14 Responses to “Help me ID the IP 67.23. 166.142”

1. T.W.
   February 25th, 2013 @ 8:09 pm

   I sent a gmail email to you on this ! Pune India, other info included!!!

2. Brett Tiernan
   February 25th, 2013 @ 8:18 pm

   https://www.ipaddress-finder.com/?ip=67.23.166.142

   This is what I found by searching the IP.

3. Indie Pendant
   February 25th, 2013 @ 8:21 pm

   There is a way to search in your computers search bar by typing in the I.P. #’s . Or find an I.P. tracer program.

4. Anonymous
   February 25th, 2013 @ 8:27 pm
5. JEAN MACALLISTER
   February 25th, 2013 @ 8:29 pm

   https://www.ehow.com/how_6358493_identify-ip-address-email.html
   I hope this information is of help to you.

6. Steve Smith
   February 25th, 2013 @ 8:29 pm

   Here is the information you requested to identify an i.p. address:

   https://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/67.23.166.142

   Info is:

   IP: 67.23.166.142
   Decimal: 1125623438
   Hostname: ra11.radioworldonline.com
   ISP: Netriplex LLC
   Organization: Leapswitch Networks Private Limited
   Services: None detected
   Type: Corporate
   Assignment: Static IP
   Blacklist:
   Geolocation Information
   Country: India in flag
   State/Region: Maharashtra
   City: Pune
   Latitude: 18.5333 (18° 31′ 59.88″ N)
   Longitude: 73.8667 (73° 52′ 0.12″ E)

7. charlene zechender
   February 25th, 2013 @ 8:46 pm

   CONGRESS FINDS ERIC HOLDER GUILTY OF CRIMINAL CONTEMPT (255 to 67 Vote) AND CIVIL CONTEMPT (258 to 95 Votes)

8. charlene zechender
   February 25th, 2013 @ 8:46 pm

   VIRGINIA CLOSE TO CHARGING OBAMA WITH CAPITAL MURDER!

9. charlene zechender
   February 25th, 2013 @ 8:49 pm

   THE TRUTH: 9 Attorney Generals Detail 21 Blatant Obama Law Vi… https://cleowaller.blogspot.com/2013/02/9-attorney-generals-detail-21-blatant.html?spref=tw

10. charlene zechender
    February 25th, 2013 @ 8:52 pm

    Obama Illinois bar application fraud, Obama lied about drug use other names and tickets, Andy Martin complaint letter to IL Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission
    Posted on April 9, 2012 | 94 Comments

    Obama Illinois bar application fraud, Obama lied about drug use other names and tickets, Andy Martin complaint letter to IL Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission

    “Why did Barack Obama surrender his IL law license?”…Citizen Wells
    “They can’t punish someone who has resigned, which is why so many corrupt lawyers in Illinois resign before they are disbarred.”…Andy Martin

    “Truth will ultimately prevail where there is pains to bring it to light.”…George Washington

    Citizen Wells articles about fraud committed by Obama on his Illinois Bar Application have been getting a lot of attention lately. I am reprinting what I consider to be the more damning one. Andy Martin, whether you agree with him or not, was in the forefront of questioning Barack Obama prior to 2008. Martin has a legal background and below you will see his complaint against Obama from March 13, 2007 filed with the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission. You will also find an email exchange between me and Andy Martin.

    From Citizen Wells September 29, 2009.

    There is much controversy regarding Barack Obama being eligible to be president. What we know is that Obama has not produced an actual birth certificate, his father was a British citizen, Obama is not a natural born citizen, Obama has kept hidden almost all official documents related to his past. One of the records Obama was not completely able to hide was his IL bar application. Here is data from Obama’s bar application that was saved in 2008.

    BObarApplication

    The Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission
    An agency of the Illinois Supreme Court

    Rules of the Board of Admissions and Committee on Character and Fitness
    RULE 6 CHARACTER AND FITNESS REQUIREMENTS
    “Rule 6.4. The revelation or discovery of any of the following should be treated as cause for further detailed inquiry before the Committee decides whether the law student registrant or applicant possesses the requisite character and fitness to practice law: (a) unlawful conduct; (b) academic misconduct; (c) making false statements, including omissions;

    (d) misconduct in employment; (e) acts involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation; (f) abuse of legal process; (g) neglect of financial responsibilities; (h) neglect of professional obligations; (i) violation of an order of a court; (j) evidence of conduct indicating instability or impaired judgment; (k) denial of admission to the bar in another jurisdiction on character and fitness grounds; (l) disciplinary action by a lawyer disciplinary agency or other professional disciplinary agency of any jurisdiction; (m) acts constituting the unauthorized practice of law; (n) failure to comply with the continuing duty of full disclosure to the Board and the Committee subsequent to the date of registration or application.”

    Barack Obama fraudulently applied to the Illinois Bar.

    Obama had 17 unpaid parking tickets from his days at Harvard.
    Obama omitted his aliases of Barry Soetoro and Barry Obama.
    Obama admitted to drug use when he was younger and there is strong reason to believe he was still using drugs.

    Read the complete IL bar rules:

    https://www.iardc.org/rulesadmissions.html#Rule%203,%20Character

    From the Somerville News, March 7, 2007.

    “Before Barack Obama was a United States senator and a presidential hopeful, he was a Harvard University law student living in Somerville who parked in bus stops and accumulated hundreds of dollars in parking tickets. And for nearly two decades those parking tickets went unpaid, until a representative of Obama’s settled all his outstanding debts with Cambridge’s Traffic, Parking and Transportation Department Jan. 26.

    Obama attended Harvard Law School from 1988 to 1991. During his time at Harvard, Obama lived at 365 Broadway in Somerville, according to his parking tickets. Records from the Cambridge Traffic, Parking and Transportation office show that between Oct. 5, 1988 and Jan. 12, 1990 Obama was cited for 17 traffic violations, sometimes committing two in the same day. The abuses included parking in a resident permit area, parking in a bus stop and failing to pay the meter.

    Twelve of Obama’s 17 tickets were given to him on Massachusetts Avenue.

    In one eight day stretch in 1988, Obama was cited seven times for parking violations and was fined $45. Thirteen of the 17 violations occurred within one month in 1988.

    Obama’s disobedience of the rules of the road earned him $140 in fines from the City of Cambridge. The tickets went unpaid for over 17 years and $260 in late fees were added to the tab. On Jan. 26, the fines and late fees were paid in full. The final tally for Obama’s parking breaches was $400, according to Cambridge Traffic, Parking and Transportation.

    Obama spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki said the presidential candidate’s parking violations were not relevant.”

    Read more:

    https://somervillenews.typepad.com/the_somerville_news/2007/03/obama_finally_p.html#more

    “not relevant”??

    Apparently they were relevent to the IL bar and running for president.

    Andy Martin filed a formal complaint with the Illinois Board of Admissions, Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission and Illinois Supreme Court on March 13, 2007.

    “March 13, 2007

    Illinois Board of Admissions to the Bar
    625 S. College Street
    Springfield, IL 62704
    via fax (217) 522-3728
    with copies to:

    Attorney Registration and
    Disciplinary Commission
    Suite 1100
    130 E. Randolph Street
    Chicago, IL 60601
    via fax (312) 565-1806

    Clerk
    Illinois Supreme Court
    Supreme Court Building
    Springfield, IL 62706

    Re: Barack Hussein Obama (see attached)

    COMPLAINT
    Dear Board, Commission and Clerk’s Office:

    I am addressing the following complaint to all three of your offices because
    I am not sure which of you has jurisdiction to review the matters submitted
    below.

    Please deem this letter a formal complaint and request for investigation
    submitted to all three of your offices, although I understand that only one
    office will likely have authority to proceed with an actual investigation.

    1. Background facts

    a. Bar admission of Barack Hussein Obama
    Mr. Obama was admitted to the Illinois Bar on December 17, 1991 (see
    attached ARDC page). He is currently inactive.

    b. IBAB requirements
    The IBAB requires that bar admission applicants disclose whether they have
    outstanding parking tickets (see attached excerpt from current application).
    Obviously, in so far as the admission of Mr. Obama is concerned, the form of
    the 1991 IBAB application would be controlling.

    c. Outstanding parking tickets of Obama
    Mr. Obama recently paid outstanding parking tickets that were unpaid at the
    time of his admission to the bar (see attached news stories).

    2. Legal issues
    If in 1991 Mr. Obama signed an application to IBAB and denied that he owed
    outstanding parking tickets, he falsified his application and gained
    admission to the bar by fraud.

    3. Request for relief/investigation/action
    I would respectfully submit that Mr. Obama’s 1991 application should be
    scrutinized to determine whether he falsified his answers and whether he
    gained admission to the bar on the basis of fraudulent representations.
    If the investigating authority determines that Mr. Obama’s answers were
    deceptive, I believe an appropriate sanction should be imposed. It obviously
    should not be a major sanction but a public reprimand or other appropriate
    sanction should be imposed to protect the integrity of the admissions
    process.

    Respectfully submitted,
    ANDY MARTIN”

    Here is an email exchange from 2008 between Citizen Wells and Andy Martin.

    From: Citizen Wells
    To: Andy Martin

    Sun, Sep 21, 2008 7:37 PM

    What was the outcome of your March 13, 2007 complaint to the Illinois Supreme Court
    regarding Obama’s application?
    Thanks.
    Wells

    From: Andy Martin
    To: Citizen Wells

    Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:40 PM
    Nothing. Obama had already resigned as a lawyer and so they had no jurisdiction over him.

    From: Citizen Wells
    To: Andy Martin

    Sep 21, 2008 at 7:45 PM
    Thanks for the rapid response.
    However, is there not a penalty for supplying false information?
    Wells

    From: Andy Martin
    To: Citizen Wells

    Sep 21, 2008 at 7:48 PM
    Not if they have lost jurisdiction over the individual. They can’t punish someone who has resigned, which is why so many corrupt lawyers in Illinois resign before they are disbarred.
    https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/09/29/obama-records-il-bar-application-fraud-obama-lies-deception-obama-not-natural-born-citizen-andy-martin-complaint-letter-to-illinois-il-supreme-court-illinois-board-of-admissions/

11. charlene zechender
    February 25th, 2013 @ 8:55 pm

    Virginia Set To Charge Obama With Death Penalty Murder

    A stunning Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) report on current legislative actions being considered and/or proposed by the individual States in America states that Virginia appears to be close to executing a warrant against President Barack Obama for the crime of “capital murder” which carries the death penalty.

    According to this report, the top law enforcement officer in Virginia, Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli [photo 2nd left], believes he has sufficient evidence to charge Obama with murder over the US Presidents killing of former State resident, and US citizen, Anwar al-Aulaqi.
    Under Virginia law, this report continues, “the willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing of more than one person within a three-year period” constitutes the charging of Obama with capital murder, which carries the death sentence, due to the President’s killing of al-Aulaqi’s 16 year old son, Abdulrahman Anwar al-Aulaqi, who, like his father, was also a US citizen.

    Attorney General Cuccinelli, this report says, has long been critical of Obama and during a 2010 appearance, when an audience member asked, “what can we do about Obama and the birth certificate thing”, responded that if Virginia challenged a law, he could seek to invalidate it because “someone qualified to be President didn’t sign it”, and the possibility that Obama was born in Kenya did not “seem beyond the realm of possibility”.

    Virginia appears to one of the most anti-Obama regime States as evidenced by when the White House called drone strikes against Americans on US soil ‘legal,’ ‘ethical’ and ‘wise’ – even without evidence of a pending attack – they responded by starting the process of enacting a law banning the use of police and/or Federal government drones, and their city of Charlottesville becoming the first in the United States to outlaw these pilotless assassins from being in their skies.

    Al-Aulaqi, this report says, served as imam at the Dar al-Hijrah mosque near Falls Church, Virginia, serving Muslims in Northern Virginia. He also led academic discussions frequented by FBI Director of Counter-Intelligence for the Middle East Gordon M. Snow. Al-Aulaqi also served as the Muslim chaplain at George Washington University and in 2002 he became the first imam to conduct a prayer service for the Congressional Muslim Staffer Association at the US Capitol.

    In 2010, however, Obama signed an “assassination order” against al-Aulaqi and on 30 September 2011 he was killed after being targeted by a CIA drone strike in Yemen.

    Two weeks later, on 14 October 2011, al-Aulaqi’s son Abdulrahman was likewise killed in Yemen by Obama’s order leading human rights groups to ask questions as to why this child, an American teenager, was killed by the US in a country with which the United States is not at war. Jameel Jaffer, deputy legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), further stated after this childs assassination, “If the government is going to be firing Predator missiles at American citizens, surely the American public has a right to know who’s being targeted, and why.”

    The Obama regime, however, disagrees with the ACLU and in a memo obtained by NBC News this past week refers to a broader definition of imminence and specifically says their government is not required to have “clear evidence that a specific attack on US persons and interests will take place in the immediate future” in order to assassinate anyone the President chooses without either charges or trial.
    The highly respected US Constitutional lawyer and political journalist Glen Greenwald, writing in London Guardian newspaper, further stated, in his article titled Chilling Legal Memo From Obama DOJ Justifies Assassination Of US Citizens:

    “The most extremist power any political leader can assert is the power to target his own citizens for execution without any charges or due process, far from any battlefield. The Obama administration has not only asserted exactly that power in theory, but has exercised it in practice. In September 2011, it killed US citizen Anwar Awlaki in a drone strike in Yemen, along with US citizen Samir Khan, and then, in circumstances that are still unexplained, two weeks later killed Awlaki’s 16-year-old American son Abdulrahman with a separate drone strike in Yemen.

    Since then, senior Obama officials including Attorney General Eric Holder and John Brennan, Obama’s top terrorism adviser and his current nominee to lead the CIA, have explicitly argued that the president is and should be vested with this power. Meanwhile, a Washington Post article from October reported that the administration is formally institutionalizing this president’s power to decide who dies under the Orwellian title “disposition matrix”.

    So truly Orwellian has the United States become under the Obama regime, it should be further noted, that while at the same time their President claims the right to kill or imprison any American citizen we wants, for any reason he wants, and to keep those reasons secret, the real terrorists being targeted are children, and include:

    A 10-year-old boy who was nearly arrested in his New York school for saying the words “Nerf gun.”
    A 5-year-old boy in Massachusetts suspended from school for building a “Lego gun.”
    A 5-year-old girl in Pennsylvania suspended from school as a “terrorist threat” because she extolled the virtues of a Hello Kitty toy, and said, “I’ll shoot you, you shoot me and we’ll all play together.”
    A 6-year-old Maryland boy suspended from school because he used his fingers like a gun and said “pow” while playing during recess.
    A 10-year-old girl in Philadelphia searched and called a “murderer” by her school because she had in her possession a scrap of paper that looked like a gun.
    A 7-year-old Colorado student suspended from school because he threw an “imaginary grenade” trying to “save the world from evil” while playing during recess.
    A 10-year-old Alexandria boy arrested for bringing a toy gun to school.
    To if these seven children will now become targets for assassination by Obama too it is not in our knowing, other than to mention that in the US Presidents new “disposition matrix” it might be so…and no one will ever be allowed to know why.
    By: whatdoesitmean

12. charlene zechender
    February 25th, 2013 @ 8:57 pm

    Court says Obama appointments violate constitution
    Email this Story

    Jan 25, 7:11 PM (ET)

    By SAM HANANEL

    (AP) Richard Cordray stands left as President Barack Obama announces in the State Dining Room of the…
    Full Image

    Google sponsored links
    Master of Public Admin – Earn Your Public Administration Master’s Online at UNC. Get Info.
    OnlineMPA.UNC.edu

    Home Defense Plan – 10 Deadly Mistakes To Avoid A Brutal Home Invasion
    http://www.LegallyConcealed.org

    WASHINGTON (AP) – President Barack Obama violated the Constitution when he bypassed the Senate last year to appoint three members of the National Labor Relations Board, a federal appeals court ruled Friday in a far-reaching decision that could severely limit a chief executive’s powers to make recess appointments.

    The decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit marked a victory for Republicans and business groups critical of the labor board. If it stands, it could invalidate hundreds of board decisions over the past year, including some that make it easier for unions to organize.

    When Obama filled the vacancies on Jan. 4, 2012, Congress was on an extended holiday break. But GOP lawmakers gaveled in for a few minutes every three days just to prevent Obama from making recess appointments. The White House argued that the pro forma sessions – some lasting less than a minute – were a sham.

    The court rejected that argument, but went even further, finding that under the Constitution, a recess occurs only during the breaks between formal year-long sessions of Congress, not just any informal break when lawmakers leave town. It also held that presidents can bypass the Senate only when administration vacancies occur during a recess.

    White House press secretary Jay Carney said the administration strongly disagrees with the decision and that the labor board would continue to conduct business as usual, despite calls by some Republicans for the board members to resign.

    “The decision is novel and unprecedented,” Carney said. “It contradicts 150 years of practice by Democratic and Republican administrations.”

    Under the court’s decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid.

    The Justice Department hinted that the administration would ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decision, which was rendered by three conservative judges appointed by Republican presidents. “We disagree with the court’s ruling and believe that the president’s recess appointments are constitutionally sound,” the statement said.

    The court acknowledged that the ruling conflicts with what some other federal appeals courts have held about when recess appointments are valid, which only added to the likelihood of an appeal to the high court.

    “I think this is a very important decision about the separation of powers,” said Carl Tobias, a constitutional law professor at Virginia’s University of Richmond. “The court’s reading has limited the president’s ability to counter the obstruction of appointments by a minority in the Senate that has been pretty egregious in the Obama administration.”

    The ruling also threw into question the legitimacy of Obama’s recess appointment of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Cordray’s appointment, made on the same date, has been challenged in a separate case.

    Carney insisted the court’s ruling affects only a single case before the labor board and would have no bearing on Cordray’s appointment. Obama on Thursday renominated Cordray for the job.

    The case challenging the recess appointments was brought by Noel Canning, a Washington state bottling company that claimed an NLRB decision against it was not valid because the board members were not properly appointed. The D.C. Circuit panel agreed.

    Obama made the recess appointments after Senate Republicans blocked his choices for an agency they contended was biased in favor of unions. Obama claims he acted properly because the Senate was away for the holidays on a 20-day recess. The Constitution allows for such appointments without Senate approval when Congress is in recess.

    But during that time, GOP lawmakers argued, the Senate technically had stayed in session because it was gaveled in and out every few days for so-called pro forma sessions.

    GOP lawmakers used the tactic – as Democrats had done in the past – specifically to prevent the president from using his recess power to install members to the labor board and the consumer board. They had also vigorously opposed the nomination of Cordray.

    The three-judge panel flatly rejected arguments from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, which claimed that the president has discretion to decide that the Senate is unavailable to perform its advice and consent function.

    “Allowing the president to define the scope of his own appointment power would eviscerate the Constitution’s separation of powers,” Chief Judge David Sentelle wrote in the 46-page ruling. He was appointed by President Ronald Reagan.

    The court ruled that during one of those pro forma sessions on Jan. 3, 2012, the Senate officially convened its second session of the 112th Congress, as required by the Constitution.

    Sentelle’s opinion was joined by Judge Thomas Griffith, appointed to the court by President George W. Bush, and Karen LeCraft Henderson, who was appointed by President George H.W. Bush.

    “With this ruling, the D.C. Circuit has soundly rejected the Obama administration’s flimsy interpretation of the law, and (it) will go a long way toward restoring the constitutional separation of powers,” said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.

    GOP House Speaker John Boehner welcomed the ruling as “a victory for accountability in government.”

    If the ruling stands, it would invalidate more than 600 board decisions issued over the past year. It also would leave the five-member labor board with just one validly appointed member, effectively shutting it down. The board is allowed to issue decisions only when it has at least three sitting members.

    Obama used the recess appointment to install Deputy Labor Secretary Sharon Block, union lawyer Richard Griffin and NLRB counsel Terence Flynn to fill vacancies on the labor board, giving it a full contingent for the first time in more than a year. Block and Griffin are Democrats, while Flynn is a Republican. Flynn stepped down from the board last year.

    All three vacancies on the labor board had been open for months before Obama acted to fill them.

    Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa called the ruling “a radical departure from precedent” and argued that Obama had no choice but to act.

    “Throughout his presidency, Republicans have employed unprecedented partisan delay tactics and filibusters to prevent confirmation of nominees to lead the NLRB, thus crippling the board’s legal authority to act,” Harkin said.

    If Obama’s recess appointment of Cordray to the newly created consumer board is eventually ruled invalid, it could nullify all the regulations the consumer board has issued, many of which affect the mortgage business.

    —

    Follow Sam Hananel on Twitter: https://twitter.com/SamHananelAP

    Google sponsored links

    Obams’s Gas Price Hike? – Is president Obama to blame for gas prices? Vote here now.
    http://www.newsmax.com/surveys

    Exercise Your Brain – Games You Didn’t Know Existed to Fight Brain Decline and Aging.
    http://www.lumosity.com

    Windows 7 Driver Download – Windows 7 Drivers Latest Download. Microsoft Certified. (Recommended)
    http://www.Windows-7.DriverUpdate.net

13. Billy Rubin
    February 26th, 2013 @ 10:02 am

    @Charlene – I am guessing you didn’t get a chance to look at the origin of your piece about Virginia charging Obama with murder. If you look at the actual article, it quotes a “stunning Ministry of Foreign Affairs report” – and links to the Russian government.

    The US doesn’t have a “Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” Apparently, this article is actually taking something that the Russian government wrote. I am sure you do not want to be spreading Communist propaganda! I think given how Dr. Taitz is trying to stop Communism, we should all do a much better job making sure we aren’t spreading foreign Comunist propaganda in our comments!

14. Samwell Endibud
    February 27th, 2013 @ 4:29 pm

    Hey Rubin – why don’t you go shove a pickle up your nose? You commie!

Leave a Reply