ress release: the court to rule on the Notice of Treason by Barack Obama after Obama released a detainee, who is responsible for death of thousands of people, and who the court said cannot be released

Posted on | June 13, 2014 | No Comments

Press release: the court to rule on the Notice of Treason by Barack Obama after Obama released a detainee, who is responsible for death of thousands of people, and who the court said cannot be released

Law Offices of Orly Taitz

US District Court to rule on the notice of treason by Barack Obama. See the motion and docket below.

Today Attorney Orly Taitz was able to talk about this issue on KABC radio, as well as the fact that Obama is using a stolen CT Social Security number 042-68-4425 and fabricated ID. Taitz also advised the listeners that she will be protesting Obama tomorrow, June 14, 2014  11:30 am -2:30 am, State College Dr.-Autry way, before Obama’s commencement speech for UCI students at Anaheim stadium. Members of public are asked to join in protesting Obama tomorrow at 11:30 am and letting young graduates know that there is opposition to Obama regime.

https://ion-us.net/2014/03/23/impeach-obama-protest-planned-for-uc-irvine-graduation/

Attorney Taitz is working pro bono. Donations are greatly appreciated and can be given via pay-pal at www.TaitzReport.com or www.Orly TaitzESQ.com or by mail at 29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100, RSM, CA 92688

Colvin motion to expedite, notice of treason filed

U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Baltimore) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv-01878-ELH

Orly Taitz v. Colvin Assigned to: Judge Ellen L. Hollander Cause: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act

Date Filed: 06/25/2013 Date Terminated: 05/13/2014 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 895 Freedom of Information Act Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Plaintiff
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation TERMINATED: 07/08/2013	represented by	Defend Our Freedoms Foundation 29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, Ste 100 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 PRO SE
Plaintiff
Orly Taitz	represented by	Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Parkway STE 100 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 949-683-5411 PRO SE
V.
Defendant
Carolyn Colvin Commissioner of the Social Security Administration	represented by	Allen F Loucks  Office of the United States Attorney 36 S Charles St Fourth Fl Baltimore, MD 21201 14102094800 Fax: 14109620693 Email: allen.loucks@usdoj.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICEDAndrew George Norman  Office of the United States Attorney 36 S Charles St Fourth Fl Baltimore, MD 21201 14102094800 Fax: 14109620716 Email: andrew.norman@usdoj.gov TERMINATED: 01/07/2014 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Interested Party
SSA Notify

Date Filed	#	Docket Text
06/25/2013	1	COMPLAINT against Carolyn Colvin ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 14637067860.), filed by Defend Our Freedoms Foundation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(apls, Deputy Clerk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/28/2013: # 4 Summons) (apls, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 06/28/2013)
07/02/2013	2	ORDER directing Ms.Taitz to advise court within 14 days of intent re admission to the Courts bar or whether counsel will be entering their appearance; directing clerk to without issuance of summons pending further order of the court. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 7/2/2013. (c/m 7/3/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/03/2013)
07/08/2013	3	AMENDED COMPLAINT against Carolyn Colvin, filed by Orly Taitz.(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
07/09/2013	4	ORDER substituting Orly Taitz as plaintiff in lieu of Defend Our Freedoms Foundation; directing clerk to prepare and issue summons. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 7/9/2013. (c/m 7/9/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/09/2013)
07/09/2013	5	Summons Issued 60 days as to Carolyn Colvin, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Summons, # 2 Summons)(c/m 7/9/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/09/2013)
07/16/2013	6	SUMMONS Returned Executed by Orly Taitz. Carolyn Colvin served on 7/10/2013, answer due 9/9/2013. (aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 07/16/2013)
08/14/2013	7	MOTION to Dismiss ( Responses due by 9/3/2013), MOTION for Summary Judgment ( Responses due by 9/3/2013) by Carolyn Colvin (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Law, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5Exhibit D, # 6 Text of Proposed Order)(Norman, Andrew) (Entered: 08/14/2013)
08/15/2013	8	Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Orly Taitz. (c/m 8/15/2013 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/15/2013)
08/21/2013	9	RESPONSE in Opposition re 7 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exibit 1)(aos, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 8/21/2013 (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/21/2013: # 2 Tracking receipt) (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 08/21/2013)
08/23/2013	10	MOTION for Extension of Time by Carolyn Colvin Responses due by 9/9/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Norman, Andrew) (Entered: 08/23/2013)
08/23/2013	11	ORDER granting Defendant’s 10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 8/23/13. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/23/2013)
09/16/2013	12	REPLY to Response to Motion re 7 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn Colvin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A–Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A–Declaration, # 3 Exhibit B–Cover Sheet, # 4Exhibit B–Redacted FOIA)(Norman, Andrew) (Entered: 09/16/2013)
09/25/2013	13	REPLY to Opposition re 7 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Text of Proposed Order)(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 09/26/2013)
11/26/2013	14	MOTION/Request for the Defense to Prepare Vaugn Index by Orly Taitz (aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 11/26/2013)
12/11/2013	15	(FILED IN ERROR- ATTY TO REFILE)REPLY to Response to Motion re 14 MOTION for the Defense to Prepare Vaugn Index filed by Carolyn Colvin. (Norman, Andrew) Modified on 12/12/2013 (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 12/11/2013)
12/12/2013	16	QC NOTICE: 15 Reply to Response to Motion filed by Carolyn Colvin was filed incorrectly.  ****Please refile this document under category “Responses and Replies” using the event “Response to Motion”, and link the filing back to the original motion that was filed. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 12/12/2013)
12/12/2013	17	RESPONSE to Motion re 14 MOTION for the Defense to Prepare Vaugn Index filed by Carolyn Colvin. Replies due by 12/30/2013. (Norman, Andrew) (Entered: 12/12/2013)
12/13/2013	18	MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 12/13/13. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 12/16/13) (Entered: 12/16/2013)
12/13/2013	19	ORDER granting Defendant’s 7 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice and with leave to amend; denying Plaintiff’s 9 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice; setting deadline for Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 12/13/13. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 12/16/13) (Entered: 12/16/2013)
01/03/2014	20	SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Carolyn Colvin, filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 table of evidence, # 2 Certificate of Service, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6 Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit 5, # 8Exhibit 6, # 9 Exhibit 7, # 10 Exhibit 8, # 11 Exhibit 9, # 12 Exhibit 10, # 13 Exhibit 11, # 14 Exhibit 12, # 15 Exhibit 13, # 16 Exhibit 14, # 17 Exhibit 15, # 18 Exhibit 16, # 19 Exhibit 17, # 20 Exhibit 18, # 21 Exhibit 19, # 22 Exhibit 20, # 23 Exhibit 21, # 24 Exhibit 22, # 25 Exhibit 23)(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/03/2014)
01/07/2014	21	NOTICE to Substitute Attorney (Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/07/2014)
01/13/2014	22	MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint by Carolyn Colvin Responses due by 1/30/2014 (Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/13/2014)
01/14/2014	23	MEMORANDUM to Parties re Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 1/14/2014. (c/m 1/14/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/14/2014)
01/14/2014	24	Correspondence re: Extension of time for Response to Second Amended Complaint (Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/14/2014)
01/15/2014	25	Supplemental to 24 Miscellaneous Correspondence, 23 Memorandum to Parties filed by Carolyn Colvin . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/15/2014)
01/15/2014	26	MEMORANDUM to Parties granting 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 1/15/2014. (c/m 1/15/2015 CH/aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/15/2014)
01/22/2014	27	RESPONSE to Defendant’s 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint filed by Orly Taitz. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/22/2014)
01/30/2014	28	MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment by Carolyn Colvin Responses due by 2/18/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Law, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E)(Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/30/2014)
02/03/2014	29	(Filed in Error)Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Orly Taitz. (aos, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 2/3/2014 (aos, Deputy Clerk). (Entered: 02/03/2014)
02/03/2014	30	Rule 12/56 letter mailed to Orly Taitz. (c/m 2/3/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 02/03/2014)
02/19/2014	31	RESPONSE in Opposition re 28 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4Exhibit 4)(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 02/19/2014)
03/02/2014	32	REPLY to Response to Motion re 28 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn Colvin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 03/02/2014)
03/12/2014	33	RETURN PLEADING ORDER. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 3/12/2014. (Attachments: # 1 1st page of Ret Doc)(C/M 3/13/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/13/2014)
03/14/2014	34	ORDER re Filings with the Court. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 3/13/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment 1, # 2 Attachment 2)(c/m 3/14/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/14/2014)
03/14/2014	35	REPLY in Support of 31 Motion for Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff filed by Orly Taitz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6)(aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 03/14/2014)
05/13/2014	36	MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 5/13/2014. (C/M 5/13/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 05/13/2014)
05/13/2014	37	ORDER denying as moot 14 MOTION/Request for the Defense to Prepare Vaughn; granting 28 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment; denying 31 plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment and request for relief pursuant to 18§3332(a); directing clerk to close case. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 5/13/2014. (c/m 5/13/2014 aos, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 05/13/2014)
06/05/2014	38	MOTION for Reconsideration by Orly Taitz Responses due by 6/23/2014 (bas, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 06/06/2014)
06/13/2014	39	Return Pleading Letter sent to Frineds of Justice re: Amicus Curiae (Attachments: # 1 Amicus Curiae)(bas, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 06/13/2014)
06/13/2014	40	MOTION to Expedite Motion for Reconsideration, MOTION to Forward to the Federal Grand Jury, Notice of Treason by Orly Taitz Responses due by 6/30/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(bas, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 06/13/2014)

Category: Uncategorized

notice of Treason, motion to expedite submitted to the US District court

Posted on | June 12, 2014 | 18 Comments

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

ph. 949 -683-5411 fax 949-766-7603

orly.taitz@hushmail.com

IN THE US DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ                                                  ) Civil Action 13-cv-1878

Plaintiff                                                                    )Hon. Ellen Lipton Hollander

v                                                                                ) Presiding

Carolyn Colvin,                                                       )

in her official capacity as Acting Director    )

of Social Security Administration                    )

EMERGENCY MOTION

NOTICE OF TREASON COMMITTED BY THE HOLDER OF THE STOLEN CONNECTICUT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER xxx-xx-4425 OF HARRY BOUNEL, RISK TO NATIONAL SECURITY.

MOTION TO EXPEDITE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, EXPEDITE RELASE OF THE SS-5 TO SSN XXX-XX-4425 OF HARRY BOUNEL FRAUDULENTLY ASSUMED BY BARRY SOETORO,AKA BARRY SOEBARKAH, AKA BARACK OBAMA.

MOTION TO EXPEDIENTLY FORWARD TO THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY UNDER 18 USC 3332 OR ORDER BY THE COURT TO THE US ATTORNEY TO FORWARD TO THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY  EVIDENCE OF OBAMA’S USE OF A STOLEN CT SSN XX-XX-4425 AND BOGUS IDS, AS WELL AS RECENT ACT OF TREASON BY OBAMA, AKA SOETORO, AKA SOEBARKAH.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

In this case plaintiff provided the court with evidence that the SSA has SS-5, Social Security application of  Harry (Harrison) Bounel, which SSA wrongfully did not release claiming privacy, even though Bounel was born in 1890 and his documents are considered to be documents of extremely aged individual and do not fall under privacy exemption per 120 year rule. Plaintiff also provided this court with sworn affidavit of professional debt collector and researcher, which showed that Bounel had SSN xxx-xx-4425, which was later used by Barack Obama. Taitz also provided this court with some 150 pages of sworn affidavits of top law enforcement officials and  government records showing that Obama was a citizen of Indonesia, born in Kenya who used not only a stolen SSN of Harry Bounel, but also all fabricated ID. (SAC and exhibits).

On May 31, 2014 Barack Obama released five top Taliban terrorists, among them Khairulla Khairkhwa in exchange for a deserter Bowe Bergdahl. Soebarkah-Soetoro-Obama has engaged in this release without prior 30 day notification of the US Congress which Obama was required to effectuate under the NDAA of 2014 and without a notification to the US District Court and the Court of appeals, which denied Habeas Corpus for Khairulla and ruled only a year and a half earlier, on 12.14.2012 that Khairulla is too dangerous to the US to be released and has to stay in the US custody. Obama further obfuscated this release by making the notification to the US District court retroactively, on June 4 2014, four days after the release, misrepresenting the release as transfer and misspelling the name of this top terrorist, so that parties watching the case will not know who was released. While initially Obama tried to blame Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel in making the decision to release Khairulla, and throw Hagel under the bus, on June 11, 2014, Hagel testified before the US Congress and confirmed that the ultimate decision to release the terrorist five “Dream Team” was indeed made by the Commander in Chief Barack Obama. Actions of Obama in releasing and sending to roam free in Qatar of  Khairkulla Khairkhawa and the other four top Taliban lieutenants, guilty of deaths of thousands of people, can only be compared to  a hypothetical transfer by President Truman of Himmler, Goebbels, Heydrich, Goering and Eichman to sun bathe at the beaches of Rio at the time of Nuremberg trials.  By such actions Obama committed a high crime of treason, giving aid and comfort to the enemy under the 18US§ 2381. Actions by Obama invigorated jihadi-Taliban-Al Qaeda movement. Retired United States Army Lieutenant Colonel and author Ralph Peters appeared on FOX news on 06.11.2014 and stated in relation to  the recent Al-Qaeda victories in Iraq are the greatest Islamist conquests since the 12th Century.

“Patty Ann, this is President Obama’s real legacy. The creation of the first jihadi state in modern history stretching from central Syria to Central Iraq and now approaching Baghdad …And now, just to put this in perspective for viewers, with this jihadi conquest of Mosul and jihadi forces approaching Baghdad, this is shaping up to be the biggest Arab jihadi victory since the 12th Century, 1187, and the fall of Crusader Jerusalem. This is momentous.”. All of the above represent a exigent circumstance justifying a motion to expedite at hand.

Emergency motion at hand seeks an emergency ruling in release of the original SS-5 to SSN xxx-xx-4425, which was assigned to Harry Bounel and later fraudulently assumed by Obama, as well as forwarding by this court under 18USC 3332 to the federal Grand Jury for the District of  Maryland  or an order by this court to the US Attorney for the District of Maryland, representing defendants in this case, to forward to the Federal Grand Jury under 18 US  3332 all the evidence presented in this case.

ARGUMENT

18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason

“Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

As the President Elect Barack Obama took an oath of office to protect and defend the US Constitution and therefore owes allegiance to the United States.

As shown in the case at hand Obama aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Soebarkah,  has violated the US constitution and usurped the position of the US President using fabricated Selective Service Registration, fabricated birth certificate and  stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425. After Obama published this number with his tax returns, it was checked an failed both E-Verify and SSNVS and was found to be assigned to Harry Bounel, born in 1890. It is believed that though the original application, SS-5 of Harry Bounel is still contained in the SSA records, the Numident, electronic record was falsified. (SAC and exhibits)

In his school records from Assisi school in Jakarta Indonesia, Obama is listed  as a citizen of Indonesia, last name is the last name of his step father, Lolo Soetoro and religion Islam. (SAC and exhibits).  Obama was only one of a couple students who were listed as Muslim in that school.

In 2008 a number of GITMO prisoners, among them Khairulla Khairkhwa (Hereinater Khairulla), filed a legal action 08-cv-01805 in the US District Court for the District of Columbia seeking Habeas Corpus. US district court Judge Ricardo Urbina denied it in 2011 finding that Khairulla represents too great of a risk to the National security to be released. Petitioner Khairulla Khairkhwa, detainee,  filed an appeal in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The appeal was against Barack Obama, President of the United States, ET AL, apellees. Only a year and a half ago on 12.14.2012  a three judge panel of the circuit Judges Rogers, Garland and Randolph affirmed the decision by Judge Urbina.

In his opinion Senior Circuit Judge Randolph wrote as follows:

“Khairkhwa is a detainee at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base.

Khairkhwa v. Obama, 793 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2011). The

Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), Pub. L. No.

107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (2001), authorized the President to detain

individuals who were “part of” al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or

associated forces engaged in hostilities against the United States

or its allies. See, e.g., Al-Bihani v. Obama, 590 F.3d 866, 872

(D.C. Cir. 2010); Awad v. Obama, 608 F.3d 1, 11–12 (D.C. Cir.

2010). The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year

2012 affirmed the President’s authority to detain any “person

who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the

Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities

against the United States or its coalition partners, including any

person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly

supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.” Pub. L.

No. 112-81, § 1021, 125 Stat. 1298, 1562 (2011).

Khairkhwa, an Afghan national, became a senior Taliban

official in 1994, several years after Soviet troops withdrew from

Afghanistan. He admits as much but asserts that he was not a

part of the Taliban forces.1 The evidence presented at a four-day

hearing before the district court showed otherwise.

1 Although the district court discussed classified evidence, the

unclassified evidence set forth in this opinion is alone sufficient to

sustain the court’s denial of Khairkhwa’s petition.

Khairkhwa was a Taliban spokesman and senior district

administrator for several years, became governor of Kabul for

a brief period, and then served as the Taliban’s acting interior

minister from approximately 1996 to 1999. Khairkhwa, 793 F.

Supp. 2d at 16. He was one of ten members of the Taliban’s

highest leadership council, the Supreme Shura, which reported

directly to Taliban leader Mullah Omar and supervised

subordinate councils responsible for military operations. Id. at

32. Most of the members of senior Taliban shuras were also

military commanders. Id. at 33. Khairkhwa was no exception:

the district court found that he was a commander in the 1997 and

1998 Taliban assaults on the western Afghan city of Mazar-e-

Sharif.2 Id. at 21–32.

Mullah Omar appointed Khairkhwa governor of Herat

province in October 1999. He was still serving in that position

when the United States invaded Afghanistan in the fall of 2001.

Id. at 16–17, 33. As governor of Herat, Khairkhwa distributed

funds to Taliban military and security forces. Id. at 35. He had

extensive knowledge of Taliban military facilities, personnel,

and weapons caches and capabilities. Id. at 33–35. After he was

captured, Khairkhwa provided detailed information of the

Taliban’s assessments of shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles

and of the Taliban’s efforts to obtain and protect Stinger

missiles. Id. at 34–35. He also described each military facility

in Herat province, including its location, condition, special

characteristics or capabilities, and other sensitive information.

Id. at 33–34.

2 These were major battles fought during the Taliban’s violent

rise to power. Khairkhwa, 793 F. Supp. 2d at 21–22. Taliban forces

massacred thousands of the Hazara residents of Mazar-e-Sharif after

seizing the city in 1998. Id.

The evidence showed, and the district court found, that

officials in Khairkhwa’s position possessed military authority

under the Taliban governance structure. Id. at 33. “[N]early all

senior Taliban leaders held both civilian and military positions”;

Khairkhwa’s predecessor, Mullah Abdul Razaq, was a senior

military commander while he was governor of Herat. Id. The

obvious inference to be drawn from all of this evidence, an

inference the district court correctly drew, is that it was more

than likely that Khairkhwa wielded authority over military

matters during his tenure as governor of Herat.

Khairkhwa admits that he met with senior Iranian officials

several times while serving as Herat’s governor. He does not

deny that at one such meeting in January 2000, the participants

discussed how to protect Afghanistan from United States

intervention. Relying in part on these admissions, the district

court found that Khairkhwa participated in another high-level

meeting with Iranian officials in early October 2001. Id. at

37–38. The Iranian delegation included the deputy commander

of the Iranian Foreign Intelligence Service and the head of the

Afghan Department of the Iranian Foreign Intelligence Service.

Id. at 37. In anticipation of the U.S.-led military operation, the

Iranian officials offered military support for the Taliban’s

defense, including anti-aircraft missiles, other unspecified

equipment, and free passage for “Arabs” traveling between Iran

and Afghanistan. Id. at 37–38. The Taliban delegation also

included Abdul Manan Niazi, the governor of Kabul and

commander of the Taliban forces who committed atrocities at

Mazar-e-Sharif in August 1998. Id. at 37.

The district court thought it significant that Khairkhwa was

appointed to represent the Taliban in these high-level military

meetings. To the court, the evidence showed that Khairkhwa

“was entrusted with significant military-related responsibilities

at the time of the outbreak of hostilities with the United States

and strongly indicates that he was part of Taliban forces at that

time.” Id. at 40. The court properly rejected Khairkhwa’s

assertion that he was merely a security officer protecting the

Taliban delegation. Even if the evidence supported

Khairkhwa’s version, which it does not, this would still

“demonstrate that he possessed command authority over Taliban

forces on the eve of the U.S.-led invasion,” id. at 39.

The district court also found that Khairkhwa continued to

operate within the formal Taliban command structure after

Operation Enduring Freedom began in early October 2001, and

provided support to Taliban military forces. Id. at 40.

Khairkhwa admitted, during a 2002 interrogation, that in early

November 2001 he traveled from Herat to the Taliban-controlled

Kandahar province in a convoy of vehicles full of weapons and

that he turned over the weapons to a local official. Id. at 40–41.

Khairkhwa was arrested in Chaman, Pakistan, at the home

of Abdul Manan Niazi, the same former Taliban governor who

commanded Taliban forces at Mazar-e-Sharif, and who joined

Khairkhwa in the October 2001 meeting with Iranian

intelligence officials. Id. at 44–45. The circumstances of

Khairkhwa’s capture, his close ties with Mullah Omar, and the

absence of anything showing that he dissociated himself from

the Taliban demonstrated that Khairkhwa remained part of the

Taliban forces at the time of his capture. Id. at 43–45.” (exhibit 1 Memorandum opinion in 11-5180 Khairulla Khairkhwa)

In spite of the ruling by both District and Circuit courts that Khairulla Kahirkhwa was a senior Taliban commander who was responsible for military actions where thousands of people were slaughtered, and in clear violation of NDAA of 2014 not providing 30 day  notification to the US Congress, citizen of Indonesia Soetoro-Soebarkah-Obama released Khairkhwa and paid for his travel to Qatar were Khairkhwa is allowed to live free.

It is noteworthy that on June 4, 2014, four days after the release, not before the release, Obama notified the US District court. Exhibit 1Notice of transfer  of Khairulla Khairkhwa et al v Bush 08-cv-01805 RCL,  ECF 225. Obama, who became the lead respondent in the case, filed “Notice of Transfer” stating “Respondents hereby provide notice that the United States has relinquished custody of Petitioner KHAIR ULLA SAID WALI KHAIRHWA (ISN 579) and transferred him to the control of Qatar. June 4, 2014″     So, if the US District Court Senior Judge, Royce C. Lambeth,  who was overseeing the case after resignation of Judge Urbina, wanted to stay this release  due to prior finding of threat to national security, this could not have been done, since Obama notified the court four days after he sent the detainee to sunbathe in Qatar.   Simlarly Obama did not provide  30 day notification to the US Congress, which was required under 2014 NDAA, so the two co-equal branches of the US government were not able to stop this egregious act of treason and this  transfer which greatly endangered  US National security. Consequently Taliban commanders made statements that this release was equal to gaining 10,000 Taliban fighters.

It is further noteworthy that Obama did not title the document as a release from GITMO, but titled is as a transfer. Further, the name of the detainee was written differently from the name in the caption in the case, which made it difficult to find the document. In the caption the first name of the detainee is Khairulla. In the release, titled as transfer, the first name was divided into two names: “KHAI  ULLA’. Moreover,  two middle names, which were not in the original caption were incerted: “SAID WALI”. So the original name from the caption in the case “Khairulla  Khairkhwa” looked completely different “KHAIR ULLA SAID WALI KHAIRKHWA”. Plaintiff believes that it was done to obfuscate the record.

Actions by Obama clearly represented TREASON, “giving aid and comfort to the enemy” per 18 US§2381. Shortly after these actions by Obama, greatly encouraged and  invigorated jihadists and Taliban fighters took over the airport in Karachi and murdered 12. Five US soldiers were killed reportedly with stinger missile, jihadists groups went into offensive and took over the whole area between central Syria to central Iraq and took over Mosul and Tiqrit. This caused  fleeing by 500,000 refuges and the jihadist army is now rapidly closing in on the capital of Iraq, Bagdad. Based on all of the above over 4,000 lives of the US soldiers  lost in operation “Iraqi Freedom”, were lost in vain, not mentioning 68,000 soldiers, who were severely wounded, paralyzed, lost limbs and became disabled for life.  Plaintiff believes that exigency of this matter is flagrantly obvious and self explanatory, not requiring further briefing.

This court has in front of it evidence showing that Barack Obama is using a stolen Connecticut Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 of Harry Bounel, which failed E-Verify and SSNVS, when checked under Obama.  this court has evidence of Obama’ use of other bogus IDs, as well as an act of treason committed by Obama. further refusal by this court to release the aforementioned SS-5 and refusal to forward all of the aforementioned evidence of offenses against the criminal laws of the US to the Federal grand jury, will make this court complicit in aiding and abetting in these offenses, including treason.   This court has in front of it Plaintiff’s motion to reconsider 18US 3332 (a) It shall be the duty of each such grand jury impaneled within any judicial district to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district. Such alleged offenses may be brought to the attention of the grand jury by the court or by any attorney appearing on behalf of the United States for the presentation of evidence. Any such attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other person, inform the grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of such other person, and such attorney’s action or recommendation.” plaintiff Taitz is seeking expediting of the above motions for reconsideration.

REQUESTED RELIEF

1. TO EXPEDITE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, EXPEDITE RELASE OF THE SS-5 TO SSN XXX-XX-4425 OF HARRY BOUNEL FRAUDULENTLY ASSUMED BY BARRY SOETORO,AKA BARRY SOEBARKAH, AKA BARACK OBAMA.

2. TO EXPEDIENTLY FORWARD TO THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY UNDER 18 USC 3332 OR ORDER BY THE COURT TO THE US ATTORNEY TO FORWARD TO THE FEDERAL GRAND JURY  EVIDENCE OF OBAMA’S USE OF A STOLEN CT SSN XX-XX-4425 AND BOGUS IDS, AS WELL AS RECENT ACT OF TREASON BY OBAMA, AKA SOETORO, AKA SOEBARKAH.

Respectfully submitted,

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

cc James Comey, Director of  FBI

cc Inspector General department of justice

cc International Criminal Court

cc Inter-American Commission for Human rights

cc House Armed services Committee

cc Judiciary Committee