OrlyTaitzEsq.com

TaitzReport.com

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation (DOFF)
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita CA, 92688
Copyright 2014

Review of Politics, Economics, Constitution, Law and World Affairs by Attorney and Doctor Orly Taitz


If you love your country, please help me fight this creeping tyranny and corruption.
Donations no matter how small will help pay for airline and travel expenses.





The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Dr. Taitz, Esq., who has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
Mail donations to:
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, c/o Dr. Orly Taitz
29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, Ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688.
Contact Dr. Taitz at
orly.taitz@gmail.com.
In case of emergency, call 949-683-5411.

When the people fear their government, there is tyranny.
When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
-- Thomas Jefferson

During times of universal deceit, telling the truth
becomes a revolutionary act.  -- George Orwell

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they
fight you, then you win.  -- Mahatma Gandhi

Being a member of citizens militia is our unalienable right based on second amendment.

Posted on | May 3, 2009 | 5 Comments

  WATCHER

EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 15, 1791 AMENDMENT II.

A WELL REGULATED MILITIA, BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE, THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
Category: Uncategorized

Comments

5 Responses to “Being a member of citizens militia is our unalienable right based on second amendment.”

  1. Jacqlyn Smith
    May 3rd, 2009 @ 5:28 pm

    I received this from a friend of mine who used to be in the military…..don’t know if it is true but please pass this forward and someone find out if the IMPOSTER is trying to take over the military as well as all the branches of our government…….this is very dangerous and something that can not be tolerated!!! Please read and forward ASAP!!!!
    **********************************************************

    If I were still in the Military, it would be a “COLD DAY IN HELL” before I would pledge an oath to the “SCUM BAG” impersonating the president!!

    Subject: ACTION NEEDED for military tradition; and for the military among us; Hitler did this.

    Military to Pledge Oath To Obama, Not Constitution …………

    Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is extremely frustrated with orders that the White House is contemplating. According to sources at the Pentagon, including all branches of the armed forces, the Obama Administration may break with a centuries-old tradition.

    A spokesman for General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, states that the Obama Administration wants to have soldiers and officers pledge a loyalty oath directly to the office of the President, and no longer to the Constitution. “The oath to the Constitution is as old as the document itself,” the spokesman said, “At no time in American history, not even in the Civil War, did the oath change or the subject of the oath differ. It has always been to the Constitution.”

    The back-and-forth between the White House and the Defense Department was expected as President George W. Bush left office. President Obama has already signed orders to close Guantanamo and to pull combat troops from Iraq. But, this, say many at the Defense Department, goes too far. “Technically, we can’t talk about it before it becomes official policy,” the spokesman continued. “However, the Defense Department, including the Secretary, will not take this laying down. Expect a fight from the bureaucracy and the brass.”

    Sources at the White House had a different point of view. In a circular distributed by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, the rationale for the change was made more clear. “The President feels that the military has been too indoctrinated by the old harbingers of hate: nationalism, racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the American society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities like those at Abu Ghraib.” “We expect a lot of flak over this,” the classified memo continues. “But those that would be most against it are those looking either for attention or control.”

    The time frame for the changes are unknown. However, it is more likely that the changes will be made around the July 4th holiday, in order to dampen any potential backlash. The difference in the oath will actually only be slight. The main differences will be the new phrasing. It is expected that the oath to the Constitution will be entirely phased out within two years.

  2. Army D.A.V.
    May 3rd, 2009 @ 5:49 pm

    Yes, it’s called the state national guard now, sign up.

  3. de Vattel: A natural born citizen is born in the coutnry of parentS who are citizens thereof
    May 4th, 2009 @ 4:02 am

    Army DAV.

    Its not called the National Guard now, the National Guard was established by Congress at the end of the 19th century, as an auxiliary to the Armed Forces of the USA.

    The State Militias do not exist anymore, but can legally do so.

    See this section of the US Constitution, dear Promise Keeper….

    Article I, Section 8:
    https://www.tyranttamer.com/constitution_for_the_united_stat.php#cpre

    “To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;”

    If the National Guard was the Milita spoken of here, then there are many things done which are unconstitutional, but as it is not, there are not.

    Patriotic States who have reaffirmed their constitutionally recognized sovereignty, need to form State Militias in the proper sense, which are not funded by Congress nor need to be imployed in the service of the Federal Governement

    Sovreignty by definition requires an armed force to protect it. The States have a right to raise and maintain such a foce, even if it is only citizen volunteers who are invited to do so. In some states, counties and towns might have this power, where the State Constitution does not prohibit this, nor specify how the Militia is to be raised.

    So take political action now and get laws and regulations on the books of your state, established ASAP.

    State politicians will be more open if you emphasis that the volunteers will bring their own equipment. Maybe even have laws allowing volunteer organizations to get non profit status to raise money from donations of state patriots….

  4. pjr
    May 4th, 2009 @ 9:17 am

    Army D.A.V., said;

    “Yes, it’s called the state national guard now, sign up.”

    EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 15, 1791, AMENDMENT II:

    A WELL REGULATED MILITIA, BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE, THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

    If the State National Guard is the Constitutional Citizens Militia, where was it (the National Guard) back when the Second Amendment was first declared Law? The Constitutional Citizens Militia CANNOT, and should not be counterfeited by the National Guard. They are two different entities. What? Are we now going to allow the National Guard to “USURP” the Constitutional Citizens Militia?

    The national Guard was created in 1903 as a result of the passing of the “Militia Act”. But if the National Guard is the “Militia”, why in the world is it being expended overseas, and not defending the nation ONLY, as a Militia should? Actions speak louder than words, and simply by action (in war) alone, the National Guard is mostly a reserve unit of the military.

    Again, if the National Guard is the Militia, then it is being horribly mis-used in “THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE”. The true Militia has been ignored, in hopes that we would forget it, and therefore we would be “undefended” in the several states, instead of being defended properly with “a well regulated Militia”. pjr

  5. de Vattel: A natural born citizen is born in the coutnry of parentS who are citizens thereof
    May 5th, 2009 @ 12:16 am

    The Supreme Courth has ruled, if I remember correctly, that the Governors can not retain the National Guard in their states nor have formal authority over them BECAUSE THE NATIONAL GUARD IS NOT THE STATE’S MILITIA.

    Citations please, from those who know more about this?