OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

From reader Todd Saltzer re. UCMJ

Posted on | July 4, 2009 | 2 Comments

Todd Salzer

Dear Orly,

In the FY 2007 Military Authorization Act paragraph (a)(10 ) of Article 2 Sub Chapter 1 (General Provisions) of the UCMJ was amended by Congress. Article 2 deals directly with defining those that are subject to the UCMJ.

The paragraph now reads, “In a time of declared war or a contingency operation, persons serving with or accompanying an armed force in the field.”

United States Code Title 10 defines “contingency operation” and both the Iraq and Afghanistan Theaters qualify.

The law makes no provision excepting ANY person or action. BHO IS a person, just not a very good one.

BHO has visited both theaters and met with with the military commanders in private meetings in both theaters. Any order issued by the CINC, even a confirmation of previous orders, such as redeployment, that affects any Article 138 complainant would subject BHO to the UCMJ under their complaint.

The CJCS would be well aware of this as would Captain Crawford. Even though it is an unintended result of the amendment, it is still a result.

It took over 2 months to respond to you. These men are very well trained and experienced in exploiting weaknesses and not exposing their own. They have the duty to uphold and defend the Constitution and the authority under the UCMJ to act and they do not. There is no indication in Captain Crawford’s reply that the Chairman, who is also the C.O. of the Office of General Counsel, has issued any order to that office. He merely sent the dossiers for review. He did not tell them to contact you, he did not direct them to contact the Attorney General, he did not tell them to prepare a warrant for the arrest of BHO.

These men have a sworn duty to uphold and defend the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, which is supposed to trump the UCMJ. If it no longer does in the eyes of the Joint Chief’s and their legal counsel then it is time for us to dig in! If the Attorney General will not act, the Congress will not act, and the Courts will not act it is incumbent upon the military to act! It appears that they too, are betraying their oaths. I am ashamed that such cowards and traitors are among the ranks of our Armed Forces! THEY should be the chief complainants in the court actions that you and others have filed. There should be no higher priority to them then to establish that the CINC is legitimate and the Constitution, and therefore the republic, is intact. Anything else IS cowardice and treachery.

There is no other conclusion,Counselor, then that the delay in responding to you and the passing to the Office of General Counsel “for review” is just more subterfuge, complicity, and treason.

Semper Fi,

Todd C. Salzer

 Very
Category: Legal Actions, Letters from Readers and Patriots, Letters/Feedback from Readers, Supporting Documentation, Uncategorized

Comments

2 Responses to “From reader Todd Saltzer re. UCMJ”

  1. J Radin
    July 5th, 2009 @ 1:37 pm

    I repost this comment here having also posted it previously.

    John Crawford says in his letter to Orly, Article 138 “is not suited for receiving or resolving complaints of misconduct by third party senior government officials.” There perhaps he’s not taking about the Commander in Chief. Not being familiar with the details of Orly’s complaints she may have included “third party senior government officials” along with Obama. In this case he is perhaps being silent on Obama, either wishing to take further consideration of the matter as things ripen or attempting to dismiss the matter all together. I’m not clear on his words. Bottom line, no comment by the Joint Chiefs of Staff does not mean they are passing the buck or are not deeply disturbed by the facts and allegation. Orly is operating and as an individual citizen must (for at least safety reasons) operate openly in public. Those in the military and in law enforcement often and wisely do not reveal their tactics and strategies to their adversaries.

    Regarding the ripening of this piece of bad fruit, Obama’s obvious treachery is still concealed from the masses by a rotten news media. Many and Orly especially have been making the rounds, getting the facts and allegations out. The facts are explosive (which also serves the Left’s agenda) and could rip this nation apart if not accepted and taken to heart by overwhelming numbers of people. There is a justifiable fear about large scale civil unrest. Anarchy is the nesting ground for Communist, NAZI and al Queda power grabs.

    Americans as a nation are famous for eventually doing the right thing. We will survive this and the national self doubt it will inflict. Eventually doing the right thing will instill a renewed national confidence and vigilance. The right results will not come instantaneously. The scale of this endeavor requires an ever broadening support before the tide turns completely. Orly Taitz is broadening and strengthening our movement to keep the USA a free republic.

  2. tmansc
    July 13th, 2009 @ 10:26 pm

    Dear J.,

    You certainly may be right, but the JCS certainly has the ear of Congress and these Constitutionally bound men could have forced the issue, via Congress, into the mainstream. Meanwhile, they take orders from the usurper and sacrafice American lives based on his orders. It does not matter if the mission is noble and likely the same were someone else the Commander in Chief. The fact is that if the JCS forced Congress to take a look by threatening to disobey orders, arrest the usurper or any other action, the WOULD become mainstram and the media would be forced to deal with the issue. The FACT that they have not indicates that they DO NOT intend to act. These ARE NOT pencil pushing bureaucrats – they are warriors – to whom nothing should be more sacred then their duty and the oaths they took. Requesting that Congress verify the elligibility of the Commander-in-Chief when there is so much doubt IS NOT a strategy. It is a duty. They are failing in their duty.

    Semper Fi