Bombshell: Orders revoked for soldier challenging
Posted on | July 15, 2009 | 14 Comments
Bombshell: Orders revoked for soldier challenging prez
Major victory for Army warrior questioning Obama’s birthplace
Posted: July 14, 2009
9:53 pm Eastern
By Chelsea Schilling
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Dr. Orly Taitz
A U.S. Army Reserve major from Florida scheduled to report for deployment to Afghanistan within days has had his military orders revoked after he argued that he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his legitimacy for office.His attorney, Orly Taitz, confirmed to WND the military has rescinded his impending deployment orders.“We won! We won before we even arrived,” she said with excitement. “It means that the military has nothing to show for Obama. It means that the military has directly responded by saying Obama is illegitimate – and they cannot fight it. Therefore, they are revoking the order!”She continued, “They just said, ‘Order revoked.’ No explanation. No reasons – just revoked.”A hearing on the questions raised by Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook, an engineer who told WND he wants to serve his country in Afghanistan, was scheduled for July 16 at 9:30 a.m.“As an officer in the armed forces of the United States, it is [my] duty to gain clarification on any order we may believe illegal. With that said, if President Obama is found not to be a ‘natural-born citizen,’ he is not eligible to be commander-in-chief,” he told WND only hours after the case was filed.“[Then] any order coming out of the presidency or his chain of command is illegal. Should I deploy, I would essentially be following an illegal [order]. If I happened to be captured by the enemy in a foreign land, I would not be privy to the Geneva Convention protections,” he said.The order for the hearing in the federal court for the Middle District of Georgia from U.S. District Judge Clay D. Land said the hearing on the request for a temporary restraining order would be held Thursday.Cook said without a legitimate president as commander-in-chief, members of the U.S. military in overseas actions could be determined to be “war criminals and subject to prosecution.”He said the vast array of information about Obama that is not available to the public confirms to him that “something is amiss.”“That and the fact the individual who is occupying the White House has not been entirely truthful with anybody,” he said. “Every time anyone has made an inquiry, it has been either cast aside, it has been maligned, it has been laughed at or just dismissed summarily without further investigation.“You know what. It would be so simple to solve. Just produce the long-form document, certificate of live birth,” he said.He said he was scheduled to report for duty tomorrow, on July 15, to deploy to Afghanistan as part of President Obama’s plan to increase pressure of insurgent forces there.He told WND he would be prepared for a backlash against him as a military officer, since members of the military swear to uphold and follow their orders. However, he noted that following an illegal order would be just as bad as failing to follow a legal order.Named as defendants in the case are Col. Wanda Good, Col. Thomas Macdonald, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Obama, described as “de facto president of the United States.According to the court filing, Cook affirmed when he joined the military, he took the following oath: “I, Stefan Frederick Cook, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the president of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to the regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”According to the claim, “Plaintiff submits that it is implicit though not expressly stated that an officer is and should be subject to court-martial, because he will be derelict in the performance of his duties, if he does not inquire as to the lawfulness, the legality, the legitimacy of the orders which he has received, whether those orders are specific or general.“The military courts offer no option for raising the question, so he turned to civilian courts to consider “a question of paramount constitutional and legal importance: the validity of the chain of command under a president whose election, eligibility, and constitutional status appear open to serious question.”“Barack Hussein Obama, in order to prove his constitutional eligibility to serve as president, basically needs only produce a single unique historical document for the Plaintiff’s inspection and authentication: namely, the ‘long-form’ birth certificate which will confirm whether Barack Hussein Obama was in fact born to parents who were both citizens of the United States in Honolulu, Hawaii, in or about 1961,” explains the complaint.Taitz said she will attend the hearing to amend the temporary restraining order to an injunction because more members of the military have joined the cause.“We are going to be asking for release of Obama’s records because now this completely undermines the military. It revoked this order, but it can come up with another order tomorrow. It can come up with orders for other people,” she said. “Am I going to be flying around the country 1,000 times and paying the fees every time they issue an order?”Taitz said the issue “must be resolved immediately,” and she will continue working to ensure Obama proves he is eligible for office.“We’re going to be asking the judge to issue an order for Obama to provide his vital records to show he is legitimately president,” she said. “We’re going to say, we have orders every day, and we’ll have revocations every day. This issue has to be decided.”She said there cannot be any harm to the president if he is legitimately holding office.“If he is legitimate, then his vital records will prove it,” Taitz said. “If he is illegitimate, then he should not have been there in the first place.”Asked what this decision means for every other serviceman who objects to deployment under a president who has not proven he is eligible for office, Taitz responded:“Now, we can have each and every member of the military – each and every enlistee and officer – file something similar saying ‘I will not take orders until Obama is legitimately vetted.'”Multiple questions have been raised about what that would mean to the 2008 election, to the orders and laws Obama has signed and other issues, including whether he then is a valid commander-in-chief of the military.
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
14 Responses to “Bombshell: Orders revoked for soldier challenging”














29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

July 15th, 2009 @ 7:46 am
Mazel Tov Orly
July 15th, 2009 @ 11:49 am
Dr. Orly,
I posted a question on another blog and this was the response. I’m posting it here because we all need to be aware of other angles that might be playing out. All of us want to help you fully win against the usurper in the White House. May God grant you favor in ALL that you are doing. Elisabeth
******************************************************
From a reader: I’m not a lawyer but in the papers Dr. Orly filed, when she requested his birth certificate, didn’t she define Natural Born Citizen being born in the US with 2 US parents? How can that change even if Obama comes up with another forgery as his father was never a citizen?
This is what i was referring to, in that, if Obama did come out with a new forgery, he could “play into” Andy Martin’s theory that Obama’s Father was actually Frank Marshall Davis.
We have two key things that seem to allude to a coming “vault certificate” forgery, and they are:
* A news site, just came out today and said Obama does have the verifiable documents (see Drudge’s site for that story)
* And, Press Secretary Gibbs’ stated that he would interview the Doctor who delivered Obama as proof to Lester the reporter asking the BC questions
You can’t hardly interview a Doctor with any credibility unless that person’s name is on a long-form vault copy Birth Certificate.
As posted on this site earlier, there seemed to be some credible information from an inside source stating Obama was working on a long-form Vault copy forgery. Here is the text from that message:
“Don’t know about 9/11 conspiracy, but do know from DC source that an Administration team is working on perfecting a forgery of the long-form birth certificate. They plan on presenting it in a a month or so. The source is FBI agent who has drinking buddy from University of Illinois now in the Administration. Its second hand, but the source is supposed to be solid.
They have already prepared the forgery with special paper and ink. The document was printed on a fully functional 1960 Heidelberger printing press located at a print museum in Toronto. Access was arranged by a trustee of the museum who is connected to a large Canadian banking/investment firm with major US interests.
The blanks in the forged form were filled in with an old Underwood Manual typewriter bought at an estate sale in Skokie, IL. The raised seal was the easiest piece to fake, since you can by a special order corporate seal from just about any online office supply store.
The only reason they haven’t rolled out the foregery yet is that it is “seasoning” under mild UV light and a back and forth rotation between between a humidifier and a sauna. Get ready….one to two months tops.
Let’s look what has happened in the last couple weeks leading up to these recent break-thrus, with regard to eligibility hearings by the Obama minions:
* Any affiliated White House propaganda sites reporting Obama’s hospital as “Queens” were changed to “Kapi’olani”
* Any sites carrying the Certificate of Live Birth image were scrubbed
What would that tell you? Based on these actions, it is very likely a new forgery is ready with a different Father’s name and Obama’s birth hospital on this forgery would be listed at Kapi’olani. The Certificate of Live birth images have been scrubbed to remove the associations that “Obama lied about his Father” on that certificate. The COLB will no longer be supported reminding people of such.
Now, it will be tough to pass off a potential new forgery, but doesn’t mean it cannot or hasn’t been done before. Obama will also have to release his college and passport records, along with a copy of his Selective Service Registration. The best scenerio for Obama and his planners would be to contest the release of those “other” records as to only release the long-form vault copy of his birth certificate.
A new forgery will get several different experts evaluating the certificate. Obama would certainly pay his own “experts” to come up with the desired conclusion of “it is an authentic document” as opposed to potentially any independent experts saying the document was a forgery. In any case, this would be to Obama’s advantage, as the results would be considered inconclusive and therefore an effective ruling cannot be made.
Orly and other eligibility lawyers must make sure to collect the other records (not just the birth certificate), and to have numerous experts with document analysis experience and credentials ready to examine any such document.
Also, the names, dates and places on the potential forgery must be followed-up and validated to the last detail. The Lawyers and Plantiffs must be able to show that there may have been a leak as to a potential forgery and that a 1960s Hilderberg Printing Press was sold on April 14th of this year at a UK auction.
The revoking of Major Cook’s order of deployment also indicates a new long-form forgery is ready. Major Cook stated he will not be deployed until Obama has proven his eligibility.
Oh, and get ready for all the racist propaganda and accusations, which has nothing at all to do with this. Only those who would even try to bring up or make it a racist issue are either racist, or really grasping at straws. The racism card is usually the last thing in terms of lame accusations. Go figure.
And .. Obama is only a 25% Black anyhow. He has more Arabic ancestory than Black ancestory. If, indeed, his Father was Barack H. Obama Sr. – then his Grandpa on his Dad’s side was a Middle Easterner. All that is irrelevent.
July 15th, 2009 @ 12:13 pm
Everyone needs to call their senators and demand hearings on Barry’s eligibility! If they do not act immediately, they may be guilty of being an accomplice to treason!
They all took an oath to uphold the constitution. The constitution is under attack. Orly has drawn the line in the sand, which side are they on. This is huge! The military is in a shamble!
And Orly, more then “Mazel Tov”, may GOD Bless your work and life. He is able to protect you just as he did Queen Esther. You were born for this time.
July 15th, 2009 @ 12:43 pm
I caution on future actions by the military.
There is a difference between “revoked” and “rescinded” in the military. “Revoked” implies that some sort of punitive action will follow. “Rescinded” is a simple cancellation of the orders for whatever reason without prejudice.
I think the US Army “revoked” the orders to make Orly’s suit a moot point. Then they can go after Major Cook under the UCMJ for all kinds of charges.
God bless, Major Cook for sticking his neck out. Rally round him boys if the US Army tries to stick it to him.
July 15th, 2009 @ 1:07 pm
Posted by “null and void” at Free Republic.com:
Nice try to remove Maj Cooks’ “standing” Mr 0bama!
Not so fast there. If you are, as we strongly suspect, not constitutionally qualified to be the President and CiC, you aren’t qualified to rescind an order either.
If Maj Cook and Dr Taitz fall into your trap and drop the suit they have tacitly agreed that you have the authority to issue a lawful order.
BUT If Maj Cook and Dr Taitz continue the suite based on your original illegal order and assert that you do not have the legal authorty to overturn the illegal order to send his unit to Afghanistan what happens?
All those people who accused Maj Cook of being a combat-avoiding-coward lose any credibility that they may have had by insisting that putting his career and future life on the line was only to slither out of a combat assignment.
Now he’d be suing to be lawfully sent TO combat. What could you do? Issue another illegal order to rescind the illegal rescinding of the first illegal order? Puh-lease.
Sorry, Mr Obama. Your only choice now is to show your legitimate birth certificate and have everything you have signed into law, and every appointment you have made as alleged president instantly rendered null and void, or you can step down and hope they remain in force.
Choose.
July 15th, 2009 @ 6:05 pm
Roll out the Champaign! L’chaim Everyone!!!
(And for those out there that understand hebrew I shall shout, “Didun Notzach!!”)
July 16th, 2009 @ 6:13 am
Back to the case at hand. Orly now has a moot case. Under this thread, I was the first one that pointed out the difference in military jargon between “revoke” and “rescind.” I pointed out the word “revoke” indicated that the military was planning something of a punitive nature under the UCMJ.
However, never in my wildest dreams would I ever have imagined that the DoD would pull a person’s clearance — and make one ineligible for employment — BEFORE the person had his day in court. THAT IS ILLEGAL!!!
If true that government — and not the employer who buckled under intimidation — forced the firing, there is something very, very wrong with the system in the Department of Defense. They stepped over the bounds of what is legal — and open to all kinds of legal action. I’m not sure if Major Cook has protection under the Whistleblower statutes, but there must be other laws that protect him.
I know that talking about the “natural born citizen” debate is more interesting, but I am worried about a military man — a citizen soldier — who has just been hung out to dry by his government — and worse, his own people — the fellow soldiers in the Department of Defense.
Orly,
What are we going to do to support and defend Major Cook? WE, THE PEOPLE encouraged him to take this stand — and I am proud that he did. But now that he is in trouble, what kind of plan do WE take to protect him? I’m a retired military officer and I want to stand behind him — and I think a lot of other vets want to do so as well.
Will you be the spokesperson for Major Cook? If not, who will be his lawyer? How can we contact him/her to provide any support Major Cook needs in his fight to protect his livelihood — a thing that was guaranteed by LAW as a citizen soldier when he was activated, but yanked out from under him in the most despicable manner.
WE THE PEOPLE encouraged Major Cook to take a stand. WE THE PEOPLE have a moral obligation now to stand behind him.
July 17th, 2009 @ 9:13 am
Can you imagine the hoopla that will emerge when “dear leader” is finally removed from office, especially from cult who consider him to be “god”. There anguish will be “priceless”
July 19th, 2009 @ 8:04 am
Start true, end true.
July 19th, 2009 @ 8:51 pm
So when will he be packing upand moving from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. ?
July 21st, 2009 @ 12:04 am
Simple. Where’s the birth certificate. I’m 70 and I have my orginal. Not a certificate of live birth.
July 21st, 2009 @ 1:12 am
I hope this matter will be fully answerd once and for all! For everyones sake
July 21st, 2009 @ 1:14 am
I Hope you will and can put this to rest!! For the sake of all Americans
July 21st, 2009 @ 9:30 am
I’m glad that there is someone fighting for AMERICA! Home of the Brave, Land of the Free, One Nation Under GOD!