From an outraged citizen
Posted on | June 19, 2010 | No Comments
| Jim |
Submitted on 2010/06/18 at 6:34pm
So, Lamberth totally ignores the issue of the illegal use of a social security number – a federal crime. In a case Lamberth had back in 1994, he So, it seems for the minor charge of perjury ( as compared to social security fraud ), Lamberth is not only willing to notify the prosecutor to start an investigation ( could it be because of the Misprision statute ? ) but he also requested the AG to appoint an independent counsel to investigate – all for the charge of perjury. In this current case, there is a more serious charge. One of a crime committed ( and possibly still being committed ) against the United States by the President of the United States. So instead of requesting prosecutors to investigate the records or call for an independent counsel ( as he did with a minor perjury charge ) or even have the court itself investigate, what does he do ? – he ignores the charge . Lamberth, is it because this charge didn’t “insult the dignity of your robes ‘? Judge, you are a DISGRACE to your robes and to judicial ethics in general. You are nothing but a fraud. After this decision, every time you put on those robes, you are insulting both the law and justice. |
Order on Motion for Reconsideration in TAITZ v OBAMA 6-18-2010 1 # |
Comments
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 
