9 Responses to “did other people hear “nay””

1. Fred Dorsey
   February 26th, 2012 @ 5:22 pm

   Orly–The “Nay” vote is loud and clear at approximately 35:21 out of the total recorded time of 35:53. You can’t identify, of course,
   the speaker of the Nay vote.

   Cicero once said: “When you have no basis for argument, abuse the plaintiff.”

   All of you had a great deal of courage to withstand the way you were treated. It must have been very frustrating.

   Can you explain what “lodging” your documents means? I suspect it is the circular file, but
   would appreciate an explanation.

   There is no way to adequately express my gratitude for your efforts. I am sure that
   many, many others would voice the same feeling.

   Carry on.

2. orly taitz
   February 26th, 2012 @ 5:29 pm

   lodging is, that they are in the record, but the decision is not based on the documents. Chairman Dumezich stated, that we can go to the court and argue against that decision, the motion for reconsideration is coming

3. Veritas
   February 26th, 2012 @ 6:23 pm

   A Race Against Time!

   Meanwhile Canada Free Press is reporting:
   ————————–

   Recently, Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Soeren Kern wrote in his article “Caliphate Conference” Seeks to Islamize Europe, U.S.”:

   “The explicit aim of the Istanbul Process—currently backed by the Obama administration—is to make it an

   international crime to criticize Islam.

   A Muslim fundamentalist group is organizing a conference focused on turning Austria and other European countries into Islamic states.

4. JAK
   February 26th, 2012 @ 9:05 pm

   Muslims in the USA are like camels being staked on the outside of tents. The camels always poke their noses before they break loose and tear up the inside of the tent.

5. Anita
   February 26th, 2012 @ 9:10 pm

   Thank you for alllllll you do!!! You are extremely bold and smart!! I am a Hoosier (from Indiana) and was so happy to hear you were coming to Indianapolis, but was so afraid it would be like all others.

   My question::
   “Why can you not go after the DNC of 2008 when they made up TWO (2 !!!!!) different “Official Certification of Nomination forms??????
   Nancy Pelosi, chair, and Alice Travis Germond, Secretary signed and were notorized by Shalifa A. Williamson????? (Signed on same day!!)
   The paragraph that begins with “This is to Certify that at the National Convention of the Democractic Party of the Unite States of America, held in Denver………. state….date….. etc. “following were duly nominated as candidates of said Party for President and Vice President of the United States respectively:”

   For President of the U.S.
   Barack Obama
   (address in Chicago)

   For V.P. of the U.S.
   (address in Delaware

   The “other” Certification of Nomination has all of the above (blah, blah, blah, and when it comes to the WORD “RESPECTIVELY”: it goes ON to state the following……”of the United States Respectively… AND THAT THE FOLLOWING CANIDATES FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ARE LEGALLY QUALIFIED TO SERVE UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION:
   For President….
   (address)

   For V.P…….
   (address)

   Below that Nancy Pelosi and Alice Germond’s signatures are on there and was also notorized by Shalifa A. Williamson!!!!!!

   This tells anyone with an IQ of 80, that it was already known he was not a citizen!!!! Look in Jerome Corsi’s book “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” on p. 229 and 230 !!! Pictures of the certificate with signatures!! I can’t remember now what he said about what states got the one with all of the finished paragraph??? I believe he stated ONLY Hawaii got that one and all the others states got the one that LEFT OUT that they WERE LEGALLY QUALIFIED !! WOW WOW WOW WOW !!!!!!!

   These certificates were sent to states basically stating ” we have QUALIFIED them for you and here is our rubber stamp of approval”. They should all be tried and put in prison !!! That is why each state needs to look out for themselves, with crooks like that!

   Also why is it that in 2003, congress started trying to CHANGE the law for eligibility of president……and THEN he, Mr.”O”, spoke at 2004 convention…….AND they tried it 8 times total, up until 2007 or 2008????? to get it changed !!!!! HUMMM

   These things are questions I believe should be brought up at these hearings and purhaps subpeona these (quote..”ladies” )to answer under oath. (If that means anything to them!) Perhaps Soros can buy them out of it !!!

   Again “Thank you , Thank you, Thank you for all your hard labor and for having to withstand all the hateful judges and deaf ears! Now that Fox News is partly owned by a Muslim, we know eligibility can no longer be spoken now …….among other things !!

6. Mr Blobby
   February 27th, 2012 @ 2:19 am

   Thanks for that information Veritas. I hope that people will now understand the full impact of these developments in Europe.

   It really is amazing how cleverly underhand these biased ballot challenge hearing commissions have become. Managing on the day to convince Mr Sweihart, who was sitting only a few feet from them, that it was a 4-0 vote, when Mr Sweihart and everyone else can now clearly hear on the video that it was actually 3-1 was typical of their fraudulent behaviour. All 4 members certainly gave a convincing display of being strongly against the challenge throughout the hearing but obviously one of them did not want to actually break the law when it came to the vote.

   The significance of the described events in Europe to the blatant pretence that this vote was 4-0 when it was actually 3-1, is obvious to everyone who doubts the eligibility of the usurper.

   Thanks again Veritas for identifying this important connection.

7. Larry
   February 27th, 2012 @ 4:28 am

   Fred Dorsey…If you did hear 1 “nay”…It was there for a purpose….If there are charges of treason brought up on these clowns…they will use that as an out…”It was me who voted Nay”…I’m innocent of all charges.

8. TheEuropean
   February 27th, 2012 @ 4:43 am

   Dr. Taitz,

   are the Turcs standing before the walls of Vienna – again ?

   Sincerely

   Your European

9. PEV
   February 27th, 2012 @ 7:53 am

   The “nay” is loud and clear but who said it? The hearing was a disgusting pretense! I was happy to see Dr. Taitz visiting with some well-known GOP reps in CA. Thank you, Dr. Taitz, for your hard work and dedication.

Leave a Reply