15 Responses to “Conference call today with Congressman Raul Labrador”

1. Ann
   November 10th, 2011 @ 6:48 pm

   Rest assured, if it’s up to the media, it’ll be worse than the Monica Lewinsky affair. By that I mean, they will continue to ridicule “birthers” and will be calling all Republican representatives “birthers” too. I predict it’ll get ugly but who cares as long as that Usurping idiot is lead out in handcuffs! The rule of law is the ultimate judge.

2. Maynard
   November 10th, 2011 @ 7:45 pm

   Considering that your “evidence” and “facts” get disproved at every corner, all you would be doing here, is wasting Labrador’s time as well.

3. Ima Hafawit
   November 11th, 2011 @ 3:23 am

   Orly. It is clear, that you, are winning, this war, against, the Usurper and you, will continue, to win, this war, against, the Usurper, and with, Gods glorious light, you shed, on this matter, you are, going to, go down in, history books, as the hero, who knew too much.

   You may be my sister from another mother.

   Ima Hafawit, are you?

4. Patty
   November 11th, 2011 @ 5:27 am

   Definitely, keep contacting members of the Committee,Senators, Congressmen. Don’t let this issue get lost among the many matters that are being considered by the Hill. Call Eric Cantor and send him Orly’s massive evidence!

5. Russell Bennett
   November 11th, 2011 @ 5:52 am

   If we ever get to check the microfilm and prove it is a fake the press will turn on Obama just like they did on the ex governor of Illinois Blagojevich. When there was proof the press jumped all over him. We will get all kinds of stories about Obama that their afraid to tell now.Remember the judges book It is dangerous to be right when the goverment is wrong.

6. orly taitz
   November 11th, 2011 @ 6:25 am

   no, you sound like a sister of another obot

7. John
   November 11th, 2011 @ 7:22 am

   Such witty repartee, Orly!

8. William
   November 11th, 2011 @ 9:17 am

   Maynard
   November 10th, 2011 @ 7:45 pm

   …”Considering that your “evidence” and “facts” get disproved at every corner”..

   ________________________________

   Maynard, Please do tell…

   Which Court in the United States “disproved” anything pertaining to “Evidence” submitted?

   Thanks

9. William
   November 11th, 2011 @ 9:51 am

   John,

   There is no secret of your support and playing back-up for Patty in this blog. That is an obvious given.

   It was once said; “In order to catch the stray fish; use the right bait.”

   You and Patty, took it: “Hook-line-and sinker.”

10. hippybiker
    November 11th, 2011 @ 11:24 am

    John, are you Holders Gay lover? Inquiring minds would like to know.

11. Carl Manning
    November 11th, 2011 @ 11:49 am

    The Mind Control Media turned on Blagoyevich because there was evidence heavily implicating Barack Obama in the FBI’s recorded conversations of Rod Blagoyevich and there was highly embarrassing evidence about Obama’s and Rahm Emanuel’s gay lifestyle in Chicago. The prosecuting US Attorney, Fitzgerald, an Obama lackey, along with the federal judge intentionally suppressed this evidence at the trial…

    From the Wayne Madsen Report…

    “…Last month, Blagojevich’s trial judge, U.S. District Court
    judge James Zagel, a crony of former Illinois Republican
    Governor Jim Thompson, ruled that all 500 hours of phone calls
    intercepted and taped by Fitzgerald could not be played during
    Blagojevich’s trial as demanded by Blagojevich and his defense
    lawyers. Blagojevich demanded that Fitzgerald “show up in court
    and explain to everybody . . . why you don’t want those tapes
    that you made played in court.”

    WMR has learned that the tapes may contain salty references to
    Obama’s and Emanuel’s private lives.

    WMR attempted to interview Blagojevich’s senior defense lawyer
    Sam Adam to no avail but other informed sources told us that
    the tapes, if played, would highlight the corruption of not
    only Obama, Emanuel, and other member of Obama’s Chicago
    “brain trust” but also Fitzgerald himself. WMR was told that
    Fitzgerald’s tactics have included providing sex and drugs
    to imprisoned felons to get them to provide perjured testimony
    at federal trials.

    It is exactly the type of federal prosecutorial misconduct by
    Fitzgerald that former Republican Governor said was used by
    state prosecutors when he commuted the death sentences of
    Illinois’s death row population. Ryan was indicted by Fitzgerald
    for fraud and he is currently serving out a federal prison sentence…”

12. Lucinda
    November 12th, 2011 @ 4:56 am

    He raised a new concern, which I did not hear before. He wanted to make sure, that the birth certificate issue will not resemble Monica Lewinsky affair
    ———————————-

    I’m not sure what to think. Does this mean that the committee is actually planning to investigate the fraud?

    So let it resemble Monica Lewinsky! Who cares! As long as this matter starts taking over the headlines and people see what is happening and what has happened to our country!

13. john
    November 15th, 2011 @ 2:56 am

    @Hippy – No, I’m heterosexual. But since you’re obviously fantasizing about having an affair with Eric Holder, why not write him a love letter? I’m sure he’ll appreciate it.

    @William – “That is an obvious given” – can a given be anything but obvious? Look up the word “redundant” and see if you can make anything of the definition.
    “In order to catch the stray fish; use the right bait.” The stray fish? Why not just say “In order to catch a fish, use the right bait”? It’s because your writing skills match the level of your sanity, William.

14. john
    November 17th, 2011 @ 1:06 am

    @William – Although Patty and I sometimes share similar points of view, I neither know her nor “play back up for her”. I also think my wife of 30 years would take a dim view of any “late night dinner dates” with anyone but her.
    You and RacerJim share many views, and yet do I point out the obvious possibility of a romantic entanglement between the two of you? Of course not.
    You stay classy, William.

Leave a Reply