OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

from US senator David Vitter

Posted on | August 2, 2011 | 6 Comments

After careful study since 2 a.m. Monday morning, when I got a copy of the bill, I’ve decided that I had to vote no on the debt ceiling deal announced by President Obama and House Speaker John Boehner. 

Click here to watch my speech on the Senate floor on Monday.

            First, this bill doesn’t much change our spending and debt outlook.  The up-front cuts in the first two years are trivial – less than one percent. We’re still adding $7 TRILLION of new debt under this plan.  We’re NEVER balancing the budget, NEVER even stabilizing our exploding debt-to-GDP ratio.

Second, there are no enforcement teeth in this bill – zero, zip, nada.  So even these modest spending caps will be busted, sooner rather than later, in my opinion.

And third, I believe the spending cut triggers will actually help ensure that the newly-created select committee does not produce real reform.  No deal will be more attractive to the liberals than what’s already in the triggers – deep, deep defense cuts with no real Medicare reform to make that program sustainable.  And once those deep defense cuts kick in, there will be bipartisan pressure to bust even the modest overall spending caps in the bill.

I certainly don’t want a default.  But I don’t want a downgrade to our credit rating either.  This bill certainly threatens that – with real hurt like higher mortgage and car interest rates for every Louisiana family.  We can – we must – do better.

David Vitter Signature

David Vitter
United States Senator

Category: Uncategorized

Comments

6 Responses to “from US senator David Vitter”

  1. Leon Brozyna
    August 2nd, 2011 @ 8:35 pm

    Forget what the media says about markets down because of the bad economy. The only thing that’s changed is that Congress passed this obscene bill that does nothing to bring spending under control.

    Yesterday, all the markets were down – Asia, Europe, and U.S. Already today the Asian markets are down even more than yesterday. The professional money men know … nothing’s changed in the U.S. We are still on a collision course with default. When it hits the only ones who will be surprised will be Obama, Dems, and their media friends … and they will try to blame the people for their failure.

  2. RacerJim
    August 3rd, 2011 @ 5:27 am

    Thank you Senator Vitter for voting no. Those who voted yes now have cross-hairs on them.

  3. k stone
    August 3rd, 2011 @ 8:17 am

    ff senator Vitter is so concerned about our country why has he not demanded an investigation of Obama,s qualificatons?
    After all if he is illegal so are all laws passed while he was in office!
    This article sounds like self serving BS to me!

  4. Thomas
    August 3rd, 2011 @ 5:05 pm

    Dear Senator John Boehner

    I am writing to you as a very concerned taxpayer and I am

    hoping that as the Speaker of the House you will be able to assist me in a political

    problem that I am having a very difficult time understanding.

    According to Article 2 section 1 of the Constitution of the United States it states that

    in order to be the President of the United States one must be a “Natural born Citizen” now it

    is not clear in the constitution what a “Natural born Citizen” is, but in a book titled the Law

    of the Nations that is defined and it is also said that the Constitution was written with “The

    Law of the Nations “used as a Legal reference and that the definition is “A child born on

    U.S. Soil to Parents not owing foreign allegiance to any other Country “with that in mind

    it seems that Mr. Obama would not meet those criteria, even if this birth certificate that was

    produced is legit, then it would clearly show that Mr. Obama’s Dad was a Non U.S. citizen

    therefore the most that Mr. Barrack Obama could be is a Native born citizen not a “Natural

    born Citizen” and therefore Mr. Barrack Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be the

    President of the United States. Unless I am missing something that seems to be what the

    case is. Could you please explain to me how Mr. Barrack Obama is a “Natural born Citizen?

  5. S Feinstein
    August 4th, 2011 @ 2:46 am

    Mr. Thomas, I would be happy to do that for you. You see, Vattel’s Law of Nations has never been our law. We are a country that interprets the Constitution and follows rules of law. In the Minor case in 1875, the Supreme Court stated, very clearly, that there are only two kinds of citizens, those who are citizens at birth and those who are naturalized. In the same case, the Court equated native born citizens and natural born citizens. The clear meaning of all this is that a NBC is a Native born citizen is citizen at birth. The Court did not define who a citizen at birth was. However, the Congress. Title 8 section 1401, subsection (a) of the US code clearly states that a person born on US soil is a citizen at birth. Ergo, a person born on US soil is a NBC regardless of parentage.

    If you interpretation was correct, the child of a citizen woman whose father is unknown for whatever reason, or whose is not a citizen and either dies or disappears before the child is born could never be a NBC, and that is just plain stupid.

  6. pit zg
    February 4th, 2013 @ 3:44 pm

    Why people stіll use to reaԁ news papers whеn in this tеchnοlogiсal
    globe the wholе thing is available on net?

Leave a Reply