Beware, allegations without a sworn notarized affidavit can be a hoax and a set up to discredit us
Posted on | August 5, 2011 | 5 Comments
I saw a you-tube clip by Jonathan Polland, where he claims, that he is the one, who forged Obama’s short form BC.
First, short form bc is no longer an issue. We are verifying the long form BC.
Second, I contacted Dr. Polland (pseudonym Polarick) before and asked, if he will be willing to make a sworn notarized affidavit, and he refused. So, it can be a hoax and a set up to discredit us. I’ve seen a lot of those along the way. We connot rely on a video clip by someone.
At this point, it doesn’t even matter, who the forger was. Bottom line, Long form BC posted by Obama is not a scan of a certified copy of an original 1961 BC for Obama. It is a computer generated forgery. If it would be anyone else, the prosecuter would not even care, who the forgerwas. A person using a forged BC and a fraudulently obtained SSN ID would be indicted, convicted and serving a prison term. Obama is not above the law. He belongs in the Big House and not in the White House. If officials in HI and members of the Judiciary are not doing their job and not prosecuting him, they need to stand trial for aiding and abetting all of the crimes he committed and for misprision of felony. A crime like this cannot and will not be swept under the rug, all of the people involved will stand trial sooner or later.
Comments
5 Responses to “Beware, allegations without a sworn notarized affidavit can be a hoax and a set up to discredit us”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

August 5th, 2011 @ 2:16 pm
Hoax: This video is a hoax designed by Pollard to gain viewers. He admits this in his comments on the video. He’s a publicity whore of the worst type. Pollard is a pathetic provocateur.
August 5th, 2011 @ 2:42 pm
You have that one right, and all the members of the General Staff who facilitated his illegal activity by failing to verify his status.
August 5th, 2011 @ 3:49 pm
when are you going to debate me?
August 6th, 2011 @ 6:56 am
S. Feinstein,
You and debate, fact/truth based debate that is, are mutually exclusive.
August 6th, 2011 @ 6:34 pm
The only problem is finding a court in this country that isn’t totally corrupt. The US judicial system is just one big organized crime ring. Samolian courts have more integrity.