more research
Posted on | May 20, 2009 | 7 Comments
I remember there was a case, where one judge issued a writ of mandamus in re to ballots in TX. It wasn’t a conference, just one judge. I don’t recall whether it was SCOTUS or appellate court. I am getting exhausted and can’t remember. Does anyone know the name of the judge?
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
7 Responses to “more research”












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

May 20th, 2009 @ 11:34 am
Orly,
Please don’t destroy your health working on this “Obama” birth issue 23/7. Please take some time off to get some extra sleep and enjoy being with your family. There are many many people behind the scenes working on this “Obama” birth issue. You are certainly not alone in this fight against “Obama” The Usurper.
Also please know that Joseph Farah has started a wildly popular nation-wide billboard campaign to pressure “Obama” into the open.
For more on World Net Daily’s bill board campaign go to
https://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98589
May 20th, 2009 @ 12:11 pm
I think Mr. Farah is doing a great job and I have outmost respect for him, mr. Unruh, Chelsea Schilling and the rest of their staff
May 20th, 2009 @ 12:47 pm
Dear Orly;;;;;
I am a national springboard master diving champian . and have competed in three world games .
I know the work that you are putting into this project. and see you are getting closser to your goal of prosicuting Obama for his lawness and fraud actions.
I liken your effort to the preperation of mine,to compete on the world schale,too yours. You can over train your body and mind in this indever.
and become flat when you need the beast from you self.
Do not become flat or allow yourself too become exhousted.
You must take a day off,and completeley do somethink else not ass. with this work ;;;
Now do it . America needs you at your best .
Love and your faimley
God Bless
G.B.
May 20th, 2009 @ 2:22 pm
I doubt it was SCOTUS, as, researching that topic, it appears that SCOTUS has not issued mandamus in over 70 years. Granted it’s not exhaustive, but that was results I found while searching for some unrelated information.
May 20th, 2009 @ 3:43 pm
maybe it was the court of appeals in TX
May 20th, 2009 @ 4:46 pm
Based on the research, and the fact that elections are state issues, that would be a good assumption, if indeed it happened at all.
May 20th, 2009 @ 10:45 pm
TX judge Burt Carnes has allowed me to represent Jody Brockhausen against Secretary of State of TX, he has signed my application to represent her Pro Hac Vice (out of state attorney), but his decision was that he has no jurisdiction to hear the case in the state court.
It looked like his mind was made even before the hearing. He asked Assistant Attorney General how much time does she need, she stated 15-20 minutes, his response was that he needs only 3 minutes. He didn’t even ask the plaintiff if she needs any time. When I protested, he originally was not willing to let me talk. When I asked him to allow me to represent her pro hac vice, pro bono after I made an effort of flying and driving from CA all night long, he stated that he didn’t sign pro hca vice application, at which time I told him that there is nothing preventing him from signing it now. He finally agreed. I’ve stated that the examples given by the AJ relate to Fed Court and issues before the elections.
To the best of my knowledge there is nothing in TX law or precedents preventing a citizen from having standing and presenting a grievance and seeking resolution of violation of her civil rights in seeking verification of eligibility and legitimacy of the siting president. Judge Carnes provided no response and simply stated that there is no jurisdiction and pretty much told us to go, which we certainly did by going straight to the US attorney’s office with a criminal complaint whereby my client’s civil rights under 1st, 14 9 and 10th amendment were violated. If there is no jurisdiction in Federal court and State court, then the citizens have there civil rights de facto taken away from them and they are reduced to a level of slaves. A group of patriots and I had a meeting with Assistant US attorney Chris Peele and Chief US Attorney for the North-Western district of TX for Criminal matters, Chris Peele . Mr. Durbin agreed to hear the matter and asked for our paperwork. We were shocked to find out how little they knew about the matter. Mr. Peele told us that he was under the impression that the case was heard on the merits. They had no clue that no Obama ineligibility case was ever heard on the merits, not one judicial subpoena was ever issued and nobody has ever seen his original birth certificate.
Currently we are coordinating efforts to schedule personal meetings of groups of volunteers with Chief US attorneys for criminal matters in each and every district of the US. Mr. Ken Burr and George Lewis will be in charge of this projct.