a vindication after 4 years of struggle. ObqmaForgeryGate is front and center on Drudgereport. Demand coverage on FOX, Savage, Limaugh, Hannitty. Boycott the station that do not cover ObamaForgeryGate
Posted on | July 18, 2012 | 2 Comments
Sheriff Joe's Obama probe finds 'national security threat'...
Calls Congress to move on eligibility...
VIDEO: 'Every document surrounding Obama plagued with problems'...

Comments
2 Responses to “a vindication after 4 years of struggle. ObqmaForgeryGate is front and center on Drudgereport. Demand coverage on FOX, Savage, Limaugh, Hannitty. Boycott the station that do not cover ObamaForgeryGate”
Leave a Reply












29839 Sta Margarita Pkwy, 
Videography by Barbara Rosenfeld 

July 18th, 2012 @ 9:28 am
Since The State of Hawaii continues to claim that the cheap, fraudulent piece of paper that What’s His Name presented to the American people on April 27th, 2011 on television as his official honest to truth Birth Certification, why don’t they, the State of Hawaii have there very best people/person appear in a press conference on National Television and discuss/debate with/against the very best print experts, the validity of said document. Numerous top print expert have already declared said document a very cheap poor forgery.
I am sure that Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq would also be very willing to be part of such a press conference on National Television. But I think the State of Hawaii is scared to death of Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.
Another good person to have join in would be the Ex Governor of Hawaii Lingle, and see why she has been saying what she has been saying on this issue. That would be very interesting to see Ex Governor Lingle explain to those top print experts why she says a document that they have declared a cheap poor forgery, she continues claim to be the REAL THING!
You know if the State of Hawaii would just address this issue straight on and quit dodging, hiding, ducking, and refusing to come up with any solid proof that the junk piece of paper is really a Birth Certificate that they prepared in 1961 with no changes or alteration to it, maybe this whole issue could be put to rest one way or another.
You know why the State of Hawaii won’t do that?
BECAUSE THEY CAN’T, and that, that!!
Thank you Matt Drudge
July 18th, 2012 @ 6:04 pm
Hello once again. I would like to point out, in case no one has noticed, Ms. Fukino has states she has seen the original BC on file and VAULTED!!! The Hawaiian Health Act of 1958 states, unless I recollect wrongly, that a relative or a person with a “vested interest” could apply for a BC by mail or phone, AND if the said child and mother are neither to be found locally, the BC would be VAULTED and ADJUDICATED at time of need! Ms. Fukino is stating the document is WHERE IT SHOULD BE if the child had no record of birth!