from a US Veteran Mr. Conckle to Judge Lamberth
Posted on | September 1, 2011 | 9 Comments
Chief Judge Royce C. Lambreth
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Ave. N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
Dear Judge Lambreth,
You have my empathy.
Sitting as a Federal Judge and handing down decisions on contentious cases no doubt leaves some individuals angry at you. Personally, my first reaction to your initial ruling dismissing Dr. Orly Taitz’ case to uncover President Obama’s real or fraudulent Social Security number was just that – anger. However, I wanted you to read this letter. So, I moderated my feelings. Anger is not a solid basis from which to ask any question. Let’s just say I’m confused and perhaps you can clear up my confusion.
I have read your bio. You appear to be a reasonable individual. Texan, Viet Nam Vet, former Chairman of the Professional Ethics Committee of the Federal Bar Association. And, you have demonstrated a willingness to confront government when you felt a wrong had been perpetrated. Specifically in your dealings with The Interior Department you said, “the court has wanted to simply wash its hands of (this situation), but to do so would constitute an announcement that negligence and incompetence in government are beyond judicial remedy.”
So here is my confusion: If, on the one hand, you are a no-nonsense straight shooting Texan and believe that a court should not simply “wash its hands” when it confronts government incompetence, why then would you do exactly that when your court is confronted by a level of potential abuse significantly more heinous than incompetence – fraud?
Please take a moment to reflect. I am not a wild man ranting in the night. I, too, am a Viet Nam Vet. I own a small business and love this country and the opportunities it offers as much as you do. I once swore, as you did, to “protect The Constitution of The United States against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.” That oath has not and will never expire for either of us.
Dr. Taitz brought reason into your court. She clearly explained that the highest elected official in America may have committed fraud. Your court could send an individual to jail for that offence, if proven. Yet, you have so far chosen to wash your hands and not deal with the issue. With all due respect, that deeply troubles me. Do you genuinely feel that this ruling is in line with that oath you took – to uphold the laws of this land?
I pray that your court will pause, think, reflect, and reconsider that not only is there merit in Dr. Taitz’ case, but that the people of The United States may be irreparably harmed if this matter is not resolved by your court.
Please allow this case to proceed. It would be the right thing to do. Will you do that?
All the best,
John Conkle
John Conkle, President and CEO
Boardwalk Collaboration Software, Inc.
510 1st Ave, #504
San Diego, CA 92101
619-702-7651
jconkle@boardwalkcollaboration.com
Comments
9 Responses to “from a US Veteran Mr. Conckle to Judge Lamberth”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

September 1st, 2011 @ 4:26 pm
Do you recommend we all write letters to the Judge, Orly?
September 1st, 2011 @ 5:18 pm
Mr. Conkle seems not to understand the ruling was only about FOIA Exemption 6.
September 2nd, 2011 @ 5:24 am
clearly Obots like you want me to say yes in order to complain about me to the bar. Though CA bar decided not to take action on any of thousands of complaints from Obots, I will not give you satisfaction or reason to write another complaint and claim, that I encouraged exparte communications with the judge. I never told anyone to do anything.
This is a free country. People are free to write to whom they want on their own. I am not telling them what to do.
September 2nd, 2011 @ 6:29 am
Unfortunately, there are numerous misconceptions about Social Security. For example, Obama has a SSN from a state where he has never lived.
In the Federal Foster Care system, the Foster Care child is considered to be a resident of the state/county that has court jurisdiction over the child’s care and control.
Federal regulations allow the court to delegate care and control to caretakers. As a result, caretaker relatives may reside in a county or state other than the one with jurisdiction.
Obama returned to the US as an unaccompanied minor with Indonesian citizenship in 1971. Consequently, he legally resided in Connecticut when his SS-5 was filed, but actually lived in Hawai’i.
September 2nd, 2011 @ 6:33 am
that is a complete BS
Obama was never a foster child
by the way, where is his Indonesian citizenship documentation? Where is proof, that he returned to US as an Indonesian citizen in 1971? show me a shred of evidence of what you are claiming
September 3rd, 2011 @ 6:12 am
@ShapeShipper,
Unfortunately, there are numerous irrefutable facts about Obama’s SSN. For example, the SSN on his Selective Service Registration form results in “NO RECORD” using the Social Security’s online SSN verification system.
As far as I know, you are the first person to publically claim that Obama was a foster child and that his foster parents lived in CT while he lived in HI. Where’s your proof?
September 4th, 2011 @ 6:39 pm
@ Racer Jim
You asking for proof is amazing.
What does proof mean in your world?
September 5th, 2011 @ 6:26 pm
Bob J.
We all are taking up a collection to get you some professional help. You make no sense at all.
When you see the white truck pull up with the sirens, you”ll know that your troubles are over. They will be able to pump the overdose of Obama Koolaid from your veins and what’s left of your brain.
By the way, proof is something that is backed up by irrefutable evidence, such as original documents.
September 9th, 2011 @ 11:19 am
@ The Truth
How many original documents do see everyday?
How many public officials have shared their ” documents” with you?
Serious question; do you have a serious answer. No need for the sad attempts at denigration. Argue on merit, not on vitirol and maybe you will learn something.