from reader Alec
Posted on | December 6, 2010 | 6 Comments
| Alec |
Submitted on 2010/12/06 at 8:42am
Par for the course. |
More on Siddharth Velamoor, Obama defense attorney, who was planted as an attorney-law clerk for judge Carter to defame me and derail my case. No answer from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on my appeal and demand to reverse Carter decision due to clear bias, lack of impartiality and improper influence by the White House |
Comments
6 Responses to “from reader Alec”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

December 6th, 2010 @ 1:50 pm
Alec is again mistaken. Kagan has tons of publications. She was one of the most prolific writers, so please recheck your sources.
You know that you only need four out of nine votes to get Cert? So Kagan’s vote was never needed.
December 8th, 2010 @ 7:00 am
From Mario Apuppo’s site: ONLY THREE VOTES WERE NEEDED WITHOUT SOTOMAYOR AND KAGAN.
“The two justices appointed by Obama who in my opinion had a direct financial conflict of interest (their very jobs and appointments to the court) in the outcome of this petition and case did not recuse themselves even though they should have! Their recusal was called for in our petition on page 36 with the relevant U.S. Code cited. The two justices and the court ignored that. There were recusals declared by these two Obama appointees in many other petitions including the one immediately before our petition in the orders list and the one immediately after. Imo, apparently the court needed all nine justices in the room to kill the petition. With the full court of 9 justices it’s the rule/vote of 4 to grant certiorari to move the case forward. With two recusals that would have left only 7 justices and it’s then the rule/vote of 3 to grant certiorari to move the case forward. I suspect the water cooler buzz at SCOTUS was that 3 justices were leaning for granting certiorari. So it looks like Sotomayer and Kagan ignored ethical considerations and stayed in the review of the petition to be sure it got killed, i.e., to be in that room to argue against Certiorari, and to require 4 votes to grant cert instead of 3 … financial conflict of interest and ethics be damned by those two justices.”
December 8th, 2010 @ 7:07 am
Elena Kagans publication record is here:
https://judgepedia.org/index.php/Elena_Kagan
As an academic, Dean of Harvard Law School, this appears a dismal publication record. It is certainly not “tons of publications.”
December 8th, 2010 @ 7:09 am
Whoops–typo. That is “Apuzzo”not Apuppo!”
December 10th, 2010 @ 8:58 am
Sorry, I meant to say Justice Kagan.