from the founder of the Tea Party Nation Attorney Judson Phillips
Posted on | February 20, 2011 | 8 Comments
Discussions
The Eligibility Issue
The left likes to call it the “birther” issue. The term birther is used as a derisive term by the left, much as truther is. Of course the difference is truthers beliefs are based on a paranoid ideology, where as the birther issue is based on facts.
I prefer to call it the eligibility issue, not the birther issue. Whether you agree or not, the people who are pushing the eligibility issue are on our side. It is certainly counter-productive to deride them like liberals do.
Recently a whole stream of Republicans have come out, at the prompting of the drive by media, to reassure us that Obama is a citizen and oh, yes, he is a Christian too.
Last Sunday, at the prodding of David Gregory on Meet the Press, or as Rush likes to call it, Meet the depressed, Boehner said, the State of Hawaii had said he was born there, that was good enough for him.
Karl Rove, not a friend of the Tea Party, pushed the RINO line that Obama is a citizen and Sarah Palin, at a meeting in Long Island, a few days ago, also denounced the eligibility issue. Palin ended her remarks on the subject by saying, “let’s stick with what really matters.”
This issue does matter.
There are three variations on the eligibility issue. Two are based on undisputed facts. The third is in dispute.
The most commonly reported of the eligibility challenges is the claim that Obama was actually born in Kenya, not Hawaii. I believe, based on the available evidence, that it is more likely than not, Obama was actually born in Hawaii. Obama has spent a lot of time and (other people’s) money, keeping his original birth certificate out of sight.
Why?
Jack Cashill is one of my favorite writers and he has a theory which I think makes sense, that Obama was in fact born in Hawaii, but there is something else on his birth certificate that would destroy the myth of Barack Obama. (See his website, Cashill.com). In the law, there is a presumption that if a party has exclusive access to a piece of evidence and will not release it, the evidence must be adverse to their position.
The second eligibility issue is the claim that because Barack Obama’s father was a Kenyan, a British subject at the time of Obama’s birth, he is not a natural born citizen.
The third is the argument that because Barack Obama was adopted as a child by an Indonesian and moved to Indonesia, he is not an American citizen. Under the law at that time, if an American child was adopted by a citizen of another country and moved to that country, he lost his citizenship. He could regain his citizenship by applying at an American Embassy when he was 18, but would then be treated as a naturalized citizen and thus ineligible to be President.
What is stunning about all of this is the mainstream Republican reaction to the eligibility issues.
The RINOs turn their noses up at the people who want the answers, which, incidentally is 60% of Republican voters. They turn their noses up at the Tea Party movement. Yet, they do not take a moment to consider why this is important.
If Barack Obama is proved to be ineligible to be President, everything he has done is wiped out. Obamacare is gone. The START treaty is gone. The liberal lunatics Obama has appointed to the Federal Judiciary, including the two he has put on the Supreme Court are gone.
Much of the damage Obama has done to this country can be undone. Unfortunately, the Country Club Republicans remain clueless. In their minds, the Democrats are simply the lower class versions of themselves. They do not understand that if the party of treason has its way, America will be forever changed and ultimately destroyed.
The Courts have so far brushed aside all of the eligibility claims. None have been addressed on the merits under the claim that Americans lack standing to challenge the issue. Recently, the Supreme Court has given some indication it may consider one of the issues. We can only hope.
What are the chances of success? Who knows?
Why do football teams run the flea flicker play? It does not work all of the time, but when it does, the results are spectacular. Why should conservatives all hope this works out? Because this wipes out almost everything the Obama regime has done. We get a do over.
You would think, even the RINOs who want to denigrate the eligibility issue could figure this one out.
Comments
8 Responses to “from the founder of the Tea Party Nation Attorney Judson Phillips”
Leave a Reply
EVIDENCE AGAINST OBAMA — YouTube Indiana Trial of Obama !
Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day
OrlyTaitzEsq.comTAITZ REPORT
Official Facebook
IMPORTANT NOTICES – PLEASE READ!
Historic DVD Now Available!
DVD of the historic trial in GA and DVD of a historic testimony in NH, where evidence was provided showing Obama using a forged birth certificate and a stolen social security number. The DVDs are in a beautiful commemorative case with personal autographs from attorney Dr. Orly Taitz $22.50 each +$2.50 for shipping and handling.
---------
To order these DVDs, donate $25.00 by credit card on the website RunOrlyRun.com and email orly.taitz@gmail.com with you name and address. Or send a $25.00 check with your name and address to: Orly Taitz for US Senate 2012, 29839 Santa Margarita ste 100, RSM, CA 92688.
Advertisement / Sponsors
29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy,
Ste 100
Rancho Sta Margarita, CA 92688
orly.taitz @gmail. com
(949) 766-7687
--------------------------------------
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld
--------------------------------------
Bumper Sticker
$9.99 thru PayPal--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------Orly Taitz Photo Collections
February 20th, 2011 @ 1:41 pm
Some Excellent Comments From:
“WAS OBAMA THE BILDERBERGERS’ CHOSEN ONE? –
WHY A MAN WHO IS NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY ELIGIBLE INSTEAD OF HILLARY CLINTON?”
By Shannon Becker
http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/02/19/was-obama-the-bilderbergers-chosen-one/comment-page-1/#comment-46761
“GaryW says:
Sunday, February 20, 2011 at 11:06 AM
Does anyone actually believe that Obama knowingly usurped the office of POTUS for a measly $400K per year, free housing and free golf? You can be sure money is being funneled into offshore accounts by those in charge as he achieves each item on his Marxist checklist. I am sure Obamacare was worth a handsome bonus. Also, have you ever wondered what Obama’s exit plan is if his house of cards comes failing down? A life of luxury in Saudi Arabia perhaps as the guest of the Saudi king???”
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
“michaelsr says:
Sunday, February 20, 2011 at 10:14 AM
I have long suspected an external influence in our Marxist president’s case. Ordinarily conscientious judges and public servants suddenly turn up brain-dead, refuse to perform their duties according to the oath that they took, or, like one of Orly Taitz’ judges promising that her case would be judged based on its merits then reneging at the last moment, a judge who feels it is more important to not embarrass an illegal alien than it is to imprison an Army hero, all the cases that have been thrown out for lack of standing, Supreme Court Justices who refuse to recuse themselves when they have a clear bias.
Many of us had great hopes when Darrell Issa took over chairmanship of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. We thought that he might investigate the loss of our fifth amendment right to have grievances addressed or even maybe investigate the illegal alien in the White House, himself. But no, those of us with such hopes were sadly mistaken. According to this morning’s paper, Mr. Issa intends to investigate the bureaucracy but not Obama.
He originally said that Obama is one of the most corrupt presidents in modern times. Obviously some outside influence made him change that to the administration but not the president. DUH! Now Issa says that he certainly wouldn’t feel bad if Americans were working and he [the illegal alien] got another four years. (Sadly, he means as President, not four years or more where he belongs — in prison.) “My goal is to strengthen the president.” he added.
There has clearly got to be a reasonable explanation for these people who know that obama is ineligible, who have received certified letters with proof, and who have heard from thousands of citizens questioning Obama’s eligibility. Shannon Becker probably hit the nail right on the head. Influence by the Bilderbergers would certainly explain the strange behavior of our public officials and media these past two or three years.
So now. What shall we do about it? Pull an Egypt on Washington, D.C. ?”
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
“Stephen Lumpkin says:
Sunday, February 20, 2011 at 2:45 AM
The Bilderburg Groups money all put together won’t match the Saudi Prince’s money who is the one who put Obama through Harvard & who is still the big money man today.
I hope Americans will move away from the NWO type stuff & start looking at Saudi Arabia. Obama is a Saudi plant & sharia law is the end game.”
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
“Challenger says:
Sunday, February 20, 2011 at 8:53 AM
I agree with the article to a point. I do believe that there are major international forces behind Obama. Unlike Mr. Becker’s analysis, however, I believe these forces were behind Obama long before he decided to run for president. I believe he is essentially the Manchurian Candidate or a Trojan Horse with a much longer choregraphed history behind his accension. I believe there is an unholy alliance going on amongst One World Order types, Communists, Black Nationalists, Islamists, and Middle East financing. I recall the June 2008 events and remember a news report that said Hillary and Obama were huddling in someones home in D.C. on the evening when it was later learned they had slipped out to the Bildenberg conference. Thus, they even tried to keep their attending the conference secret.
At the conference, I believe the big shots told Hillary for the first time that Obama was their man and that she had to bow out and shut up. While some Hllary supporters may have assisted in “leaking” the BC issue, I believe the heavy lifting was already being done by a wide swath of Internet bloggers in general. I know that I was working the issue hard by mid-2008 and posting on many sites at the time that were dealing with the issue.
One site that bothers me to this day is the African Press International site where the editor, a man named Korier, reported that Obama was born in Kenya. A huge web firestorm immediately ensued with the Editor claiming he had gotten a telephone call from Michelle Obama and she read him the riot act over his claim and she said he was a disgrace to the black race. Korier said he had taped the conversation and was going to make the tape public, but, of course, the goon squad got to him and it all went away.
In the telephone conversation, it was reported that Michelle said words to the effect that there was no stinking U.S. law that was going to keep her husband from becoming president. It turns out she was right but she had the benefit of knowing the dirty little secret of the international forces propelling her husband.”
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
February 20th, 2011 @ 5:01 pm
If two citizen parents were not required for ‘Natural Born Citizen’ status then there is no possible logical reason for the adoption clause in Article 2 Section 1. All the founders were charter citizens with non-citizen parents because the country did not exist when their parents gave birth to them. They knew it would take a generation to produce the first ‘Natural Born Citizen’ born on U.S. soil and free from any direct foreign birthright allegiances. The founders needed to include the charter citizens in order to have Presidential candidates until a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ could be available for candidacy. Obama’s birth certificate is relevant only if it confirms that Barack Obama Sr. was his father he claims in his book and on his website. Barack Obama Sr. was not a U.S. citizen at the time of Obama’s birth.
President Chester Arthur faced a challenge by those who believed his father was not a citizen when Chester was born. Before the authorities could seize them Arthur took all his family documents and burned them in his back yard effectively covering up the fact of his ineligibility to hold office. It was only recently in 2009 that a researcher found documentation which confirmed that Arthur’s critics were right about his ineligibility because his father was not a citizen at the time of Chester’s birth.
February 20th, 2011 @ 6:10 pm
Finally another person that see’e ( knows ) what is truly going on !!
February 20th, 2011 @ 10:54 pm
Billions of dollars disappear and the fed doesn’t seems to know where they went. Do you suppose any of it can be found here? https://yourdaddy.net/2011/01/25/wiki-tiki-40-us-politicians-identified-as-slush-funds-are-seized-at-vatican-bank/
Beneficiaries of the covert Vatican accounts include Barack Obama, Michelle Obama and each of the Obama children, Michelle Obama’s mother, all the Bushes and the Clintons, including Chelsea Clinton, Joe Biden, Timothy Geithner, Janet Napolitano, several US Senators, including Mitch McConnell, several US Congressmen including John Boehner, several US Military Chiefs of Staff, the US Provost Marshal, the US Judge Advocate General, the US Supreme Court Chief Justice, John Roberts, several US Judges, the Pope, and several cardinals.
A lot of these names I think are found on the list of Bilderbergs.
February 21st, 2011 @ 12:01 am
Hawaiian Revised Statutes.
[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.
(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]
Yes I know it was enacted in 1982.
Consider that Obama was not issued a Hawaiian BC from day one, granny may have lodged her statement claiming home birth in Hawaii and it got filed, and subsequently a newspaper listing entry was generated.
So it was ‘filed’, but not ‘approved’, waiting some form of verification that quite possibly was not forth-coming.
Later down the track Obama finds a need to have some form of evidence of Hawaiian birth, so he gets issued the COLB still marked as ‘filed’ but still no ‘approved’, this suffices for the time being, hence Fukino’s ambiguous first statement ‘vital records’ and NOT ‘birth certificate’ at THAT TIME.
With the presidential election looming, Obama goes to Hawaii and applies for a birth certificate to be issued under 338-17.8
All he needs to ‘prove’ is that ‘that the legal parents’ ‘had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child’.
So granny signs an affidavit attesting to Obama’s parents’ residency requirements & granny had CONNECTIONS from way back.
Granny as the astute banker, etc that she was, had a high degree of credibility & trustworthiness in Hawaii.
HDoH accepts granny’s affidavit as ‘good enough for me’, so Obama gets his application in the system for issuance of a ‘real’ BC, hence Fukino came out with her follow-up statement where she could safely say ‘birth certificate on file’
So the ‘birth certificate’ may have been issued on the sole affidavit of granny, and Obama may very well have been born ‘out of state’, and to a British subject to boot.
It is also highly possible that Obama refuses to produce this BC for scrutiny, because it will have notations revealing the basis of it’s issue.
February 21st, 2011 @ 6:14 pm
The term “birther” is an intentional misnomer by whoever on the other side invented it. The issue is not WHERE Obama was born. He could have been born in the middle of Washington, D.C. and still would not be a natural born citizen, which is required for constitutional eligibility for the U.S. presidency. To be a natural born citizen, both of your parents must be U.S. citizens. Obama has admitted that his father was not a U.S. citizen. He was a British citizen.
Since this is a no-brainer, all of our elected officials and judges who have turned their heads the other way are complicit in this crime against the American people, who most certainly DO have standing in this issue.
Obama knew he was not eligible. Therefore, the very act of taking the oath of office of the presidency was a violation of the document he swore to protect, uphold and defend.
Incidentally, a few years before Barack Obama ran for president, his staff investigated the possibility of trying to secure an amendment that would change presidential eligibility requirements. Apparently they decided that this would be too much trouble. It would, of course, be easier just to dupe the American people.
All of the other information about Obama’s past may have added to this nightmare situation, but let us not be distracted from the real fact that no matter where he was born, whether or not he ever left this country, he STILL is not and never will be a natural born citizen.
I can’t help wondering whose side those making an issue of Obama’s birthplace are on.
February 22nd, 2011 @ 10:59 am
Hence, the missing 2 trillion dollars went to payoffs to keep mouths shut.
February 22nd, 2011 @ 11:00 am
All the pieces are coming together very nicely.