on youtube, the conservative monster, wnd everywhere! Something must be done and soon.
October 31st, 2009 @ 12:16 pm
I emailed this to you but since you get so many emails and might not see it, I decided to post it here. I’m glad you’re aware of Leo Donofrio’s statements that he knows a way you can go around Holder and Phillips to file a quo warranto.
Last night, before I read the above comments, I posted this as a comment at his site. It’s “awaiting moderation” so I don’t know if it will get posted but at least Donofrio should see it. Here it is:
You’ve been talking for a long time about the proper way to file a quo warranto and also saying that Orly Taitz has not availed herself of the right method. You’ve been a great armchair quarterback but have you offered to help her? At least one or more of Orly’s plaintiffs must qualify as an “interested person” so contact her and offer to work with her to file the quo warranto the proper way. We sent hundreds, perhaps thousands, of letters plus a petition with over 1100 signatures to Channing Phillips demanding he initiate a quo warranto to no avail. Mario Apuzzo has a separate case recently dismissed and appealed. Why can’t all you eligibility attorneys check your egos at the door, team up and work together??? You all have the same goal which is to remove Obama because he is not eligible. Our country is being destroyed while you attorneys file and fight your separate suits. By the time these various cases get through appeals, it will be too late.
ENOUGH…WE DON’T HAVE TIME…PLEASE TEAM UP, WORK TOGETHER AND DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO SAVE OUR COUNTRY!
October 31st, 2009 @ 12:50 pm
I have just one question here. Why are there not hundreds of attorneys in this huge United States of America working on this case. I find this really amazing. You have thousand of attorneys fighting feverishly every day to prevent a mass murderer from going to prison. However, you can count on number of attorneys on your one hand who are fighting to remove the usurper from the highest office of this great land.
I just simply shake my head in DISBELIEF every time I think about it. WOW!! This is crazy!
It’s going to take some type of concerted effort to get this usurper out of the White House. We need to serious brainstorm as to what effort we need to accomplish this. But whatever effort we come up with, it needs to be a concerted effort.
Ken B.
Fort Mill, SC
October 31st, 2009 @ 1:03 pm
wHY CAN’T OBAMA BE TRIED IN A MILITARY COURT?
HE IS PART OF THE MILITARY RIGHT? ALL FOUR TOP GENERALS HAVE REASON TO SUE OBAMA AS OBAMA IS NOT SUPPORTING THEM AND IS ENDANGERING THEIR LIVES. DON’T THE GENERALS HAVE RECOURSE?
October 31st, 2009 @ 1:45 pm
Orly, Don’t give up too quickly on a special prosecutor. Listen:
Federal criminal law broadly defines who can be held libale for a crime as follows:
(a) Whoever commits an offense against the Unites states, or aids, abets, counsels, commands induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.
(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United states, is punishable as a prinicpal.
The rule on appointment of an independent prosecutor is clear. Justice Department regulations require the Attorney General to appoint an outside special counsel when a three prong test is met
-( Now bear in mid these are regulations holder must abide by)-
First, a ‘criminal investigation of a person or matter (must be) warranted,”28 C.F.R. 600.1.
Second, the “investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United States Attorney’s Office or litigating Division of the department of Justice WOULD PRESENT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR THE DEPARTMENT.” Id. ( a key opening wouldn’t you say given Holder being joined at the hip to the criminal Obama?)
Third, “under the circumstances it would be in the PUBLIC INTEREST to appoint an OUTSIDE Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the matter.” Id.
If the regulation’s three-prong test is met, then the Attorney General MUST ( repeat MUST Orly!!)select a special counsel FROM OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT, id.at 600.3 who would have th4 authority to secure necessary resources ( and there are ample resources) for the investigation and prosecution and have full investigatory and prosecutorial powers, id. at 600.3-600.6
Now remember a tsanding president named clinton–another dumocrat scumbag, was the first president to be criminally indicted.
Trick is to pressure Holder to abide by his own rukles and regulations or have him investuigated and prosecuted.
These courts are killing you Orly– best to put politcial pressure on Holder whether he likes it or not–who cares. he is mandated to abide by the rules and regulations in his own department.In bright clear sunlight of truth he is answerable or should be removed–he was appointed not elected. Congress approved and now they might disapprove with 11/10 elections looming over their heads with a dumbacrat president dropping like a dead bird in the polls.
Obama has to be criminally indicted or you are wasting your time; They control the casino as I have mentioned before. You have to bust into HOLDER’s preserve before they completey ruin this country beyond repair with civil war looming on the horizon. To hell with appeals, and kreep and all anchors tugging at your shapely butbtiring legs. The road is toward a stake in Holder’s black–pardon the pun– heart
Hit them where it hurts in a direct and sustained attack on his office to do the right thing and in fact obey the law. There is a conflcit of interest here that he cannot sustain if you nail him at 600.3
Stop the court business, you have done enough there for God and Country–you cannot embarASS these good ole boys and their yuk yuk esoteric and arcane legal world of unendurable bullshit.
Be Val Helsing, sharpen that stake and head for the attorney general’s heart–go to his dracula den ( today is halloween and we are heading out for dinner), attack him where he is most vulverable–where he works in ostensive comfort and security. Attack him fearlessly and he will ultimately be force to accede or step down. If you study the constitution carefully as to the powers of the presidency you will sense–esp with exec orders, a quasi king through back in founding father verbiage and deeply held colonial views. Most were British and the majority at one time in this constitutional; genesis were actually thinking of making washington a King–but it was great washington himself who declared the presidency. The checks and balances are imperfect vehicles for dealing with political scum like Obama and his chicago gamgster style of running government.
Some say, well lets wait and after all this is the Office of the Presidency that must be respected. If the presdiency as it is now under Obama were a house, the roof would be leaking, the basement flooded and all the Obama BULLSHIT would be backing up from the toilet to soil the rest of the country with righteous anger and wrath–he spits on us daily–what are we to do drop to our knees and open our mouths?
This is the worst son of a bitch to contaminate the sacred and hallowed ground of this country that so many have fought and died for–noble souls, great hearts and good people need not tolerate this swine too much longer. he is just plain no good and for myriad reason to long to deal with here–but we all know what he is, where he is from and where he is attempting to go. he is deluded and oblivious toi the grief he is causing and nov. 2010 will be too late–we will have no country by then–
think of a great majestic blue whale ( the usa) surrounded my myriad killer whales and sharks all taking a vicious bite out of her, bit by bit she she bleeds to death, losing form, unrecognizable as she sinks to the bottom and the predators move on for other prey. This is the USA today being undermined and sold out cheaply–the avergae joe and jill is confused and hoping things will get better–NOT under Obama’s watch rest assured.
I think the Holder attack as outlined above will do the trick–there you can infuse political ptressure not in a courtroom– and if that does not work–heaven help these people because the system will break down completely and in the ensuing chaos they will be the sad victims–similar to the majestic blue described above.
Rest up orly. recharge the batteries–carter is a piss ant in the vital flow of things. You are better than he is and like savage have a burgeoning and devoted following–they all need direction and the pressure should be on holder and laterally convening persistantly around the white house demanding the usurper step down–this done civilaaly at first we are all within the law but in time it may be clear that they are depriving us of law and remedy as in being trapped as you were in the court system.
Am with you in spirit–hope you got the book I sent you.
M. Pinsky—did not reread so typo city again–
October 31st, 2009 @ 1:49 pm
Just read my response -that’s it– spell check nect time
October 31st, 2009 @ 2:06 pm
Per John Charlton, looks like Judge Carter HAS enabled checkmate against Team Obama after all:
thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/carters-not-yet-given-a-final-judgement/
Well done, Orly Taitz case moves forward solely for Plaintiff Keyes for redressable relief of monetary damages, thereby avoiding political question (leave that to Congress once Keyes recovers even nominal damages for pre-Presidential fraud against Candidate Obama) and Team Obama has nothing to appeal to delay the trial.
October 31st, 2009 @ 2:18 pm
His ruling doesn’t make any sense. No one was asking the judge to judicially remove Obama from office. He was asked to allow Obama’s records to be released.
October 31st, 2009 @ 3:18 pm
Dr. Taitz don’t give up yet, Mr. John Charlton, at The Post and E-mail has an avenue to continue the trial as set. Dr. Keyes and plaintiffs still have standing in an amended complaint, as Judge Carter has not filed a final judgement. God bless.
October 31st, 2009 @ 4:36 pm
Bottom line, Judge Carter is letting Congress deal with the political stink of Obama — rather than the Constitutional nightmare of endeavoring to have a Court deal with it.
I now beleive Judge Carter masterfully did this in a way that there’s nothing the Govt. Obama Team can appeal or delay by appeal, since, after all, they did get a Dismissal Granted; it’s just that it’s NOT a dismissal of the claim which is still redressable, that being Keyes for fraud in tort.
October 31st, 2009 @ 4:49 pm
You asked what do you do if you have no recourse in court, in Congress, in the White House, in all the lawmakers, with no free press or worse, a press who lies and propagandizes for Obama? The answer is that you have revolution. First peaceful and if that doesn’t work, I fear, armed. I will hope that the military, who I assume took their oath more seriously than did the former Marine, Judge Carter, will have coup and take power from the usurper with the intention of allowing free elections to candidates who are not about to hurt this country. Hopefully the military will remember that over one and a half million of their fellow comrades in arms, died for this country since the American Revolution and that they need to honor those fine men and women. Sempri Fi.
October 31st, 2009 @ 5:35 pm
Dear Orly,
I have to thank you once again from my heart of hearts for all you’re doing and all you have done for us and this beautiful country. You are so good and right and true and I stand with you always.
Please take a break and try to relax and sleep and spend time with your family. I love you so much and you’re in my prayers now and forever. God Bless You and Your Family and everyone you love.
October 31st, 2009 @ 9:30 pm
Isn’t there an honest, red blooded American judge left anywhere in this country???? One that won’t betray his oath, and follow the law?????
October 31st, 2009 @ 10:48 pm
I am a lay person (not a lawyer).I am not naive. I am watching closely this process for about 1,5 years.I see all this comments and remarks and support – all very nice. Out of all these people, who are writing here and on the blogs, can SOMEBODY answer a very simple question: where are all the people who DO have some voices: all those Republicans, former politicians, journalists, all those so called right wing people and organizations – the silence is deafening. Is EVERYBODY threatened? Is EVERYBODY BOUGHT? Why there were no voices (except 10 known names) BEFORE he became a president? there is internet, youtube – why Jackie Mason is the only one who talks consistently – every week! What is happening here?
October 31st, 2009 @ 10:54 pm
Did you notice in the donor lists to Obama that the highest was University of California, and others were Harvard, Stanford and Columbia. I think these schools have been taken over and subverted. We Americans respect education. The enemies transferred into our schools easily appearing as students and have worked from them to subvert, turning our top universities into terrorist training camps. They need to be investigated and the foreign monies invested in them, used to subvert our government, seized. Arabia has invested a lot in Harvard. Time to stop the foreign money/student flow. And investigate Mercer Island household by household.
November 1st, 2009 @ 2:41 am
Dear Orly,
I have been watching these cases since the first one filed. I am not a lawyer as you will know. I cannot believe what is happening to our country.
Since you have tried every avenue available to get your case heard, why not appeal to the Supreme Court again on the basis of crimes against the Constitution. I am aware that the Supreme Court will not rule on political issues but they are there to defend the Constitution. Also,I would think about an appeal on the basis of asking the Supreme Court to clearify the Constitutions meaning as to Natural Born Citizen. Would they dare to claim that Obama meets the requirement? If the Supreme Court would clearify this, it would stop the claims of Obama’s supporters that he does qualify.It would also put the Senators and Representatives that have been pretending not to be able to see that Obama is not eligible, in a position that they would have to admit that he is not.
November 1st, 2009 @ 3:54 am
Orly,
I think you will like this site. It really takes Judge Carter to task :
jdocarter DOT cjb DOT net
November 1st, 2009 @ 4:23 am
“…and over 400,000 ‘pink slips’ were
sent to Congress, via World Net Daily,…”—————Check your figures. I believe the correct number of pink slips sent to Congress was 4 MILLION.
BTW, if some weirdo flies off the handle and assassinates Obama….thinking that’s the only way we can get rid of him….Judge Carter just may be responsible for causing such hopelessness and frustration.
November 1st, 2009 @ 4:29 am
I was absolutely LIVID when I read of Carter’s decision and unjust remarks.That is all I will say on that for now–still a bit ticked –lol
I am afraid BJP and others are correct,we’re about to walk in the shoes of our ancestors and
make history real-time.
~shiver~
November 1st, 2009 @ 9:50 am
you are welcome to write to Holder. I guarantee you, he’ll do nothing.
November 2nd, 2009 @ 12:10 am
Will,
That is a GREAT site you found:
jdocarter DOT cjb DOT net
( though the middle group I thought was 2 letters at firts, it is actually c j b )
This guy really puts Carter in his place and shows him for what he is. I hope more people read these comments so they can see that site !!!!
November 2nd, 2009 @ 11:51 pm
Hank,
Ditto on that website. I especially like the last line !!!