One Response to “Bill Gates is pushing for recycling of sewage into drinking voter”

1. truly
   January 6th, 2015 @ 7:06 pm

   Speaking of sewage:

   January 6 from
   https://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com
   …identity fraud and Mickey Mouse media
   Exclusive: Diana West blasts press’ ‘psychosis of denial’ in coverage of president
   Published: 2 hours ago………. issued to him, and that his Social Security number does not pass the U.S. government’s own E-Verify test.
   The Obama legal response? Obama lawyer Michael Jablonski tried to deflect the Social Security issue – which itself indicates an epic case of possible felony fraud – not by proving the allegations to be false and ridiculous, but rather by pointing out that “NOTHING IN THE CONSTITUTION MAKES… PARTICIPATING IN SOCIAL SECURITY A PREREQUISITE TO SERVING AS PRESIDENT.”
   Is that what a normal person, even a president, who has a regular old Social Security number would do?
   The simplest line of defense is always going to be the truth – if, that is, one’s Social Security number is on the up-and-up. The Obama defense, however, was to bypass the fraud charges altogether and point out that having a Social Security number is not a prerequisite to serving as president!
   Isn’t this rather curious legal strategy worth some media scrutiny – maybe even just one follow-up question? Nope. Gotta stake out that presidential putting green.
   Walking away from allegedly dirty documents became the basis of the Obama defense. Obama lawyers took this same tack – not to defend allegedly false identity documents but rather show them to be irrelevant to presidential eligibility – in a 2012 New Jersey ballot challenge. (More unusually, so did the administrative law judge in the case, Jeff Masin, who actually seemed to help Obama lawyer Alexandra Hill stick to her own team’s defensive strategy.) In the New Jersey case, the Obama defense rested on the fact that because Obama did not present his birth certificate to state election officials (and, by law, was not required to do so), forgery or not, it was irrelevant to his eligibility to appear on the ballot.
   As Judge Mazin put it: “So the question of whether the document that is produced turns out to be a forgery, it seems to me is irrelevant because he hasn’t produced it.” Obama lawyer Hill later replied: “You could have Mickey Mouse … and everyone could sign up and go with it.”
   No further questions, said the media – in fact, no questions at all.
   …………..

Leave a Reply