OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Ben Carson is saying that we should rethink the actions by the Supreme Court in de facto creating new laws instead of evaluating constitutionality of laws passed by the Congress

Posted on | May 10, 2015 | 5 Comments

  • Ben Carson: US should rethink Supreme Court review of laws

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson says the United States should rethink the notion that a president must enforce laws the Supreme Court declares constitutional.

    Associated Press
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

5 Responses to “Ben Carson is saying that we should rethink the actions by the Supreme Court in de facto creating new laws instead of evaluating constitutionality of laws passed by the Congress”

  1. Linda
    May 10th, 2015 @ 6:58 pm

    He believes that because of the many decisions that the SCOTUS has made that are blatantly unconstitutional (e.g., Obamacare).

  2. HB
    May 11th, 2015 @ 3:52 am

    The Supreme court judges are not special. Like any other public servant if they don’t do their jobs they can be impeached. That is, if the house and senate stand up on their hind legs and grow a set.

  3. Kelly2
    May 11th, 2015 @ 4:28 am

    People like Ginsburg on the Supreme Court can tell our Senators what the laws hey passed really mean because our Senators are too stupid to know anything about the laws they passed- I can never forgive Clinton for appointing Ginsburg-

  4. Kevin J Lankford
    May 11th, 2015 @ 5:36 am

    Not sure what he means by such a statement. Is he trying to claim that all power should rest in the presidency?

    Any how the real problem with the supreme court is their misguided notion that it is their purpose to interpret the intent of our founding fathers and actually are authorize to redefine every word and context of our ruling document, betraying their true purpose to assure adherence to the principles held by the founders of our country, and their oath of allegiance to the Constitution.

    It is this very betrayal that put a fraud and foreign infiltrator in our white house and has opened the door for more. Only the ignorant, liars, or cowards, will refer to obama as president.

  5. Rich
    May 11th, 2015 @ 11:06 am

    The framers of the Constitution were divided on whether or not the Supreme Court was a good idea. We now can understand why some were opposed to it. This court has been corrupted and is proof that it was a bad idea. It should be abolished. Words mean different things to them when it becomes necessary to take away the freedoms written in plain English. For instance “shall not be abridged” means just the opposite when it concerns religious freedom. The court has ruled discrimination is prohibited by individuals and businesses and is allowed by government even though the intent of the Constitution is just the opposite. Taxation without representation was a big “no no” with the framers that is why it was specifically prohibited by the no bill of attainder clause. This court (Roberts specifically) has stated that the congress can tax any or all of us unequally any amount for any reason.

Leave a Reply