For N. Korean deal to succeed, the Iran deal has to be changed or replaced with another deal or else Kim will think that he can avoid sanctions by making a 10 year deal, as one in Iran, and restart nuclear buildup when a pushover US president gets in the WH
Posted on | April 27, 2018 | 5 Comments
@realDonaldTrump For N. Korean deal to succeed, the Iran deal has to be changed or replaced with another deal or else Kim will think that he can avoid sanctions by making a 10 year deal, as one in Iran, and restart nuclear buildup when a pushover US president gets in the WH
Comments
5 Responses to “For N. Korean deal to succeed, the Iran deal has to be changed or replaced with another deal or else Kim will think that he can avoid sanctions by making a 10 year deal, as one in Iran, and restart nuclear buildup when a pushover US president gets in the WH”
Leave a Reply













29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

April 27th, 2018 @ 9:08 pm
It will be of help, too, when Trump will not work the with present deal.
Make it hard, Mr President?!
Don’t let the french President or anyone else try to get you to accept the BAD deal that Iran wants us to work with.
April 28th, 2018 @ 8:28 am
It just show that we should not get into deals with more than two parties. Trump can withdraw from the Iran deal, but he can’t just fix it because Europe is in there, too. NO FOREIGN ENTANGLEMENTS!
April 28th, 2018 @ 12:48 pm
I suspect that this North Korean thing is another scam just like “agreements” with Iran. People have forgotten North Korea’s previous unenforceable “agreements” that it made with the gullible west in exchange for technology, food and other benefits that it abrogated soon after they received the bribe loot and/or money.
Trump, do not fall for unenforceable “promises” and “assurances”! Do NOT get SUCKERED (AGAIN)!
April 29th, 2018 @ 1:12 am
This could be possible…
That NK could be playing possum and just waiting to pounce…?
Several years ago, I discussed how we needed to have our power grid updated…
And Steve King actually got the House to work up a bill and had it passed…
So that no EMP could cause some real damage.
But he said later that the senate didn’t care about doing anything about it.
This appears to be…
The Swamp emerging from the shadows…?
April 29th, 2018 @ 8:33 am
#4 – The North has a history of provocation in order to get money from the U.S. and the South. Kim’s nuclear program is one of them. He knows the we will not attack him, so his nuclear program was just a huge and expensive bluff. We fell for it. We’re going to give him tons of aid (just watch) but nothing will change in the North. Kim will give up a nuclear program he didn’t need, and we’ll pay his bills.
Yes, there may be a formal end to the Korean War but after almost 70 years, what does that really change? It’s just words. And the North Korean people will only hear the parts the Kim wants them to know about. He’ll claim a victory over the U.S. and this time he’ll be right. And do you think we’ll ever hear another mention of Otto Wamrbier? I doubt it…