Here is an original of the picture posted before
Posted on | August 15, 2010 | 2 Comments
The original caption for the photo
InboxX
Reply |Alexander Gofen to me
show details 11:34 PM (9 hours ago)
Dear Orly,
The original caption to that photo was in English:
This baby says she voted for Obama five times, and she gonna’ stand on dat telephone wit(h) her pants off till her man Obama give her stimulus check and start making her mortgage payments like he say he would!
https://www.resonoelusono.com/FotoHumuro.htm
Thus the caption you posted is a result of double translation!.. (Surprisingly, the sense was preserved, yet the original is better).
And I still am very puzzled: how the rights of a person protesting his speeding fine in a court hearing differ from your rights to protest your fine in a court hearing.
Alex
(I asked this question earlier)
I cannot fathom the ugliness of what is happening to this country – and particularly to you. I cannot understand it.
How come that a traffic fine for $500 may be objected, and court hearing in merits for the defender is guaranteed. Moreover, if the witnessing police officers fail to appear, the case is won.
And your fine is $20,000, and your objection has been processed without hearing in merits and without your appearance. And now that Supreme Court hearing – even if it does happen: they may just formally repeat that very kind of sabotaging decision made by the appellate court before them. Again, without hearing in merits and without your appearance to present your case…
Why such a difference in comparison to traffic violations?
Comments
2 Responses to “Here is an original of the picture posted before”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

August 15th, 2010 @ 10:02 am
2007..
https://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=5245
August 15th, 2010 @ 11:36 am
from what I understand, it comes from snopes.com, which is not credible. they have not written a word of truth on obama’s eligibility